More examples liberal racism?

New Black Panthers Threaten to Kill Crackers – Promise SHOWDOWN at RNC

nbp-e1340650875517.jpg


nbp-2-e1340651372276.jpg


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...-these-crackers-these-pigs-these-pink-people/

A. Who told you that the NBP are liberals?????????????????????

They aren't.

B. The suggestion that liberals are racist is so mindboggling mindless that it is laughable,

Conservatives belong to an all-white party where diversity is a bad word.

C. Where oh where are your posts about all the mindless and racist shit that comes from the right?

You are looking for an honest debate, aren't you?
 
WTF?

The 'original' quote?

How does anyone here know you didn't FIRST change it to say what you were claiming??

I guess we'll have to weigh this against your track record....oh, wait....


GOOD QUESTION!!

We KNOW FOR A FACT that Yurt lies...he's been busted too many times for him to claim otherwise.

One must conclude that we CANNOT accept Yurt's wikipedia corroboration as "factual".

If only he hadn't told so many bald faced lies in the past...oh well.
 
still waiting for that site i'm banned at and can't read

come on gatorman....you're tell the truth right....?


So you won't provide me with a straight, simple answer with the post number where you claim I made the "all posts" comment even though I've asked a dozen times, but you expect Gatorman provide you with just that information...yet ANOTHER example of Yurt's double standard...

OMG Yurt is so funny!

And so full of shit!
 
Okay, so the argument is that because there are few of them people who suggest they want to kill people due to their skin pigmentation should be ignored if they happen to be part of this particular group?

Nonsense, utter and total garbage. If we used that measure then McVeigh was totally not dangerous and should have been ignored.
 
Okay, so the argument is that because there are few of them people who suggest they want to kill people due to their skin pigmentation should be ignored if they happen to be part of this particular group?

Nonsense, utter and total garbage. If we used that measure then McVeigh was totally not dangerous and should have been ignored.

McVeigh WAS ignored.

No one suggests a that any threatening group should be ignored.

What should be ignored is trying to make them into a political football.
 
McVeigh WAS ignored.

No one suggests a that any threatening group should be ignored.

What should be ignored is trying to make them into a political football.

Do you understand the word "should"? Please... Tell me all about how he should have been ignored because there are even less people in his group than in the NBPP...
 
Do you understand the word "should"? Please... Tell me all about how he should have been ignored because there are even less people in his group than in the NBPP...

Do you understand the word "WAS?"

McVeigh WAS ignored until it was too late.

Who cares about how many people was in his group .. and I'm betting that you don't know how many there were/are in either group.

More importantly, what is your point? I've already said that NO threatening group SHOULD be ignored .. including the NBP.

What else are you looking for?
 
Do you understand the word "WAS?"

McVeigh WAS ignored until it was too late.

Who cares about how many people was in his group .. and I'm betting that you don't know how many there were/are in either group.

More importantly, what is your point? I've already said that NO threatening group SHOULD be ignored .. including the NBP.

What else are you looking for?

Again, that only underlines that THESE PEOPLE shouldn't be ignored.

The original post was about "should".

Do you in fact know what the word means?

My point here was that being dismissive of the danger because of numbers has been shown in the past to be foolish. As for "should" not be ignored, you should talk to Eric Holder who hides behind Executive Privilege so that he won't have to face justice for the death of brown people.
 
Again, that only underlines that THESE PEOPLE shouldn't be ignored.

The original post was about "should".

Do you in fact know what the word means?

My point here was that being dismissive of the danger because of numbers has been shown in the past to be foolish.

IS THERE A POINT TO THIS?

Post where I said ANY threatening group should be ignored.
Is that too difficult?

Post where I said we should be dismissive of any danger.
 
IS THERE A POINT TO THIS?

Post where I said ANY threatening group should be ignored.
Is that too difficult?

Post where I said we should be dismissive of any danger.


You'll have to excuse Damo...he's obviously visiting the board in his "Harry Hyperbole" persona this morning.

Honest debate isn't something he's interested in right now.
 
IS THERE A POINT TO THIS?

Post where I said ANY threatening group should be ignored.
Is that too difficult?

Post where I said we should be dismissive of any danger.

