This voting law alone rids us of the hate group the right calls a party and it is 1/100 as offensive as the 300 bills the right has put together across the nation to take away votes of Democrats to get rid of us. The right can no longer exist in a democracy and they know it ,so they will do anything at all to stay in power, that includes anything to take away the votes of Democrats and anyway at all to turn around election for any reason, of course that reason will be if Dems win. their 1/6 attempt to bring down our country and democracy to force in a piece of shit for a dictator. Show us clearly what they will do if we let them. If you are a patriot , you won't let them.
Make it a law everyone has to vote in federal election.
- Thread starter jbander
- Start date
BidenPresident
Verified User
Agree.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Our constitution makes everything that red state legislatures do to suppress voting PERFCTLY OK.
We can write all the laws that we want.
One, fuckface Joe Manchin will block them.
Two, the orangutan's hand picked SCOTUS will strike them down if they pass.
I repeat, our constitution specifically makes state controlled voter suppression OK.
Why can't everybody see that?
Licking the constitution's rectum is something for the far right to do, not us.
We can write all the laws that we want.
One, fuckface Joe Manchin will block them.
Two, the orangutan's hand picked SCOTUS will strike them down if they pass.
I repeat, our constitution specifically makes state controlled voter suppression OK.
Why can't everybody see that?
Licking the constitution's rectum is something for the far right to do, not us.
Yakuda
Verified User
More leftist totalitarianism. I love when you cunts just blurt this shit out. Makes you look even.more retarded. If that's possible.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Maybe we can hand out bottles of whiskey as an incentive like the Soviets did with Vodka to get people to vote. Even easier, you got to cast a ballot that was blank for the Communists or you could mark your ballot as a dissenter for gulag...
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Could you regale us with some specific ways red states are suppressing voting?
Yakuda
Verified User
Yeah you leftists cunts want to fuck the constitutions rectum. It's amazing how retarded you are. I bet you're wearing a hockey helmet right now.
Sure. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-march-2021 The repubs have relied on suppression for a long, long time. The fact that the Repubs are losing their voter base and cannot compete fairly, is what spurred all the suppression.
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
If EVERY eligible citizen is registered and then required to submit at the very least an unmarked ballot if that's that person's preference,
it will be called an "imposition" by the Libertarians,
but it will be a worthwhile one which results in fair elections.
Every citizen of sound mind, including those incarcerated in prison, must be required to participate.
Everybody over 21.
18- year- olds just want to get high and fuck--who's kidding whom?--so we can afford them a little more time.
it will be called an "imposition" by the Libertarians,
but it will be a worthwhile one which results in fair elections.
Every citizen of sound mind, including those incarcerated in prison, must be required to participate.
Everybody over 21.
18- year- olds just want to get high and fuck--who's kidding whom?--so we can afford them a little more time.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Well, let's start by looking at one of the bills your source lists as "voter suppression."
How does requiring voters "provide a state identification number or photocopy of an identifying document with their absentee ballot application" voter suppression? This requirement is pre-voting. That is, when you register to vote. That someone is required to provide identification as to who they are applying for an absentee ballot is not an onerous requirement. In fact, once you had such a document in hand you could reuse it for future elections. It doesn't suppress the vote in any way. Knowing you must provide such a document to get an absentee ballot gives you like forever--well months--to get the document before applying.
Barring election officials from mailing everyone an application is not suppressive either, unless you think voters and the public are retards. Officials could use public advertising to tell the public to apply for a ballot and even how to do that. This simply puts the onus of getting a ballot on the voter rather than election officials.
As for "less time to apply," how much time is appropriate? A week? How about a month? Any time the voter wants to? This is an absurd argument, particularly when nothing is presented about what the time limit being sought is.
Early voting? This is the same absurd argument. We used to have an election day. Now it's more like an election season that's in some places well over a month long. Ballots that are cast after the official end of the election are still counted as valid some places. How idiotically absurd is that? What, people can't be bothered to take a bit of time and vote? Or, is voting so unimportant that we shouldn't bother or inconvenience anyone in having to do it? I thought voting was a very serious matter that should be taken seriously but apparently not by the Brennen Center...
Then there's "drop boxes." Since when was the standard for ballot handling to put unsupervised boxes at various locations and leave them there for weeks filling with ballots? How utterly stupid is that idea? What, people can't be inconvenienced to actually mail or hand in their ballot through a more secure system?
If you go through the Brennan Center's list these themes are recurring. Their central argument isn't that voting is being suppressed but that it isn't being made as simplistic, widely available, unsupervised, and uncontrolled as possible. It seems more a variant of "Vote early, vote often..." than an attempt to make a valid argument for how these laws create voter suppression. Maybe they can hand out these during election season since it isn't a day anymore...
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you idiots really love the idea of forcing people to do things, don't you?
85% of the voting population vote and the hate party is toast. There are 22 countries that have mandatory voting and Russia isn't one of them, nor has it ever had it. So I say this is just another normal hate party lie , they have to lie because everything about them that is true is ugly cruel unAmerican and traitorous .
Here's a thought ... use a little reading comprehension the next time you read one of my posts. Look at each word and think about what each word says. Also compare what the response is and compare it to the topic.
Your retort is meaningless babble.
85% of the voting population vote and the hate party is toast. There are 22 countries that have mandatory voting and Russia isn't one of them, nor has it ever had it. So I say this is just another normal hate party lie , they have to lie because everything about them that is true is ugly cruel unAmerican and traitorous .
"and yours is a lie not even close to the truth, You said this "
The soviets had such a law and N E V E R got 100% "TOTAL LIE!!!!! and that is responding to this thread here, that I think making it a law that everyone in this country vote is a great idea since it will get rid of the hate party.
"
wow ... a stuck record ... posts 15 and 17 are the same ... wow ... shall we try for 3 ???
Which part ???