SmarterthanYou
rebel
and not a word of protest by liberals.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics...use_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/

http://www.boston.com/news/politics...use_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/

well crap.
Damo, please merge.
What, if any, are the differences between the legislation in Mass. and Wis, Ohio?
What, if any, are the differences between the legislation in Mass. and Wis, Ohio?
and not a word of protest by liberals.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics...use_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/
![]()
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;806026 said:Maybe you Trumplings convinced 'em. You're just so persuasive.
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;806029 said:So much so that you felt compelled to comment.
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;806036 said:I think people can reasonably see some silver lining in the present even when viewed through the darkest cloud of the past.
¯¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿;806036 said:I think people can reasonably see some silver lining in the present even when viewed through the darkest cloud of the past.
The Mass law is limited to collective bargaining over health insurance issues and gives local authorities the ability to set deductables and co-pay amounts after 30 days notice to the union. It is much much much more limited that the bill in Wisconsin. I'm not sure about the Ohio law.
I'm glad my rep voted against it.