Go back to my original post and show me where I made any point about you personally. I didn't quote you, I simply read some of the posts in this thread where some people were dismissive of the danger of the NBPP because of their reported numbers and made a comparative observation. What made you believe it was about you personally? The answer to that question may be more telling about you than you believe. Why do you feel the need to get defensive when somebody hasn't even spoken to you directly?
 
Go back to my original post and show me where I made any point about you personally. I didn't quote you, I simply read some of the posts in this thread where some people were dismissive of the danger of the NBPP because of their reported numbers and made a comparative observation. What made you believe it was about you personally? The answer to that question may be more telling about you than you believe. Why do you feel the need to get defensive when somebody hasn't even spoken to you directly?

I can't answer for everybody here. I can only account for my own words and beliefs.

Your questions about what someone else thinks should be directed to that person, not me.

What I do see is your partisan approach to this conversation. You've yet to respond to my question about "death panels."

I responded to your biased comments.
 
Last edited:
OMFG! A couple hundred Black Militants, quick hide the white women and children....!

The Southern Poverty Law Center monitors hate groups and other extremists throughout the United States and exposes their activities to law enforcement agencies, the media and the public. We publish our investigative findings online, on our Hatewatch blog, and in the Intelligence Report, our award-winning quarterly journal. We’ve crippled some of the country’s most notorious hate groups by suing them for murders and other violent acts committed by their members.

Currently, there are 1,018 known hate groups operating across the country, including neo-Nazis, Klansmen, white nationalists, neo-Confederates, racist skinheads, black separatists, border vigilantes and others.

And their numbers are growing.

Since 2000, the number of hate groups has increased by 69 percent. This surge has been fueled by anger and fear over the nation’s ailing economy, an influx of non-white immigrants, and the diminishing white majority, as symbolized by the election of the nation’s first African-American president.

These factors also are feeding a powerful resurgence of the antigovernment “Patriot” movement, which in the 1990s led to a string of domestic terrorist plots, including the Oklahoma City bombing. The number of Patriot groups, including armed militias, grew by 755 percent in the first three years of the Obama administration – from 149 at the end of 2008 to 1,274 in 2011.

This growth in extremism has been aided by mainstream media figures and politicians who have used their platforms to legitimize false propaganda about immigrants and other minorities and spread the kind of paranoid conspiracy theories on which militia groups thrive.

Hmmm... a couple hundred (maybe) black militants vs hundreds of groups of white militants fed by right-wing fascist politicians and their propaganda machine.
 
A. Who told you that the NBP are liberals?????????????????????

They aren't.

B. The suggestion that liberals are racist is so mindboggling mindless that it is laughable,

Conservatives belong to an all-white party where diversity is a bad word.

C. Where oh where are your posts about all the mindless and racist shit that comes from the right?

You are looking for an honest debate, aren't you?

lol....they are not liberals. that is freakin funny. your claim that liberals cannot be racist is even funnier and shows you're delusional. the claim that conservatives belong to an all white party is also delusional.

you're a kook.
 
WTF?

The 'original' quote?

How does anyone here know you didn't FIRST change it to say what you were claiming??

I guess we'll have to weigh this against your track record....oh, wait....

ask howey if he changed the quote. let's see how honest he is.
 
Yes, I've noticed. He's not as clever as he thinks he is, though. The jig's been up with wiki for a long time. What he did (editing the quote before he posted it) is the oldest trick in the book.

i did not edit the quote liar. what is funny about your claim is that you just admitted howey changed the quote, because if i edited before i posted it, then howey had to change it because he used the link after me.

TFF - you just admitted howey is a liar.
 
lol....they are not liberals. that is freakin funny. your claim that liberals cannot be racist is even funnier and shows you're delusional. the claim that conservatives belong to an all white party is also delusional.

you're a kook.

Look around the room filled with you and your right-wing pals. :rofl2:

Look at the makeup of the republican Congress :rofl2:

You're an idiot trying to deny the obvious.

:rofl2:
 
Look around the room filled with you and your right-wing pals. :rofl2:

Look at the makeup of the republican Congress :rofl2:

You're an idiot trying to deny the obvious.

:rofl2:

so you're backing off your claims? i don't get your weird post. you claim that liberals cannot be racist - false. you claim that conservatives belong to an all white party - false. you claim the NBPP are not liberal...now that is funny. using your delusional logic, how can they be conservative if conservatives are all white? LOL.

you're losing it aren't you?
 
Back
Top