Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
You guys can keep lobbing shit bombs at me all you like, you haven't provided any evidence for any theory on origin of life. Except for AssClown, who thinks a theory on Evolution (which Mott thinks is 'fact') explains something it doesn't even deal with.
You can claim I don't understand what Science is, but I know that Science does not prove things and scientific theory is not established fact. If you don't believe me, go look up the words in a dictionary and see for yourself. This is not dependent on whether you took more Science in college, or if you are a nuclear physicist, the truth doesn't changed based on educational background. Science doesn't disprove ID any more than it proves ET, and the two theories are not related in subject at all.
My 'argument' here has always been, for open-mindedness and exploring the possibilities. Your counter argument has been closed-minded refusal to accept possibilities based on personal faith. Which one of us is the 'Scientist' and which is the 'Zealot'?
Now, I could have easily said, we were created because God said we were, and if you doubt his word you are going to hell.... case closed! It must be true! Don't need to hear your Science, don't need to hear your theory bullshit. But you see, I haven't done that, I haven't even mentioned God or Religion, other than to point out that an Intelligence source for design doesn't necessarily mean a God. You, on the other hand, continue to argue that your "god", Science, is infallible and empirical, and somehow proves intelligent design is impossible. You have offered no evidence to support this belief, so I have to assume it is a belief based on faith alone.
You can claim I don't understand what Science is, but I know that Science does not prove things and scientific theory is not established fact. If you don't believe me, go look up the words in a dictionary and see for yourself. This is not dependent on whether you took more Science in college, or if you are a nuclear physicist, the truth doesn't changed based on educational background. Science doesn't disprove ID any more than it proves ET, and the two theories are not related in subject at all.
My 'argument' here has always been, for open-mindedness and exploring the possibilities. Your counter argument has been closed-minded refusal to accept possibilities based on personal faith. Which one of us is the 'Scientist' and which is the 'Zealot'?
Now, I could have easily said, we were created because God said we were, and if you doubt his word you are going to hell.... case closed! It must be true! Don't need to hear your Science, don't need to hear your theory bullshit. But you see, I haven't done that, I haven't even mentioned God or Religion, other than to point out that an Intelligence source for design doesn't necessarily mean a God. You, on the other hand, continue to argue that your "god", Science, is infallible and empirical, and somehow proves intelligent design is impossible. You have offered no evidence to support this belief, so I have to assume it is a belief based on faith alone.