Ishmael Pequod
Banned
Race hustlers love ignorant creatures like you.
Marry girls when they're '15 or 16,' said 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson???
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Race hustlers love ignorant creatures like you.
Another lie Counselor; tell me something - when you argue in a court, do you get sanctioned by the judges for blatant stupidity?
Last edited:
Maybe his cases don't make it to court...
Wrong again dunce; you were asked if any laws had been broken. And in typical dunce like dishonest fashion, you chose to delfect with an unrelated off topic question about legal morality. You didn't answer the question, typical, and you won't address the thread topic, typical, and you are acting like a dunce; typical.
Something we can never expect from you; honesty or answering the question.
Yes I would; but it begs the question what the hell is your point? Are you PRESUMING, AGAIN, LIKE THE LYING DUNCE THAT YOU ARE, THAT PHIL behaved immorally; and if so, how?
God you’re an epic dunce.
You turn dishonesty into an art form; you're an epic dunce.
Elected official? No wonder he is such a dunce.
He doesn't want to share all his views with the electorate, for some reason, even though he claimed to be "an open book".
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Isn't that amazing?
It's been proven time and time again that Conservatives here can't hold up their side of the conversation, so invariably they resort to the taunts and invective.
For some reason however, JPP Conservatives seem to take pride in their cluelessness and revel in their ability to hurl invective.
After all the rants are done, why don't you ask your parents or grand parents how old they were when they married...or better still, maybe how old they were when
they first had a child....it might surprise you.....it was pretty common a few decades back.....and so were the laws.
Times have changed and ideas are different, thats all...
they first had a child....it might surprise you.....it was pretty common a few decades back.....and so were the laws.
Times have changed and ideas are different, thats all...
My grandmothers were both 22 when they got married. My grandfathers were 22 and 26.
The fact is that it does not matter what our ancestors did in times past... what matters is what is best for people now.
In most situations I believe it is VERY harmful for people to marry too early. I was 35 when I got married and I Thank God very often that I did not marry when I was younger. I would not have chosen such a wonderful woman and I would have missed out on many of the amazing experiences I had in my 20's and 30's. I suspect I would not have remained faithful or married.
The main difference is longevity. Back in the day it was usually necessary to have children at a much younger age and young people were burdened with heavier responsibilities earlier in life. As a product of that time, Phil is just noting what he feels. There is nothing really immoral about his opinion on the subject here.
Personally I do not like the idea that we allow parent "permission" for minors to marry, we all know that kids simply don't have the ability to make lifelong life-altering choices like this as a group at that age.
IMO, we should change the laws so that only adults can marry and parents don't get an "it's okay" vote on those younger. We need laws to reflect the values of the current reality.
In the above situation, Damocles was most likely correct, I have since found. He called me stupid because I was not willing to accept Cart Blanch the story promoted by the Media. The site he provided only insinuated that what he was claiming was true. I was able to search and find stories that more directly connected the dots, and I suspect Damocles was correct.
That does not justify him calling me stupid or his line of thinking on the issue.
I agree with you, but what do you do when a teenager who is not yet an adult becomes pregnant?
I don't think its as much longevity as it is wealth and education.
Jarod, I don't think people should lecture others if they aren't plugged into current events enough to understand a simple sarcastic comment. That we had to go that deep into explaining it made me feel like I was trying to tell children a joke for which they hadn't the experience necessary to understand. While I would never react that way to children, having to explain something that should be obvious (and probably was to almost every other person on the site) was frustrating.
I'm sorry I got frustrated and called you "stupid", but really we kind of expect people who argue here to be plugged into current events enough to not demand "proof" for sarcasm.
Yes, we know.
It's all of those, but mostly longevity. Back then the average lifespan of a dude was in his 50s. In order to be able to raise kids you had to begin earlier.