It's an interesting question, and it remains an open question at this time.Some argue that quantum mechanics is deterministic. But I think randomness is part of nature.
It's an interesting question, and it remains an open question at this time.Some argue that quantum mechanics is deterministic. But I think randomness is part of nature.
Again, mental phenomena is testing to seven sigma. We can't deny what science is finding out about the human mind.You never once discussed philosophy. I think you are hallucinating.
sorry, seriously, I can't deal with your mental illness anymoreAgain, mental phenomena is testing to seven sigma. We can't deny what science is finding out about the human mind.
You Kant deal with any philosophical exchange.sorry, seriously, I can't deal with your mental illness anymore
You are mentally ill.You Kant deal with any philosophical exchange.
Gravity is for all intents, instantaneous.How does "gravity" refute Bell's theorem?
Okay, and how does that refute Bell's theorem?Gravity is for all intents, instantaneous.
For Bell, the basics are locality (the belief that things can’t influence each other instantaneously across space)Okay, and how does that refute Bell's theorem?
I see. Bell is refuting the idea of locality. Sorry, a bit confusing. He is saying the basic principles he is contesting is locality.For Bell, the basics are locality (the belief that things can’t influence each other instantaneously across space)
From the OP.
Gravity is instantaneous and influences things across space. If you were to convert a large amount of energy to mass you get lots of gravity and it affects everything around it across space. That refutes his idea of locality.
"This meant that locality and realism can’t both be features of reality —"For Bell, the basics are locality (the belief that things can’t influence each other instantaneously across space)
From the OP.
Gravity is instantaneous and influences things across space. If you were to convert a large amount of energy to mass you get lots of gravity and it affects everything around it across space. That refutes his idea of locality.
The gravitational field is felt everywhere in space, but if the source of gravity were removed, it's effect wouldn't be instantaneous everywhere. If the sun suddenly disappeared, the Earth would continue it's elliptical orbit for several minutes, before momentum carried it off in a ~ straight line. Information cannot travel faster than lightFor Bell, the basics are locality (the belief that things can’t influence each other instantaneously across space)
From the OP.
Gravity is instantaneous and influences things across space. If you were to convert a large amount of energy to mass you get lots of gravity and it affects everything around it across space. That refutes his idea of locality.
But that's not due to gravity, that's due to momentum / inertia and centripetal force.The gravitational field is felt everywhere in space, but if the source of gravity were removed, it's effect wouldn't be instantaneous everywhere. If the sun suddenly disappeared, the Earth would continue it's elliptical orbit for several minutes, before momentum carried it off in a ~ straight line. Information cannot travel faster than light
Right, mass exerts a predictable deformation on spacetime, but does not propagate at infinite velocity. Gravity, gravitons, and gravitational waves are either assumed or experimentally determined to propagate at the speed of light.But that's not due to gravity, that's due to momentum / inertia and centripetal force.
The key word there is assumed. We really don't know enough about how gravity actually works and is generated to know that for sure--yet.Right, mass exerts a predictable deformation on spacetime, but does not propagate at infinite velocity. Gravity, gravitons, and gravitational waves are either assumed or experimentally determined to propagate at the speed of light.
The speed of gravitational waves has been experimentally determined to be approximately the speed of light.The key word there is assumed. We really don't know enough about how gravity actually works and is generated to know that for sure--yet.
Article talks about gravity a few places.The speed of gravitational waves has been experimentally determined to be approximately the speed of light.
I didn't read the article, but any particle in the presence of in a gravitational field, or an electrical field, or a magnetic field is going to feel it instantaneously. I don't know why that even has to be pointed out.
I guess I don't understand exactly how metaphysics is supposed to help in the search for a theory of quantum gravity.Article talks about gravity a few places.
"Brukner laments that the implications of experimental metaphysics haven’t yet been fully incorporated into the rest of physics at large — especially, in his view, to the detriment of research on the quantum nature of gravity. “This is really a pity, because we end up with wrong pictures of, say, how the vacuum looks, or what goes on in a black hole, where they are described without any reference to modes of observation,” he said. “I don’t think that we will make significant progress in these fields until we really do much work on the theory of measurement.”
The article has almost nothing to do with gravity.I guess I don't understand exactly how metaphysics is supposed to help in the search for a theory of quantum gravity.