Media Misdirection On The Border

Flanders

Verified User
The basis for so much resistence to Trump’s Wall stems, in part, from touchy-feely mosquitoes who flit from cause to cause trying to convince everyone that their global village is the only way to go. The vast majority of Americans disagree with that media-promoted view, but are powerless to discredit it even when they think they are electing politicians who will stand firm against such a misleading utopian promise.

Because elected officials have failed American voters on defending this country’s sovereignty so many times in the past, a substantial number of private sector voters have joined the growing throng of disillusioned Americans who have turned their backs television news, and on all politics for reasons of their own. If the causes for disillusionment continues to increase in number, the day is not far off when only those people living on tax dollars will bother to vote —— and they will always vote their wallets. “It is tax revenues, Stupid!”

Parenthetically, the worst generation was populated by perverts and drug addicts. That did not stop the worst generation from telling the best generation that everyone on the planet had to join hands once a day and belt out a couple of choruses of I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony.

Anyone who did not sing along was quickly branded as a meanspirited isolationist. For example: The village bleeding hearts claimed that securing national borders against illegal immigration had nothing to do with territorial sovereignty —— it was nothing more than isolationism at its worst. The thing that scared them the most was the government stopping illegal immigration and, at the same time, shutting down entitlements. Of course, that turn of events would cut into their oh-so-compassionate protest activities because then they would have to strap on a leaf blower five days a week to make ends meet —— leaving them little time to save the world.

More than 25 million illegal alien in this country do not want the wall. Democrats want no borders so more illegal aliens can come in and vote for Democrats.

President Trump wants the wall for the wrong reason.

Trump can build his wall as wide as the Missouri and as high as the Empire State Building. That will not stop illegal aliens from climbing through, over, under, and around it. In short: No wall is stronger than free stuff.

Building —— or preventing —— a wall is media misdirection designed to take the public’s attention off everything that is needed more than a wall:

1. Repeal every open-borders law starting with this one:

https://cis.org/Report/Legacy-1965-Immigration-Act

2. Repeal every law that blocks immediate deportation.

3. Stop lawyers from getting tax dollars to pay all of those appeals illegal alien file after they are caught.

4. Make employers who hire illegals pay every cost associated with capture and deportation.

5. Confiscate real property owned by illegal aliens.

6. Pass a constitutional law against birthright citizenship for illegal aliens.

7. Stop chain migration in every instance.

8. Do the same thing President Eisenhower did.

This is what Socialists fear more than they fear a wall that is easily breached:


During the 1950s, however, this "Good Old Boy" system changed under Eisenhower – if only for about 10 years.

In 1954, Ike appointed retired Gen. Joseph "Jumpin' Joe" Swing, a former West Point classmate and veteran of the 101st Airborne, as the new INS commissioner.

Influential politicians, including Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) of Texas and Sen. Pat McCarran (D) of Nevada, favored open borders, and were dead set against strong border enforcement, Brownell said. But General Swing's close connections to the president shielded him – and the Border Patrol – from meddling by powerful political and corporate interests:



NOTE:
President Trump is stuck with Nutso and Upchuck:




One of Swing's first decisive acts was to transfer certain entrenched immigration officials out of the border area to other regions of the country where their political connections with people such as Senator Johnson would have no effect.

Then on June 17, 1954, what was called "Operation Wetback" began. Because political resistance was lower in California and Arizona, the roundup of aliens began there. Some 750 agents swept northward through agricultural areas with a goal of 1,000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Another 488,000, fearing arrest, had fled the country.

By mid-July, the crackdown extended northward into Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, and eastward to Texas.

By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 illegals had left the Lone Star State voluntarily.

Unlike today, Mexicans caught in the roundup were not simply released at the border, where they could easily reenter the US. To discourage their return, Swing arranged for buses and trains to take many aliens deep within Mexico before being set free.

Tens of thousands more were put aboard two hired ships, the Emancipation and the Mercurio. The ships ferried the aliens from Port Isabel, Texas, to Vera Cruz, Mexico, more than 500 miles south.


XXXXX

There are now said to be 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the US. Of the Mexicans who live here, an estimated 85 percent are here illegally.

One day in 1954, Border Patrol agent Walt Edwards picked up a newspaper in Big Spring, Texas, and saw some startling news. The government was launching an all-out drive to oust illegal aliens from the United States.

