Men

Jack said:
It seems to be your main thesis of 'anger'.
But, I can understand that if you're a 'Rock Pusher' building the 'Pyramid', you may be locked into your Station in Life.
You may want to consider joining some 'Revolutionary' organization that has like-minded Members. (?)
You could formulate a 'solution', and at the minimum, be able to commensurate with others in a similar plight.
Click to expand...

The solution is not achievable by me or anyone else. It'd require undoing 90+ years of events and build up. It'd require nuclear war against China in the 1950s. I may as well ask the Sun to explode as tk attempt to affect any positive change.
 
Matt Dillon said:
I think there's a picture of you in the Dictionary under "Nihilist".
I'm gonna lay this on you, and you're gonna hate it..

There is nothing without Hope.

In my world Hope is a hot blonde slut. Very hot.
Unfortunately I'm talking about the idea of hope.
Click to expand...

And there is no hope beyojd a fools hope.
 
/MSG/ said:
And there is no hope beyojd a fools hope.
Click to expand...

Perhaps not everybody's a fool, brah.

A fool's Hope is still pretty fucking hot, and how much of a fool can he be, when he's had her for decades n shit?

I like the dude, he still has my bestest guitar I had ever.
 
/MSG/ said:
Jack said:
It seems to be your main thesis of 'anger'.
But, I can understand that if you're a 'Rock Pusher' building the 'Pyramid', you may be locked into your Station in Life.
You may want to consider joining some 'Revolutionary' organization that has like-minded Members. (?)
You could formulate a 'solution', and at the minimum, be able to commensurate with others in a similar plight.
Click to expand...
The solution is not achievable by me or anyone else. It'd require undoing 90+ years of events and build up. It'd require nuclear war against China in the 1950s. I may as well ask the Sun to explode as tk attempt to affect any positive change.
Click to expand...
Like the Pyramids and Rome, big problems are created and dismantled brick by brick. Nuking them works, but often has worse ramifications. Better to just work together and restructure.
 
/MSG/ said:
You certainly are.
Click to expand...

That's not what your mom said as she swallowed my choad.
She's pretty happy with the situation.
iu
 
/MSG/ said:
The party leaders sure, but the 1.5 Billion that aren't,? No, they don't expect a human standard of living. Why would they? Chinese history is one plague after the next with civil wars and cannibalism in between.

But they already own us anyways. We should have nuked Beijing in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

Honestly, in hindsight, letting Japan take over China would have been better. If we had forced Japan to give up most of the territories it invaded but let them have China, the world would probably be a much better place. Also, Imperialist Japan would have been a good ally against the Soviets.
 
Woko Haram said:
Honestly, in hindsight, letting Japan take over China would have been better. If we had forced Japan to give up most of the territories it invaded but let them have China, the world would probably be a much better place. Also, Imperialist Japan would have been a good ally against the Soviets.
Click to expand...

In hindsight, bashing baby Adolf's head against the floor would have been better. Woulda, coulda, shoulda.
 
Woko Haram said:
Honestly, in hindsight, letting Japan take over China would have been better. If we had forced Japan to give up most of the territories it invaded but let them have China, the world would probably be a much better place. Also, Imperialist Japan would have been a good ally against the Soviets.
Click to expand...

Yes, but again, can't change the tracks our train is on now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top