Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Not at all. But even well-informed laypersons completely lacking in any legal education whatsoever can at least name a supreme court case or two with which they disagree with the outcome even if they do not necessarily understand the legal niceties involved. I mean, on this very board the Kelo decision was overwhelmingly rejected and we had robust discussions of the Citizens United decision, the Ledbetter decision, the Exxon Valdez decision. It doesn't require a legal education to agree or disagree with the outcomes in those cases.
ok....then do you believe he is an idiot because he lacks legal knowledge of what the supreme court has decided?
i don't know anything about this guy and it seems like a nervous reaction...his response afterwards was that he would answer with citizens...which of course you and he are in agreement....kind of odd don't you think
