Mini-series WACO coming out in january. Bill Clinton's mass murder of 80 americans

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Biden likes little girls
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt6040674/

This will be interesting though i expect a whitewash. Back in 1993 bill clinton sent TANKS into the building in waco texas where approximately 100 people were living and burned 80 of them alive - 25 of them kids. The victims were christians and gun-owners, the two people liberals hate most of all. Naturally the news media called them radicals and child-molesters and completely supported the killings.
 
they built the house that burned

they used oil lamps in a substandard building that was practically desinged to GO UP in seconds



you hate this country

just move already
 
For the OP.

my-fucking-brain-hurts-stop-talking-dumbass.jpg
 
4 ATF agents were killed and 16 wounded. They were trying to give a warrant over child abuse, which was true. Koresh was a kid diddler. They should not have done a raid.
they could have starved them out. But I did not see Clinton driving a tank?
 
Nordberg said:
4 ATF agents were killed and 16 wounded. They were trying to give a warrant over child abuse, which was true. Koresh was a kid diddler. They should not have done a raid.
they could have starved them out. But I did not see Clinton driving a tank?
Click to expand...

There's not a shred of evidence for the child-molesting charge. And besides what was clinton's answer? He BURNED THE KIDS ALIVE!!!
 
Nordberg said:
4 ATF agents were killed and 16 wounded. They were trying to give a warrant over child abuse, which was true. Koresh was a kid diddler. They should not have done a raid.
they could have starved them out. But I did not see Clinton driving a tank?
Click to expand...
first off, idiot, you probably weren't old enough to have watched it happen on television because you clearly don't know the facts.

For example, the BATF claimed that the Branch Davidians possessed machine guns without paying the required federal tax and filling in the proper registration forms. So a tax case worth less than $10,000 led to a 76-man helicopter, machine gun, and grenade assault on a home in which 2/3 of the occupants were women and children. — Dave Kopel and Dr. Michael S. Brown, Prohibition Fever, NationalReview.com

the whole child abuse issue didn't even surface until AFTER the PR raid went bad.

posse comitatus, much? OR are you going to be one of those slaves to the state that accepts that this only means military personnel and NOT military equipment?
 
"Back in 1993 bill clinton sent TANKS into the building" TK #1
Click to expand...
a) I recall only one track-laying vehicle. The government resorted to it after a 7 week standoff.

b) While the U.S. president may be deemed ultimately responsible for occurrences during his administration, even Janet Reno may not have had direct participatory control over those events; even if she was negligent in not doing so
"approximately 100 people were living and burned 80 of them alive - 25 of them kids." TK
Click to expand...
Whether some were captive victims I don't know.
But some were there by choice. In one notable case, a Davidian exited the building while the track was aerating it, and the Davidian circled around, and re-entered the building, to avoid "rescue" by the siege-laying troops.
"The victims were christians and gun-owners, the two people liberals hate most of all." TK
Click to expand...
An excellent example of your bias confirmation. But:

c) Clinton is a Christian. The Holy Bible Clinton took his oath of Presidential oath of office on was a Clinton family heirloom.

d) It was not merely that guns were in residence, but that automatic weapons were illegally in residence, thus the raid.
It was not motivated by petty, trivial partisan antagonism as you suggest. David Koresh / Howell was in substantive violation of U.S. federal firearms law; thus the hideously bungled BATF raid.
"Naturally the news media called them radicals and child-molesters and completely supported the killings." TK
Click to expand...
You've used the superlative "completely" here.
Therefore any account of it you quote should demonstrate that.
So only one quotation would be necessary.

Please pardon me if I don't hold my breath. My invitation / challenge to you to is sincere. But I know jive talking BS artists when I encounter them.
You won't post evidence to support your claim, because you can't, because there isn't.

I have long championed the plight of this monstrous example of genocide; your tax dollars at work.
But it would not occur to me to opportunistically use this tragedy as a venue to press my own personal agenda. To do so would be to cheapen both the memory of the stricken, and the advocated cause.
 