The orders came straight from the top, where the new president, Dwight Eisenhower, had put a former West Point classmate, Gen. Joseph Swing, in charge of immigration enforcement.

General Swing's fast-moving campaign soon secured America's borders – an accomplishment no other president has since equaled. Illegal migration had dropped 95 percent by the late 1950s.

Several retired Border Patrol agents who took part in the 1950s effort, including Mr. Edwards, say much of what Swing did could be repeated today.

"Some say we cannot send 12 million illegals now in the United States back where they came from. Of course we can!" Edwards says.

Donald Coppock, who headed the Patrol from 1960 to 1973, says that if Swing and Ike were still running immigration enforcement, "they'd be on top of this in a minute."

William Chambers, another '50s veteran, agrees. "They could do a pretty good job" sealing the border.

Edwards says: "When we start enforcing the law, these various businesses are, on their own, going to replace their [illegal] workforce with a legal workforce."

While Congress debates building a fence on the border, these veterans say other actions should have higher priority.

1. End the current practice of taking captured Mexican aliens to the border and releasing them. Instead, deport them deep into Mexico, where return to the US would be more costly.

2. Crack down hard on employers who hire illegals. Without jobs, the aliens won't come.

3. End "catch and release" for non-Mexican aliens. It is common for illegal migrants not from Mexico to be set free after their arrest if they promise to appear later before a judge. Few show up.

The Patrol veterans say enforcement could also be aided by a legalized guest- worker program that permits Mexicans to register in their country for temporary jobs in the US. Eisenhower's team ran such a program. It permitted up to 400,000 Mexicans a year to enter the US for various agriculture jobs that lasted for 12 to 52 weeks.


How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico
By John Dillin
July 6, 2006

https://scout.com/college/auburn/Bo...wer-solved-illegal-border-crossings-71325600/
 
Saudi Arabia rounds up thousands of "overstayers" every year and flies them home to their country of origin. How difficult could it be?
 

NOTE: President Trump is stuck with Nutso and Upchuck:


President Trump threw a temper tantrum to protect Americans, while Upchuck threw his tantrum so Democrats could pay for killing babies:


There is no doubt that almost all the media will blame Trump for the Democrat stubbornness because that is what they always do.

In 2015, Democrats threw a temper tantrum and threatened to shut down government if they didn’t get their special interest group (not a government agency) Planned Parenthood $500 million in taxpayer money. Isn’t that amazing, threatening to shut down government for funding a non-government agency?


December 12, 2018
Everyone should remember that Democrats threw a temper tantrum and threatened to shut down government if Planned Parenthood didn't get money
By Jack Hellner

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nt_if_planned_parenthood_didnt_get_money.html

Nutso outdid Upchuck’s vomit.


‘She’s Scared’ — Ted Cruz Criticizes Pelosi For Wanting To Turn Cameras Off During White House Meeting
11:12 PM 12/11/2018
Scott Morefield

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/11/ted-cruz-nancy-pelosi-cameras-scared/

I disagree with Senator Cruz’s reason.


I always said that Nutso suffered from constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. She was not scared —— she had another attack yesterday when she exceeded her usual wacky interpretations. Claiming transparency after she demanded that President Trump turn off the cameras makes perfect sense in Pelosi’s warped mind.

Nutso did not stop there. She want on about bipartisanship which always means Democrats get everything they want. If you doubt me try to find one piece of bipartisan legislation since the LBJ years where conservative Americans (THE MAJORITY) got anything.

Nutso was on a roll. She next claimed ownership of the very Constitution that Democrats violate every chance they get.

Nutso also criticized President Trump for passing a tax cut in the dead of night. I assume Diarrhea Mouth gave the country the ACA in broad daylight after she said. “But we have to pass it to find out what’s in it.”
 

President Trump threw a temper tantrum to protect Americans, while Upchuck threw his tantrum so Democrats could pay for killing babies:


There is no doubt that almost all the media will blame Trump for the Democrat stubbornness because that is what they always do.

In 2015, Democrats threw a temper tantrum and threatened to shut down government if they didn’t get their special interest group (not a government agency) Planned Parenthood $500 million in taxpayer money. Isn’t that amazing, threatening to shut down government for funding a non-government agency?


