Media’s long con to bury Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal

[Truth Detector]

Much like the Russia HOAX to spy on and destroy the Trump campaign in 2016, and then the Mueller investigation HOAX in order to handcuff the Trump Presidency, two fake impeachment trials containing nothing but lies and hearsay, we now have the 2020 election HOAX where officials lied about the Hunter laptop in order to promote Biden's candidacy and give him a talking point in the debates.

Democrats are shameless in their hypocrisy, dishonesty and efforts to divide and destroy this nation.

Media’s long con to bury Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal

It’s the biggest con ever perpetuated by the national media.

For all of their hysterics over “disinformation” and “collusion,” we know now that they were indisputably the most guilty of both.
............................

To recap: Journalists were coached on how to shift the discussion away from newsworthy materials detrimental to a specific person (Biden) and focus instead on the means by which they were obtained.

That’s exactly what they did and the change in reporting standards were expressly made to tilt the election.

https://nypost.com/2023/05/05/medias-long-con-to-bury-hunter-bidens-laptop-scandal/

 

[Truth Detector]

Why anyone would ever trust any of the media elites or fake journalists to tell the truth defies good common sense.

The hypocritical major-media plot in advance to suppress The Post’s Hunter Biden reporting

Remember when journalists were supposed to speak truth to power, no matter the cost?

Those were the days, huh?

In 1971, The New York Times printed an internal study the United States conducted about our failures in the Vietnam War.

These Pentagon Papers were leaked by a RAND analyst who had access to the classified documents, Daniel Ellsberg.

This was incredibly controversial.
...................

For decades, the media held to this “Pentagon Papers standard” — that it didn’t matter HOW information was acquired, as long as it was true.

Whatever Edward Snowden’s motives, for instance, it was more important to know about the NSA’s spy program.

That is, until Democrats looked bad.

In 2016, internal emails from the Democratic National Committee were leaked by Russian hackers, and widely reported.

The emails were legitimate.

But after Donald Trump was elected, the media panicked.

It’s one thing to expose the US government; how dare you do it to Hillary Clinton!

In 2020, a “working group” at the Aspen Institute, which included representatives of the Times, the Washington Post, the Daily Beast and content moderators from Facebook and Twitter, proposed a new standard.

They roleplayed how social media and reporters should react to leaked information about Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.

As revealed by reporter Matt Taibbi, they concluded that the Pentagon Papers standard should be scrapped: The press SHOULD consider where information came from and decide not to publish, even if it was true.


https://nypost.com/2023/05/05/the-h...to-suppress-the-posts-hunter-biden-reporting/