More criminal activity from the left...

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
HOUSTON, TX - Friday afternoon at an early polling place located at 6719 W. Montgomery Road in Houston, NAACP members were seen advocating for President Barack Obama according to volunteer poll watchers on location at the time.

According to Eve Rockford, a poll watcher trained by voter integrity group True the Vote, three NAACP members showed up to the 139 precinct location with 50 cases of bottled water and began handing bottles out to people standing in line. While wearing NAACP labeled clothing, members were "stirring the crowd" and talking to voters about flying to Ohio to promote President Barack Obama.

After watching what was occurring, Rockford approached Polling Supervisor Rose Cochran about what she was seeing.

"I went to the polling supervisor and let her know that it was not appropriate that they were in the building handing out water. She ignored me. I repeated my statement. She told me that she would handle it. She did nothing. I then went to the assistant supervisor and he stood up, walked over to another table and then sat down. I then walked into the waiting room and they were reloading another dolly with more cases of water," Rockford said in a True the Vote incident report.

After handing out water and advocating for President Obama, the NAACP members started handpicking and moving people to the front of a long voting line inside the polling place according to the incident report. After multiple complaints from voters about the line cutting, Rockford received a phone call from downtown telling her to “stand down.”

“All of the sudden one of the clerks, Dayan Cohen, said that someone wanted to speak to me on the phone. It was someone from downtown. I got on the phone and she said she was from downtown and that I needed to stand down and that it was okay for the NAACP to be within 100 ft. and they could hand out water. I told her that the NAACP was inside the building, wearing the NAACP clothing and caps and were handing out water and moving people from the back of the lines to the front of the lines,” Rockford said.

At this point, NAACP members were instructed to turn their clothing inside out, which they refused to do and said they weren’t going to stop their actions inside the polling place. Their behavior and actions to move people to the front of the line continued for the rest of the evening. Texas State Representative Sylvester Turner, a former Texas NAACP leader, was also seen outside the building talking with voters.

“The NAACP basically ran this poll location and the judges did nothing about it,” Rockford said.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...r_president_obama_at_houston_polling_location
 
According to rightwing shills and a rightwing blog?

Poor Blabo.
 
Bravo - you would have quite a bit more credibility on these threads if you would post some of the issues on the other side of the coin. Clearly, for any student of history, both sides have their stories of corruption & malfeasance.
 
Bravo - you would have quite a bit more credibility on these threads if you would post some of the issues on the other side of the coin. Clearly, for any student of history, both sides have their stories of corruption & malfeasance.

Well, when we have a thread on the old days, history, we call all reminisce....these are things that are happening NOW.......in this election.....
just to show you the double standard is alive and well......
 
as i predicted, you have no problem with this

where is the attack zappa?

When someone provides something a little more substantial than third party, unfounded hearsay, then I will comment.

You attacked when you ignored the OP to instead make it about me.
 
Last edited:
When someone provides something a little more substantial than third party, unfounded hearsay, then I will comment.

You attacked when you ignored the OP to instead make it about me.

again...where is the attack? are you incapable of answering a simple question?

if this had been about a conservative, you would have jumped all over it. that is not an attack, but the simple and unfortunate truth.
 
You attacked when you ignored the OP to instead make it about me.

again...where is the attack? are you incapable of answering a simple question?

Right there...as usual, you ignored me yet again.

You attacked when you ignored the OP to instead make it about me.

See that? That's me answering your question.

if this had been about a conservative, you would have jumped all over it. that is not an attack, but the simple and unfortunate truth.

If if if...

If wishes were horses you could go for a ride...

Unfortunately for you it WASN'T about a conservative and I didn't jump on anything...you DID however ignore the OP to make it about me.
 
it was not snide. it was a factual comment which you have proven correct.

sorry if the truth hurts zappa. but it is not an attack.

What was "factual"?

The OP without one single source of evidence to back up that lady's claims?

IF it is proven factual then we can talk...

Until then I am still waiting on some kind of ACTUAL PROOF that this occurred.

Of course that's why they post this anecdotal hearsay BS on Fridays...so it can circulate around the interwebs over the weekend and get picked up and reported on as "fact" by Faux News on Monday.
 
apparently liberals see nothing to be concerned about here......

I see that despite the OP being posted last Friday, not one single person has come forward with any sort of conclusive proof to corroborate what some third party reported as "fact", even happened in the first place.
 
Back
Top