December 12, 2018
Everyone should remember that Democrats threw a temper tantrum and threatened to shut down government if Planned Parenthood didn't get money
By Jack Hellner

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...nt_if_planned_parenthood_didnt_get_money.html

Nutso outdid Upchuck’s vomit.


‘She’s Scared’ — Ted Cruz Criticizes Pelosi For Wanting To Turn Cameras Off During White House Meeting
11:12 PM 12/11/2018
Scott Morefield

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/11/ted-cruz-nancy-pelosi-cameras-scared/

I disagree with Senator Cruz’s reason.


I always said that Nutso suffered from constipation of the brain and diarrhea of the mouth. She was not scared —— she had another attack yesterday when she exceeded her usual wacky interpretations. Claiming transparency after she demanded that President Trump turn off the cameras makes perfect sense in Pelosi’s warped mind.

Nutso did not stop there. She want on about bipartisanship which always means Democrats get everything they want. If you doubt me try to find one piece of bipartisan legislation since the LBJ years where conservative Americans (THE MAJORITY) got anything.

Nutso was on a roll. She next claimed ownership of the very Constitution that Democrats violate every chance they get.

Nutso also criticized President Trump for passing a tax cut in the dead of night. I assume Diarrhea Mouth gave the country the ACA in broad daylight after she said. “But we have to pass it to find out what’s in it.”

poor goyim
 
FACT:

Republican own both the House and Senate
Republican have the Presidency

When in charge ... take charge, or step aside
 
I cannot agree with El Rushbo on this one:

“The wall is the single greatest obstruction to the future of the Democrat Party. They do not want a wall. They will not support a wall. A wall would bring about the end of the Democrat Party.


Wall 'single greatest obstruction to the future' of the Democratic Party
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 12/13/2018 @ 5:36 pm

https://www.wnd.com/2018/12/wall-single-greatest-obstruction-to-the-future-of-the-democrat-party/

The Democrat Party’s political agenda will continue to grow in strength so long as the laws and regulations that gave this country open borders are not repealed:

Trump can build his wall as wide as the Missouri and as high as the Empire State Building. That will not stop illegal aliens from climbing through, over, under, and around it. In short: No wall is stronger than free stuff.

Building —— or preventing —— a wall is media misdirection designed to take the public’s attention off everything that is needed more than a wall:

Unfortunately, Nutso Nancy Pelosi now has at least two more years to block repeal as well as block funding for the wall. In fact, two years is an underestimate since Republicans had all three branches of government several times in recent years, yet they did not repeal a single destructive immigration law. In fact, the scum running both parties would see this country go up in flames before they repeal anything that exposes them as U.N. stooges.

210591_5_.jpg


Bottom line: Repeal will recapture viable immigration policies —— policies that worked until 1965. Nothing will kill the Democrat Party faster than showing the American people proof of how much better off they are after mass migrations are stopped. That is the first step toward reclaiming sovereignty. Reclaiming sovereignty from the United Nations is the red line Democrats will never cross.
 
Democrats are not hypocrites —— they are liars:


Trump Shares Old Videos Of Schumer, Hillary, Obama Supporting Border Security
5:48 PM 12/13/2018 | Politics
Benny Johnson

https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/13/trump-schumer-hillary-obama-border/

If Democrats wanted border security illegal aliens never would have got in to begin with. Trump does not get it. Any wall Democrats ‘HELP’ build will have fewer holes in it than:


slide_6.jpg



Nutso outdid Upchuck’s vomit.

p.s. Calling Nutso a bag lady slanders bag ladies everywhere:


pelosi-melania-trump-red-coat.jpg


Who Wore It Best? Beautiful Melania Trump or Bag Lady Nancy Pelosi in Her Boxy Red Coat?
by Jim Hoft
December 14, 2018

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...r-bag-lady-nancy-pelosi-in-her-boxy-red-coat/
 
A wall would bring about the end of the Democrat Party.

A border wall along with deporting illegals would set the Democrat party back 50 or 60 years. Democrats don't respect our nation's heritage, they just want to welcome Hispanics cause they vote for Democrat politicians.
 
The basis for so much resistence to Trump’s Wall stems, in part, from touchy-feely mosquitoes who flit from cause to cause trying to convince everyone that their global village is the only way to go. The vast majority of Americans disagree with that media-promoted view, but are powerless to discredit it even when they think they are electing politicians who will stand firm against such a misleading utopian promise.

