Medical Questionaire

Since I am the one who posted this and I am the only one (besides you) who sees this as an issue, your post can only be directed at me (or at least including me). Please show me any examples of my being in favor of Obamacare, in favor of more gov't intrusion, or examples of me clamoring for more gov't involvement. Otherwise, your post is nonsense.

So you oppose government healthcare and Obamacare?

And at this point it is moot. Because this is what it is getting you.

I suggest you make no waves and just accept it. They are doing it for your own good and the good of society. Why can't you see that?
 
I am going in for my annual physical and to check on a few things. Since I have relocated, I am using a new medical group. They emailed me a Medical History Questionaire. Most of it is pretty standard stuff.

But one section is called PEVENTION. It is a series of Yes/No questions. Most seem reasonable, like asking if I smoke, drink alcohol, drink coffee, have a "Living Will" ect. But one question is "If there is a gun in your home, is it out of children's reach and unloaded?".

WTF?

First of all, in my home the answer would be yes and no. It is out of reach but it is loaded.

But my main question is what the hell does this have to do with my medical history? I didn't answer the question, since I think we can proceed with my physical without the doctor knowing about how I store firearms.




Has anyone else run into this question at their doctor's office?
If you have children, many paediatricians will not accept them as patients if you are a gun owner, it is possible they will refuse to treat you also.
A part of Eric holders make smokers and gun owners cower campaign.

Tell them you don't own firearms.
 
If you have children, many paediatricians will not accept them as patients if you are a gun owner, it is possible they will refuse to treat you also.
A part of Eric holders make smokers and gun owners cower campaign.

Tell them you don't own firearms.


Just an FYI, James, but it is very possible, nay, likely, that pediatricians will not treat you because you're an adult and they're pediatricians.

Also, too, LOL.


Edit: I'm assuming you are an adult, which assumption may not be warranted given your posting history, but nevertheless . . .
 
maybe because certain health issues effect you mental health state.

People with guns in the home are far more likely to kill themselves or a family memeber
Bullshit.
Owning a gun has no bearing on mental state.
 
http://tech.mit.edu/V120/N3/dep1.3n.html


Depression Most Prevalent Mental Disorder in America

By Karyn Lu
This article is the first in a series regarding depression and mental health issues. It presents a general description of depression and its symptoms; future articles will discuss topics such as mental health and support services at MIT.


Clinical depression is far more menacing than just the passing “blues” that everyone experiences at some time or another in their lives. Depression is not a sign of personal weakness, and people suffering from depression cannot simply “pull themselves together.”

In actuality, depression is the most common serious brain disease in the U.S. today. Major (also called unipolar) depression, a physical illness whose principal manifestations are psychological, involves frequent episodes of intense hopelessness and lowered self-esteem. It can effect an individual's mood, body, behavior, and mind; when left untreated, depression may eventually lead to suicide.

Major depression is recognized as the most prevalent type of mood disorder today. It is estimated that 17 percent of the U.S. population (between 5-12 percent of men and 10-20 percent of women) will suffer from a major depressive episode at least once in their lifetime.

According to the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) of the American Psychiatric Association, the most widely accepted guide for classifying psychiatric and psychological disorders today, a major depressive episode is diagnosed by the presence of at least five of these nine symptoms during the same two-week period:



1. Depressed mood

2. Reduced interest in almost all

activities

3. Unintended significant weight gain or weight loss

4. Insomnia, or sleeping too much

5. Increased or decreased motor activity

6. Fatigue or loss of energy

7. Feelings of worthlessness or guilt

8. Reduced ability to concentrate or think

9. Recurrent thoughts of death
Sounds like its what Obama wants for American workers!
 
Depression diagnosis is part of healthcare.
KNOWING what means you have at your disposal to hurt yourself or others would make a diagnosis of depression much more urgent in your case.

That is one of the most insane things you have ever stated. Which is saying a lot.
 
I am going in for my annual physical and to check on a few things. Since I have relocated, I am using a new medical group. They emailed me a Medical History Questionaire. Most of it is pretty standard stuff.

But one section is called PEVENTION. It is a series of Yes/No questions. Most seem reasonable, like asking if I smoke, drink alcohol, drink coffee, have a "Living Will" ect. But one question is "If there is a gun in your home, is it out of children's reach and unloaded?".

WTF?

First of all, in my home the answer would be yes and no. It is out of reach but it is loaded.

But my main question is what the hell does this have to do with my medical history? I didn't answer the question, since I think we can proceed with my physical without the doctor knowing about how I store firearms.




