Masterpiece: Obama in Pee Pee!

It was done with a statue of Jesus Christ. Did Christians go nuts? Tell us how many heads were lopped off by Christians over that? If it was Mohammed in a jar of piss and muslims chopped off a few heads over it, the left would be demanding the perpetrator jailed and everyone respect Islam.

I remember Christians going nuts, not killing people nuts, but ranting on TV nuts. I would support and defend the person who put Mohammed in the jar, much like I support and defend Soloman Rushdie.
 
Why are you using quotes? I never said anyone was "going nuts". I hypothisized that if somone did this to a statute of Reagan, Beck would be going nuts. I enjoy when wackos illistrate themselves to be hypocrates.

Did Beck use "Tax Dollars" (Sic) to do this?

I used quotes because it is easier than typing all the crap to underline the Title of an art piece. And yeah, you said that someone would "be nuts"... So I used quotes there because I was quoting you.

And no, Beck didn't use tax dollars (spelled correctly BTW and misquoted I said "government money" not "Tax Dollars", you really shouldn't attempt to play the spelling Nazi, you really really suck at that), that was part of the point of the art. The "Piss Christ" was subsidized by the government.

You, in your total purposeful ignorance, said that Beck would "be nuts" if Reagan were put in piss. I pointed out that his God was put in Piss and he hadn't gone nuts, so your insistence that a President he liked would send him over the edge was based in false assumptions.
 
I used quotes because it is easier than typing all the crap to underline the Title of an art piece. And yeah, you said that someone would "be nuts"... So I used quotes there because I was quoting you.

And no, Beck didn't use tax dollars (spelled correctly BTW and misquoted I said "government money" not "Tax Dollars", you really shouldn't attempt to play the spelling Nazi, you really really suck at that), that was part of the point of the art. The "Piss Christ" was subsidized by the government.

You, in your total purposeful ignorance, said that Beck would "be nuts" if Reagan were put in piss. I pointed out that his God was put in Piss and he hadn't gone nuts, so your insistence that a President he liked would send him over the edge was based in false assumptions.

I was not being a spelling nazi, I was being a quotes nazi, and not really a nazi, it was just a poor attempt at humor that did not come across.

When you quote someone however, you should do it accuratly if you put it in quotes... so dont change the words around to make your point seem more solid... Thats kinda the point of quotes.
 
Righties, as usual, have very little originality.

If there was a JPP equivalent of the NFL Today's "C'mon, Man!", this thread & Damo's on the "war on men" would be right up there.
 
I remember Christians going nuts, not killing people nuts, but ranting on TV nuts. I would support and defend the person who put Mohammed in the jar, much like I support and defend Soloman Rushdie.

Show us the videos. You can't because you're full of shit.
 
Righties, as usual, have very little originality.

If there was a JPP equivalent of the NFL Today's "C'mon, Man!", this thread & Damo's on the "war on men" would be right up there.

The real war is the war on the truth. Those who rebel and will not fall into line to the indoctrination farm will be dealt with severely.
 
http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/11/28/how-can-you-buy-obama-in-pee-pee-and-glenns-other-works-of-art/

View attachment 1904

How can you buy “Obama in Pee Pee” and Glenn’s other works of art?
Wednesday, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:02 AM CST

Donate directly to the Hope for the Holidays HERE

Last night, Glenn created a artistic masterpiece live on TV: “Obama in Pee Pee” (or “Flobama”, the name has been changing all day). But that wasn’t the only piece of art Glenn created last night, he also painted five other paintings. And rather than keep these for his personal collection, he has decided to put them up for auction to benefit Mercury One and their Hope for the Holidays fund. The Hope for the Holidays fund will be used by Mercury One to partner with food pantries, churches and synagogues across the country to provide toys for children, food for the hungry, shelter for the homeless, and prepare for tough economic times ahead.

Each painting is one of a kind and is signed by Glenn Beck. Below are the links so you can bid in the auction on E-Bay.

(I would love to own Piss Obama!)

Good old Glenn trying to do nything he can to get his 15 minutes! I hope he makes lots of money for his charity!
 
I used quotes because it is easier than typing all the crap to underline the Title of an art piece. And yeah, you said that someone would "be nuts"... So I used quotes there because I was quoting you.