Because elected officials have failed American voters on defending this country’s sovereignty so many times in the past, a substantial number of private sector voters have joined the growing throng of disillusioned Americans who have turned their backs television news, and on all politics for reasons of their own. If the causes for disillusionment continues to increase in number, the day is not far off when only those people living on tax dollars will bother to vote —— and they will always vote their wallets. “It is tax revenues, Stupid!”

Parenthetically, the worst generation was populated by perverts and drug addicts. That did not stop the worst generation from telling the best generation that everyone on the planet had to join hands once a day and belt out a couple of choruses of I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony.

Anyone who did not sing along was quickly branded as a meanspirited isolationist. For example: The village bleeding hearts claimed that securing national borders against illegal immigration had nothing to do with territorial sovereignty —— it was nothing more than isolationism at its worst. The thing that scared them the most was the government stopping illegal immigration and, at the same time, shutting down entitlements. Of course, that turn of events would cut into their oh-so-compassionate protest activities because then they would have to strap on a leaf blower five days a week to make ends meet —— leaving them little time to save the world.

More than 25 million illegal alien in this country do not want the wall. Democrats want no borders so more illegal aliens can come in and vote for Democrats.

President Trump wants the wall for the wrong reason.

Trump can build his wall as wide as the Missouri and as high as the Empire State Building. That will not stop illegal aliens from climbing through, over, under, and around it. In short: No wall is stronger than free stuff.

Building —— or preventing —— a wall is media misdirection designed to take the public’s attention off everything that is needed more than a wall:

1. Repeal every open-borders law starting with this one:

https://cis.org/Report/Legacy-1965-Immigration-Act

2. Repeal every law that blocks immediate deportation.

3. Stop lawyers from getting tax dollars to pay all of those appeals illegal alien file after they are caught.

4. Make employers who hire illegals pay every cost associated with capture and deportation.

5. Confiscate real property owned by illegal aliens.

6. Pass a constitutional law against birthright citizenship for illegal aliens.

7. Stop chain migration in every instance.

8. Do the same thing President Eisenhower did.

This is what Socialists fear more than they fear a wall that is easily breached:


During the 1950s, however, this "Good Old Boy" system changed under Eisenhower – if only for about 10 years.

In 1954, Ike appointed retired Gen. Joseph "Jumpin' Joe" Swing, a former West Point classmate and veteran of the 101st Airborne, as the new INS commissioner.

Influential politicians, including Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) of Texas and Sen. Pat McCarran (D) of Nevada, favored open borders, and were dead set against strong border enforcement, Brownell said. But General Swing's close connections to the president shielded him – and the Border Patrol – from meddling by powerful political and corporate interests:



NOTE:
President Trump is stuck with Nutso and Upchuck:




One of Swing's first decisive acts was to transfer certain entrenched immigration officials out of the border area to other regions of the country where their political connections with people such as Senator Johnson would have no effect.

Then on June 17, 1954, what was called "Operation Wetback" began. Because political resistance was lower in California and Arizona, the roundup of aliens began there. Some 750 agents swept northward through agricultural areas with a goal of 1,000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Another 488,000, fearing arrest, had fled the country.

By mid-July, the crackdown extended northward into Utah, Nevada, and Idaho, and eastward to Texas.

By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 illegals had left the Lone Star State voluntarily.

Unlike today, Mexicans caught in the roundup were not simply released at the border, where they could easily reenter the US. To discourage their return, Swing arranged for buses and trains to take many aliens deep within Mexico before being set free.

Tens of thousands more were put aboard two hired ships, the Emancipation and the Mercurio. The ships ferried the aliens from Port Isabel, Texas, to Vera Cruz, Mexico, more than 500 miles south.


XXXXX

There are now said to be 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the US. Of the Mexicans who live here, an estimated 85 percent are here illegally.

One day in 1954, Border Patrol agent Walt Edwards picked up a newspaper in Big Spring, Texas, and saw some startling news. The government was launching an all-out drive to oust illegal aliens from the United States.

The orders came straight from the top, where the new president, Dwight Eisenhower, had put a former West Point classmate, Gen. Joseph Swing, in charge of immigration enforcement.