Has anyone else run into this question at their doctor's office?
I wouldn't worry to much about it. It's all about statistics and prevention. The annual gun injury rate in our nation is about 10/100,000 persons per year. That's for the entire generation at large. However that rate goes up significantly for gun owners. For a single gun owner with no children the gun injury rate is around 40/100,000 persons per year. With children in the household the rate goes up to around 80/100,000. For households with more than one gun the rate is closer to 200/100,000. That's pretty close to the annual mortality rate for cancer (all types).

It's a pretty obvious statitical matter. If you have a gun in your household the statistical probability of you or a member of that household having a gun related injury are substantially higher than those who don't. So to repeat that. If you have more than one gun in your home, the statistical probability of a gun related injury are around 180/100,000. If you have no guns in your home the probability of having a gun related injury is around 10/100,000. That is the odds of having a gun related injury are about 20 times less if you don't posess a firearm in your home.
 
I wouldn't worry to much about it. It's all about statistics and prevention. The annual gun injury rate in our nation is about 10/100,000 persons per year. That's for the entire generation at large. However that rate goes up significantly for gun owners. For a single gun owner with no children the gun injury rate is around 40/100,000 persons per year. With children in the household the rate goes up to around 80/100,000. For households with more than one gun the rate is closer to 200/100,000. That's pretty close to the annual mortality rate for cancer (all types).

It's a pretty obvious statitical matter. If you have a gun in your household the statistical probability of you or a member of that household having a gun related injury are substantially higher than those who don't. So to repeat that. If you have more than one gun in your home, the statistical probability of a gun related injury are around 180/100,000. If you have no guns in your home the probability of having a gun related injury is around 10/100,000. That is the odds of having a gun related injury are about 20 times less if you don't posess a firearm in your home.


Bullshit. There's no way this doctor is really just engaging in basic harm prevention based on statistical incidence of gun-related injuries in households with guns. He's a cog in Eric Holder's gun-grabbing machine and you're just covering for him.
 
I wouldn't worry to much about it. It's all about statistics and prevention. The annual gun injury rate in our nation is about 10/100,000 persons per year. That's for the entire generation at large. However that rate goes up significantly for gun owners. For a single gun owner with no children the gun injury rate is around 40/100,000 persons per year. With children in the household the rate goes up to around 80/100,000. For households with more than one gun the rate is closer to 200/100,000. That's pretty close to the annual mortality rate for cancer (all types).

It's a pretty obvious statitical matter. If you have a gun in your household the statistical probability of you or a member of that household having a gun related injury are substantially higher than those who don't. So to repeat that. If you have more than one gun in your home, the statistical probability of a gun related injury are around 180/100,000. If you have no guns in your home the probability of having a gun related injury is around 10/100,000. That is the odds of having a gun related injury are about 20 times less if you don't posess a firearm in your home.

link to your stats...
 
Bullshit. There's no way this doctor is really just engaging in basic harm prevention based on statistical incidence of gun-related injuries in households with guns. He's a cog in Eric Holder's gun-grabbing machine and you're just covering for him.

Must defend Obama administration... must defend Obama administration
 
statistically speaking, those with knives in their homes are more likely to get injured by knives than those without knives in their homes.

statistically speaking, those with poodles in their homes are more likely to get injured by poodles than those without poodles in their homes.

statistically speaking, those with tighty whiteys in their homes are more likely to spend the night alone than those without tighty whiteys in their homes.
 
statistically speaking, those with knives in their homes are more likely to get injured by knives than those without knives in their homes.

statistically speaking, those with poodles in their homes are more likely to get injured by poodles than those without poodles in their homes.

statistically speaking, those with tighty whiteys in their homes are more likely to spend the night alone than those without tighty whiteys in their homes.
True but they don't have the morbidity and mortality rates of smokers and gun owners.
 
Bullshit. There's no way this doctor is really just engaging in basic harm prevention based on statistical incidence of gun-related injuries in households with guns. He's a cog in Eric Holder's gun-grabbing machine and you're just covering for him.
LOL No man! It's true!! The stats don't lie. Hey I know this from my own personal experience. If I owned a gun my wife would probably have shot my ass by now!!!
 
I would check "no guns in the house" and "they are not loaded," but then I would check "they ARE in reach of children" just for fun.
 
BTW, I'm no gun nut but I'm not exactly anti-gun either. I've owned rifles and shot guns, hunted for deer, pheasant, critters and I've enjoyed skeet shooting, target shooting, turkey shoots, etc. When I was in my early thirties I traded in my gun and fishing rod for a bicycle as my favorite out door activity.
 
Back
Top