Well, agree to disagree. I just posted an article on the actual exchange between the little shit and the student asking him about the shitheads mentor, Charlie Kirk. It's the little shit's fault he got booed off stage, not the University's.
Yeah, sure. A bunch of brainwashed little SJW pussies who cannot deal with another person's opinions, attend a speaking engagement then start shouting at him from all directions making it impossible for him to speak.
But it's his fault.
Your logic is as backasswards as the shit you call your brain.
I'm not sure why you allow your hatred to blind you so? I'm going to type very slowly, so that you can read what I'm actually saying:
I don't know how many times I have to explain that intelligent individuals know their audience.
What the fuck makes you think that civil rights speakers would ever attend a Klan rally?
It was a UNIVERSITY.
An institution of higher learning where people at one time, were receptive to hearing other views.
How was he supposed to know a bunch of snotty little assholes were going to buy up all the tickets then pack the audience with SJW crybabies who'd throw a mass tantrum while he was trying to speak?
Shittenhouse, like Nomad, doesn't consider that speech to be racist. They consider it to be truth.
And that's the crux of the problem.
I'm defending a principle here, not Rittenhouse or his views.
I realize that you can't wrap your head around that because you have no principles.
He goes right to the gay insults which tells you all you need to know about him. Angry little man. Nothing more, nothing less.
When you're going against a bunch of effeminate panty waists like you and the rest of this sissy-ass bunch, what do you expect a normal man to do?
Stop acting like girls and I'll stop pointing out how fucking gay you homos are.
I think Nomad's advocacy for the 2A has triggered <-- (no pun intended) him. Rittenhouse is a darling of 2A nuts. The fact the kid's sponsor is a racist propagandist piece of shit doesn't seem to matter to absolutists like Nomad.
I've always advocated stricter gun control laws, and rewriting or possibly even repealing 2A, you dishonest, lying little SJW dick sucker.
It's not just 2A. Nomad is pro cop to the death. He views anyone who spoke out against the Floyd murder as a 'thug'.
I'd rather be pro cop than pro ghetto thug cop killer like you.
Any day of the week.
And I will never believe Floyd was murdered.
That's your Kool Aid and you're welcome to drink it till you puke.
He believes that Rittenhouse was well within the scope of normal behavior when he purchased an assault weapon for the sole purpose of murdering someone that night. He would have preferred black people, but he couldn't find any.
Do I?
Is that what I believe?
Please find a quote of me expressing anything close to that.
OR.... admit that you're a liar.
I'll repeat what I said above.... I'm defending a principle here, not Rittenhouse or anything he's done or said.
The reason why you can't understand defending principles, is because you don't have any of your own.
You think having principles means defending black ghetto trash for no other reason than that they're black and you've been brainwashed into thinking that makes you principled and morally superior.
Newsflash: it doesn't.
It just makes you a lover and defender of trash.
But he was targeting (with the blessing of the local police) anyone who was protesting against the shooting of Jacob Blake.
Where did you hear that he had the blessing of the local police?
From some bullshit black propaganda website like those liars at The Grio or The Root?
I've never heard that, and given the lies you've been spouting in this thread, I have no reason to believe you now.
Post a source that confirms that.
Blake was arguably a fool, but there was no need to shoot him as many times as he was shot in the back.
The angry ape was resisting arrest and tried to go for a knife on the floor of the car. It got exactly what it asked for.
By default, Rittenhouse was a hero to Nomad.
And for a third time.... I'm defending the principle of free speech.
I've never given two shits about Rittenhouse.
And again.... the reason you don't understand defending the principle of allowing someone to exercise their right to free speech even when you disagree with what they're saying, is because you have no principles.
You are a lover and coddler of black ghetto thug cop killers.
And nothing more.
.