Those who might watch probably already have their minds made up, and judging by the responses, won't change it either. Some will hate it, some will love it, the rest of us won't care.
I lived close to that place in the day and it was too real for too many of us. I won't be watching.
 
Lovebug said:
Those who might watch probably already have their minds made up, and judging by the responses, won't change it either.
Click to expand...

Well of course, that's true. I'm not gonna watch it to find out what "really" happened. I'll watch it to see how much media bias there is. The press loved clinton. Only reason they focused on the monica scandals was to distract america from things like waco and the 500,000 kids his administration ADMITTED they killed in iraq.
 
"The press loved clinton. Only reason they focused on the monica scandals was to distract america from things like waco and the 500,000 kids his administration ADMITTED they killed in iraq." TK #14
Click to expand...
U.S. President Clinton killed a half-million human children in Iraq?!

Incident to WHAT ?!?!

The U.S. had no significant military presence in Iraq until long after President Clinton left office.
 
sear said:
U.S. President Clinton killed a half-million human children in Iraq?!
The U.S. had no significant military presence in Iraq until long after President Clinton left office.
Click to expand...

Madeleine Albright admitted that on tv back in 1996. 500,000 kids killed mainly by the sanctions but also by bombings. Clinton dropped bombs on iraq nearly every day for 8 years.
 
"Madeleine Albright admitted that on tv back in 1996. 500,000 kids killed mainly by the sanctions but also by bombings. Clinton dropped bombs on iraq nearly every day for 8 years." TK #16
Click to expand...
It's a very well kept secret.

Thank god we have pillars of absolute moral rectitude and factual perfection to make clear in all cases the manifold flaws of your enemies.

You be sure and have yourself one marvelous Christmas.

Ok cupcake?
 
sear said:
It's a very well kept secret.

Thank god we have pillars of absolute moral rectitude and factual perfection to make clear in all cases the manifold flaws of your enemies.

You be sure and have yourself one marvelous Christmas.

Ok cupcake?
Click to expand...

100% deflection to avoid accepting responsibility. you should be a politician. the democrats and liberals would love you.
 
"100% deflection to avoid accepting responsibility. you should be a politician. the democrats and liberals would love you." SY #18
Click to expand...
Pseud aside, that's precisely the type of reply I'd expect from someone that's not as smart as me.

For the allegation is that CLINTON killed a half million Iraqi children with trade sanctions & near daily bombings.

a) If the trade sanctions were unilateral *, then all the other nations on Earth could simply have ignored them, bought their Similac from France, or Spain or Brazil.
But the sanctions against Iraq were U.N. sanctions. And President Clinton was not president of the U.N. President Clinton was twice elected president of the United States of America.

b) TK #16 asserts:
"Clinton dropped bombs on iraq nearly every day for 8 years."
Click to expand...
b1) Not that I recall.
I recall the U.S. & coalition forces patrolling North and South No-Fly zones.
I even remember occasional reports of Iraqi radar painting such airborne coalition patrol.
And I remember reports of those aggressive acts being punished with destruction.

BUT !!

That was FAR from " Clinton dropped bombs on iraq nearly every day for 8 years. " Half a dozen may be more like it.

b2) But in any case, it was a U.N. coalition. Blaming President Clinton as the sole responsible party is absurd. Who do you think you're fooling?

c) Literally millions have been reported starved to death in North Korea, incident to sanctions in place against the Kim Jong regime for generations.

So you quibble about a half million deaths you falsely blame on Clinton in Iraq, but ignore the millions dead in North Korea, due to sanctions that have been in place during both Democrat presidencies and Republican presidencies alike.

I see through your self-serving lies and deceptions as if they were pure optical glass.

But you're so self-deluded your comment is:
"100% deflection to avoid accepting responsibility. you should be a politician. the democrats and liberals would love you." SY #18
Click to expand...
Beyond pathetic!

Who ties your shoes for you? Or have you given up, and simply wear Loafers?

* which they'd have to be for Clinton to earn exclusive 100% blame
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top