Masks don't prevent transmission of Viruses

AProudLefty said:
I already have multiple times.
Click to expand...

Lol, I love that one. It's already posted "somewhere". Right between to the evidence that proves Trump is a racist and the evidence that proves Trump colluded with the Russians, right?

And do you realize the the first link to a science journal is about common cold? :laugh:
Click to expand...

wow how fascinating

Anyway, I have countered your article with another article about the droplets. Droplets are bigger than the mask pores.
Click to expand...

You just responded to my request that you copy n paste any errors from the article here so we can see it, with your claim that you have already done this multiple times. Posting some article about droplets is evasion, which contradicts your claim that you have quoted errors from the article.

APL, there is a good reason why you are stuck having to play this "who's on first" game, and why you can't slap the righties with truth bombs. Never in history has improper ppe been recommended or allowed to be used for hazmat before covid politics, and the left is still trying to push improper ppe now. The cheap cloth fake masks and even the n95s are not the proper ppe for viruses. You got stuck defending improper ppe like you got stuck defending violent protesters, ms13, illegal immigration, defund police, marxism, and everything else that you have to deny defending. You even got stuck having to be against making America great again.
 
Evmetro said:
Lol, I love that one. It's already posted "somewhere". Right between to the evidence that proves Trump is a racist and the evidence that proves Trump colluded with the Russians, right?
Click to expand...

You're babbling.

wow how fascinating
Click to expand...

Yep. Very fascinating how they would include a journal about common cold in the very first link.

You just responded to my request that you copy n paste any errors from the article here so we can see it, with your claim that you have already done this multiple times. Posting some article about droplets is evasion, which contradicts your claim that you have quoted errors from the article.

APL, there is a good reason why you are stuck having to play this "who's on first" game, and why you can't slap the righties with truth bombs. Never in history has improper ppe been recommended or allowed to be used for hazmat before covid politics, and the left is still trying to push improper ppe now. The cheap cloth fake masks and even the n95s are not the proper ppe for viruses. You got stuck defending improper ppe like you got stuck defending violent protesters, ms13, illegal immigration, defund police, marxism, and everything else that you have to deny defending. You even got stuck having to be against making America great again.
Click to expand...

You're babbling again. Violent protesters? MS-13? Illegal immigration? Defund police? Marxism?

I think I see your problem.
 
AProudLefty said:
I already have multiple times. And do you realize the the first link to a science journal is about common cold? :laugh:

Anyway, I have countered your article with another article about the droplets. Droplets are bigger than the mask pores.
Click to expand...

What makes your article valid? Appears as if you're using the "because I said so" argument.
 
AProudLefty said:
I don't take much stock in Rasmussen Reports.
Click to expand...
But you just got done telling me that "sources are important"... So I provided you with a source, and you didn't consider it to be important... you just outright rejected it...

Predictably, you just demolished your own argument, dude... Thank you.
 
Evmetro said:
I'll answer whatever evasion question you want after you quote where you have quote something you dispute from the article. If you already did, repost it.
Click to expand...
People have already successfully disputed the entire premise of the article by linking to studies that conclude that masks do work. Let the evasions and diversions begin.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
But you just got done telling me that "sources are important"... So I provided you with a source, and you didn't consider it to be important... you just outright rejected it...

Predictably, you just demolished your own argument, dude... Thank you.
Click to expand...

Lefties have no shame.
 
CFM said:
What makes your article valid? Appears as if you're using the "because I said so" argument.
Click to expand...

References to scientific journals are what make articles valid. And yet you guys keep harping about anonymous sources and yet you guys complain when articles ACTUALLY have legit sources. :palm:
 
Evmetro said:
Lol, I love that one. It's already posted "somewhere". Right between to the evidence that proves Trump is a racist and the evidence that proves Trump colluded with the Russians, right?



wow how fascinating



You just responded to my request that you copy n paste any errors from the article here so we can see it, with your claim that you have already done this multiple times. Posting some article about droplets is evasion, which contradicts your claim that you have quoted errors from the article.

APL, there is a good reason why you are stuck having to play this "who's on first" game, and why you can't slap the righties with truth bombs. Never in history has improper ppe been recommended or allowed to be used for hazmat before covid politics, and the left is still trying to push improper ppe now. The cheap cloth fake masks and even the n95s are not the proper ppe for viruses. You got stuck defending improper ppe like you got stuck defending violent protesters, ms13, illegal immigration, defund police, marxism, and everything else that you have to deny defending. You even got stuck having to be against making America great again.
Click to expand...

Nobody's against making America great again, although America is already great and, before Trump, was getting greater. What we're against is Trump and the right turning America into a 3rd world shithole. But you already wallow in shit.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
But you just got done telling me that "sources are important"... So I provided you with a source, and you didn't consider it to be important... you just outright rejected it...

Predictably, you just demolished your own argument, dude... Thank you.
Click to expand...

:palm: You are going off in a deep end. I hope you are feeling okay.

Anyway, the sources WITH legit references are important. What you posted was a poll.
 
AProudLefty said:
References to scientific journals are what make articles valid. And yet you guys keep harping about anonymous sources and yet you guys complain when articles ACTUALLY have legit sources. :palm:
Click to expand...

There are scientific journals that claim climate change is occurring and we both know that is a hoax. It's not valid because it says what you want to hear.
 
CFM said:
There are scientific journals that claim climate change is occurring and we both know that is a hoax. It's not valid because it says what you want to hear.
Click to expand...

This thread isn't about climate change. Make your own thread on it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top