Male Dumbasses

C

Cancel7

Banned
I bet that if Christine O'Donnell had said this there would already be several threads on this board about it.

Why is that?

Here you have a an ex-football player who apparently, is a complete and utter moron. No threads. Keith Olbermann didn't have a skit about him last night.

Do you know how many dumb men are already in Congress? How many male brain donor survivors are running for Congress this year?

Christine O'Donnell. That's all I hear about. Yeah, she's stupid. And if she's ever looking for a boyfriend? She won't have to look far if she's in DC.

"In their debate last night, freshman Rep. John Adler (D-NJ) asked former Philadelphia Eagle Jon Runyan (R) for "an example from the last 10 or 15 years of a Supreme Court decision in which you strongly disagree?"

Runyan's response: Dred Scott."

Video: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...t-scotus-decision-he-disagreed-with-video.php
 
Darla said:
I bet that if Christine O'Donnell had said this there would already be several threads on this board about it.

Why is that?

Here you have a an ex-football player who apparently, is a complete and utter moron. No threads. Keith Olbermann didn't have a skit about him last night.

Do you know how many dumb men are already in Congress? How many male brain donor survivors are running for Congress this year?

Christine O'Donnell. That's all I hear about. Yeah, she's stupid. And if she's ever looking for a boyfriend? She won't have to look far if she's in DC.

"In their debate last night, freshman Rep. John Adler (D-NJ) asked former Philadelphia Eagle Jon Runyan (R) for "an example from the last 10 or 15 years of a Supreme Court decision in which you strongly disagree?"

Runyan's response: Dred Scott."

Video: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/...t-scotus-decision-he-disagreed-with-video.php
Click to expand...

Ok, I laughed out loud at that one. Didn't see it coming.
 
maybe he didn't hear the part about last 10-15 years....

tff how his answer just horrifies the left though...dred scott's a great case right lefties!!! :palm:
 
In one of Bush's debates with Gore, they asked him about what kind of justices he'd appoint, and also asked him to cite some SC cases that he could use as an example of what he was looking for in a justice.

He cited Dred Scott, which I thought was pretty funny at the time. Unlike Runyon, they didn't give him a timeframe, but it just seemed really strange that he didn't come up with anything more recent.

I think 7th grade is the last time that some people really pay attention to the court....
 
My guess is that Jon Runyan is just an idiot. As an Eagles fan, I like the guy. But I get the sense that he was recruited to run for Congress not based on his policy wonkishness and wealth of knowledge.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
did anyone ask Adler if in the last two years he had seen a spending proposal with which he strongly disagreed?......
Click to expand...

Translation: HOw dare you start a thread like this. Let's talk about what I demand to talk about.

How about you start your own thread?

Damo or Grind can walk you through it.
 
duh, darla. this is the caliber of candidate you get when idiot righties and lefties turn an election in to a popularity contest instead of finding intelligent and educated normal citizens.
 
Onceler said:
In one of Bush's debates with Gore, they asked him about what kind of justices he'd appoint, and also asked him to cite some SC cases that he could use as an example of what he was looking for in a justice.

He cited Dred Scott, which I thought was pretty funny at the time. Unlike Runyon, they didn't give him a timeframe, but it just seemed really strange that he didn't come up with anything more recent.

I think 7th grade is the last time that some people really pay attention to the court....
Click to expand...
As usual, it always comes back to Bush.....so what more recent SC dec. should be have disagreed with?
Ever consider, there was none more recent, or more important.

No....no...I imagine you're incapable of being that reasonable.
 
bravo said:
As usual, it always comes back to Bush.....so what more recent SC dec. should be have disagreed with?
Ever consider, there was none more recent, or more important.

No....no...I imagine you're incapable of being that reasonable.
Click to expand...


The safest answer is Kelo v. City of New London. It works for anyone regardless of political affiliation and is often the stock Republican response. For Democrats, Citizens United is fairly popular as well. Those are the two big ones.
 
Onceler said:
In one of Bush's debates with Gore, they asked him about what kind of justices he'd appoint, and also asked him to cite some SC cases that he could use as an example of what he was looking for in a justice.

He cited Dred Scott, which I thought was pretty funny at the time. Unlike Runyon, they didn't give him a timeframe, but it just seemed really strange that he didn't come up with anything more recent.

I think 7th grade is the last time that some people really pay attention to the court....
Click to expand...


Dred Scott is a dog-whistle for the hardcore anti-abortion extremists.
 
NigelTufnel said:
The safest answer is Kelo v. City of New London. It works for anyone regardless of political affiliation and is often the stock Republican response. For Democrats, Citizens United is fairly popular as well. Those are the two big ones.
Click to expand...

Agreed, I fucking hate the Kelo ruling.
 
Darla said:
Translation: HOw dare you start a thread like this. Let's talk about what I demand to talk about.

How about you start your own thread?

Damo or Grind can walk you through it.
Click to expand...

what and miss all the fun here?.....actually I don't think I ever discussed anything with you before.......nice to meet you....nicer to mock you.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top