General Swing's fast-moving campaign soon secured America's borders – an accomplishment no other president has since equaled. Illegal migration had dropped 95 percent by the late 1950s.

Several retired Border Patrol agents who took part in the 1950s effort, including Mr. Edwards, say much of what Swing did could be repeated today.

"Some say we cannot send 12 million illegals now in the United States back where they came from. Of course we can!" Edwards says.

Donald Coppock, who headed the Patrol from 1960 to 1973, says that if Swing and Ike were still running immigration enforcement, "they'd be on top of this in a minute."

William Chambers, another '50s veteran, agrees. "They could do a pretty good job" sealing the border.

Edwards says: "When we start enforcing the law, these various businesses are, on their own, going to replace their [illegal] workforce with a legal workforce."

While Congress debates building a fence on the border, these veterans say other actions should have higher priority.

1. End the current practice of taking captured Mexican aliens to the border and releasing them. Instead, deport them deep into Mexico, where return to the US would be more costly.

2. Crack down hard on employers who hire illegals. Without jobs, the aliens won't come.

3. End "catch and release" for non-Mexican aliens. It is common for illegal migrants not from Mexico to be set free after their arrest if they promise to appear later before a judge. Few show up.

The Patrol veterans say enforcement could also be aided by a legalized guest- worker program that permits Mexicans to register in their country for temporary jobs in the US. Eisenhower's team ran such a program. It permitted up to 400,000 Mexicans a year to enter the US for various agriculture jobs that lasted for 12 to 52 weeks.


How Eisenhower solved illegal border crossings from Mexico
By John Dillin
July 6, 2006

https://scout.com/college/auburn/Bo...wer-solved-illegal-border-crossings-71325600/

Ah, could you just summarize that in a paragraph or two, I really don't want to read thru some college kid's paper on immigration
 
The wall is symbolic. You cannot stop people from coming here. The drugs are trucked over or flown in at usual entry points. Want to stop drugs, then deal with American addiction.
Chain migration? Trump's mother came her through it. Her family came over and then sent for her.Why does that scare rightys?
Illegals come here for a better life. They seek jobs. American companies give them to illegals because they can intimidate and cheat them out of the very low wages they earn. Make it a financial liability to hire illegals instead of a profitable move. Fine them heavily and jail execs who cheat.
 
Ah, could you just summarize that in a paragraph or two, I really don't want to read thru some college kid's paper on immigration

To archives: Do not read my threads at all. I do not write messages for bumper sticker mentality halfwits.

You cannot stop people from coming here.

To Nordberg: But you sure as hell can send them back where they came from.

Illegals come here for a better life. They seek jobs.

To Nordberg: Today’s immigrants come here to get on welfare state programs.

See number 16 permalink in this thread:


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?108632-The-U-N-%92s-Prize&p=2770729#post2770729
 
The wall is symbolic. You cannot stop people from coming here. The drugs are trucked over or flown in at usual entry points. Want to stop drugs, then deal with American addiction.
Chain migration? Trump's mother came her through it. Her family came over and then sent for her.Why does that scare rightys?
Illegals come here for a better life. They seek jobs. American companies give them to illegals because they can intimidate and cheat them out of the very low wages they earn. Make it a financial liability to hire illegals instead of a profitable move. Fine them heavily and jail execs who cheat.

The Wall has been downgraded to steel slats and Mexico is clearly not paying for any fucking wall. But the american public is by and large an ignorant, anxious, fearful, utterly subjugated population socialized to always defer to their ruling aristocracy no matter the detrimental effects upon society as a whole.
 
About 50,000 Canadians work in America. I can see a crying need for another wall. They are taking away American jobs.
 
About 50,000 Canadians work in America. I can see a crying need for another wall. They are taking away American jobs.

To Nordberg: How many Canadians are here illegally compared to 30,000,000 illegal aliens?

How many Canadians are on welfare state programs? If every one of your 50,000 came here to access welfare state programs it would be a drop in the bucket compared to billions of tax dollars illegal aliens collect every year in one form or another. Free education alone is costing American taxpayers billions every year.

Incidentally, Canadians do not come here for free healthcare, while illegal aliens are flooding our hospitals and free clinics. If illegal aliens from Central America want socialized medicine this country should send those caravans all the way to the Canadian border.
 
Back
Top