DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
It's become more than a distraction. It harms the board. Makes it easy to spread rep though...You create a billion trolls and maybe two of them are either funny or interesting reading...
It's become more than a distraction. It harms the board. Makes it easy to spread rep though...You create a billion trolls and maybe two of them are either funny or interesting reading...
Not really, considering they have neg rep and therefore no rep power.It's become more than a distraction. It harms the board. Makes it easy to spread rep though...
That is a plus. Plus it does increase your overall traffic. Business-wise, it makes sense to have these useful idiots.Not really, considering they have neg rep and therefore no rep power.
Oh, I see what you mean. You give them neg rep so you can "spread it around"...That is a plus. Plus it does increase your overall traffic. Business-wise, it makes sense to have these useful idiots.
Oh, I see what you mean. You give them neg rep so you can "spread it around"...
Cool!
Its freekin' ....no "g"......google is your friend, try it....or maybe the urban dictionary, that might have it....
Cripes, pretty soon you'll be ridiculing President Obama for saying "corpse" men in a speech, instead of "corps"men.....3 times no less....
or would you stoop that low ?......Clarabelle.....
Put your skirt down.....no one is buying.
You spelled a word WRONG, and continue to do it in an effort to enforce your point. The "urban dictionary" is not Websters or Oxford...it's not the standard in decent grade or high schools or colleges and last time I checked, street slang didn't go over well in a job interview.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Then, if you're so inclined, we can have a rational discussion on the facts.
????....but where would I find someone to have it with?......
For a liberal, you're being very conservative about spelling.
Establishment Dictionary = Conservative
Urban Dictionary = Liberal
Thanks.
Put your skirt down.....no one is buying.
You spelled a word WRONG, and continue to do it in an effort to enforce your point. The "urban dictionary" is not Websters or Oxford...it's not the standard in decent grade or high schools or colleges and last time I checked, street slang didn't go over well in a job interview.
So for you to invoke the latest neocon orgasm over Obama's ERROR as a comparsion to my pointing out your proud defense of your poor composition is an action of a an insipidly stubborn child. But hey, if "clarabelle" is still a knee slapper at the "home", then I guess anything is possible with you. Carry on.
Cripes, pretty soon you'll be ridiculing President Obama for saying "corpse" men in a speech, instead of "corps"men.....3 times no less....
or would you stoop that low ?......Clarabelle...
you know, I tried.....I really tried....until I came to the important one....
and what did I find when I clicked the sublink provided?....
http://home.ourfuture.org/media/record-breaking-senate-conservatives.html
I find that comprehensive.....as well as consistent with your argument....."not found"........
Cloture Motions - 107th Congress
From January 3, 2001 through November 22, 2002, 72 cloture motions were filed.
http://senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/cloture_motions/107.shtml
Sometimes I truly believe that you are sincerely that dense! But hope springs eternal. Note the chart used in this article and the source of that chart:
http://www.ourfuture.org/obstruction
All you had to say was, "the link didn't work"....
As you're not really interested (or too lazy) in basic research of the issue, just this once, I'll do your homework for you. I've provided a article from the source plus a clearer chart from another source. Note the source of the chart used on both:
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2009114505/republican-party-party-no
http://www.ourfuture.org/obstruction
yep I see the chart of cloture votes brought by the party of obstruction.....however, as bravo has pointed out, that party is the party of Harry Reid, the guy who filed the clotures......you keep ignoring that part.....much to our amusement....
Whats your point fool.....why use some boneheaded left wing bullshit site when you can go directly to the US SENATE and get the official figures...thats why you're an idiot, you read left wing crap and its clogging what little brain you might have....
Cloture Motions - 110th Congress
From January 4, 2007 through January 2, 2009, 139 cloture motions were filed.
Note WHO FILED these motions....
http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/ref...otions/110.htm
Originally Posted by bravo View Post
Cloture Motions - 107th Congress
From January 3, 2001 through November 22, 2002, 72 cloture motions were filed.
http://senate.gov/pagelayout/referen...ions/107.shtml
So tell me Miss Clara, now that your a year or two out of the ebonics stage, how is it pronounced....kor-men or korpse-men.....
Your Harvard, affirmative action educated Messiah thinks its Corpse-men...
Is that freekin' right.....Oh, did you google 'freekin' yet.....174,000 hits on freekin'....
Originally Posted by bravo
So tell me Miss Clara, now that your a year or two out of the ebonics stage, how is it pronounced....kor-men or korpse-men.....
Your Harvard, affirmative action educated Messiah thinks its Corpse-men...
Is that freekin' right.....Oh, did you google 'freekin' yet.....174,000 hits on freekin'....
How would you use "freekin" or "freeking" in a job interview??
Would it be something like:
"I really want to work for your freeking company; because I need a freekin J-O-B."
So tell me Miss Clara, now that your a year or two out of the ebonics stage, how is it pronounced....kor-men or korpse-men.....
Your Harvard, affirmative action educated Messiah thinks its Corpse-men...
Is that freekin' right.....Oh, did you google 'freekin' yet.....174,000 hits on freekin'....
It's called "democracy". No wonder you Democrats hate it.