And no, Beck didn't use tax dollars (spelled correctly BTW and misquoted I said "government money" not "Tax Dollars", you really shouldn't attempt to play the spelling Nazi, you really really suck at that), that was part of the point of the art. The "Piss Christ" was subsidized by the government.

You, in your total purposeful ignorance, said that Beck would "be nuts" if Reagan were put in piss. I pointed out that his God was put in Piss and he hadn't gone nuts, so your insistence that a President he liked would send him over the edge was based in false assumptions.

Serrano didn't use tax payer dollars, either. He won a contest for his photo and a prize of $15,000 which was sponsored by the tax payer funded National Endowment of the Arts.
 
As I understand it, it's actually Glenn Beck's urine! The piece was taken down by ebay because of it being human waste. At the time they took it down, the bidding had already reached $11k.


Come on lad...get real....it was fake.....colored water....
 
These will be great collectors pieces. I can see then in 100 years bringing huge sums at Sothbys. Or in the real world, they will raise lots of money for charity (a good thing) and the people who buy them, especially Becks urine, will be seen as the right wing cry baby loser loons they are. The right has gone even more insane this election than the left did in 2000. Calls for secession etc. Just goes to show, the right hates democracy when it doesn't go their way JUST LIKE THE LEFT. You are mirror images of one another.


What ever happened the "Piss Christ".....in real, authentic urine....taxpayer funded exhibit...

did it become a great collectors piece ?
 
Last edited:
Serrano didn't use tax payer dollars, either. He won a contest for his photo and a prize of $15,000 which was sponsored by the tax payer funded National Endowment of the Arts.

Federal money given to the National Endowment for the Arts was used in funding the Art Exhibit where it was on display....
 
What ever happened the "Piss Christ".....in real, authentic urine....taxpayer funded.....

did it become a great collectors piece ?

It was not tax payer funded, that is a lie. It was a contest sponsored by the National Endowment of the Arts and Serrano won the prize money of $15,000.

I will correct your error, but I know it does no good.

He was not given money to create this piece of art, he created it, then won first place for his photo.
 
Federal money given to the National Endowment for the Arts was used in funding the Art Exhibit where it was on display....

Yes, he won first place for his photo, but the way you are phrasing it sounds like he was commissioned by the NEA and tax payer funds were used, but that is not the case. The NEA sponsors a contest and he won the prize money.
 
Last edited:
What? He did it to match the "Piss Christ"... Nobody is "going nuts". Man, you have become crippled in logic lately. There is no hypocrisy there, it simply mocks the idiots who support government money going to the "Piss Christ".
1989 called and wants its controversy back.
 
It was not tax payer funded, that is a lie. It was a contest sponsored by the National Endowment of the Arts and Serrano won the prize money of $15,000.

I will correct your error, but I know it does no good.

He was not given money to create this piece of art, he created it, then won first place for his photo.

spon·sor (sp
obreve.gif
n
prime.gif
s
schwa.gif
r)n.1. One who assumes responsibility for another person or a group during a period of instruction, apprenticeship, or probation.
2. One who vouches for the suitability of a candidate for admission.
3. One that finances a project or an event carried out by another person or group



With taxpayers money....

You make a distinction without a difference
 
spon·sor (sp
obreve.gif
n
prime.gif
s
schwa.gif
r)n.1. One who assumes responsibility for another person or a group during a period of instruction, apprenticeship, or probation.
2. One who vouches for the suitability of a candidate for admission.
3. One that finances a project or an event carried out by another person or group



With taxpayers money....

You make a distinction without a difference

You said exhibit, but Damo didn't. My response was to Damo's claim. Then later in thread, you claim it was tax payer funded, inferring he was paid to create it, which is wrong.

Yes, the NEA did sponsor the art show where the photo was chosen for first place, but Serrano did not receive money from the government to do the project.

This has been my claim from the first post, the fact that you are missing the boat here is not my problem.
 
I remember Christians going nuts, not killing people nuts, but ranting on TV nuts. I would support and defend the person who put Mohammed in the jar, much like I support and defend Soloman Rushdie.
Christians went "nuts" because it was paid for with tax dollars. Do you see the difference?
 
Back
Top