More proof what morons these global warming hoaxers are

FALSE! He provided nothing more than opinions!

Sorry! But opinions are not proof!

I think we just defined the PROBLEM of TRUMPTARDATION.

You Goon SQUAD TRUMPTARDS DO NOT EVEN KNOW how to differentiate BETWEEN SCIENTIFIC FACT AND OPINION.

Which is no surprise, as you TRUMPTARDS ALSO REJECT HISTORICAL FACTS, FACTS ESTABLISHED IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, OR EVEN FACTS REGARDING THE CONSTITUTION AND IT'S FRAMERS.

WHY? I'll tell you why? THE FACTS DO NOT PLAY INTO YOUR POLITICAL NARRATIVES AND THE EASIEST THING ANYONE CAN DO IS JUST DENY EVERYTHING- TAKEN RIGHT FROM DONALD TRUMP'S POLITICAL PLAY BOOK- DENY! DENY! DENY!- LIE! LIE! LIE!- CRY! CRY! CRY!

NEXT!

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacies. Redefinition fallacies (fact<->Universal Truth, science<->fact, history<->fact, proof<->fact). Inversion fallacy. It is Democrats that deny, deny, deny.
 
Here's what I don't get.
You don't get much of anything except what Democrats tell you to believe.
If you're so sure this evidence will prove me wrong and show with great certainty that the 2020 election was fraudulent, why don't you show it to me?
Already did. RQAA.
You could win this argument. You could call yourself the winner and make me take the walk of shame.
Yet you continue to hesitate in 'releasing the Kraken', saying "I already did".
And because of your propensity for deceit, I can only assume that you're lying and have no evidence.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Case closed.
Lie. Cliche fallacy.
 
Lack of Evidence fallacy. Evidence Delusion Fallacy. Irrational, Psychotic beliefs fallacy. Tendency towards gullibility Fallacy. Lack of Evidence fallacy.

I can't make the evidence disappear if there is none. Could that be why you won't show me the evidence? Pussy Fallacy.

You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats disappear by mockery or by wishing, dude. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.
 
Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacies. Redefinition fallacies (fact<->Universal Truth, science<->fact, history<->fact, proof<->fact). Inversion fallacy. It is Democrats that deny, deny, deny.

BUZZ OFF!

People like You Sir- is the reason why God created the Middle Finger!
 
It's not his fault that imbeciles like you are totally incapable of understanding graphs and empirical evidence. Yet you munched on Michael Mann's man meat with gay abandon, shit for brains!

Imbeciles like you take at face value a cherrypicked graph because you like what it shows. What this one shows is a distorted picture. Here is a fuller picture from the conservative Forbes citing findings that show ocean temperatures and sea levels are at the highest we have seen.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/veroni...test-climate-report-confirms/?sh=6342aa635db5
 
yZJ6dBT.jpg

You really are incredibly stupid, I doubt you could even tell me the origin of the 97% bullshit.
 
Imbeciles like you take at face value a cherrypicked graph because you like what it shows. What this one shows is a distorted picture. Here is a fuller picture from the conservative Forbes citing findings that show ocean temperatures and sea levels are at the highest we have seen.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/veroni...test-climate-report-confirms/?sh=6342aa635db5

LIAR

Forbes has a Center AllSides Media Bias Rating™.

Note: This rating is for online content on Forbes.com only. AllSides does not rate the bias of print content.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/forbes
 
You really are incredibly stupid, I doubt you could even tell me the origin of the 97% bullshit.

Here are over 1100 scientists including heavyweights like MIT professor Richard Lindzen and Nobel Prize physics winner Ivar Giaever who say you're a bullshitter.

Over 1100 Scientists and Professionals Sign Formal Declaration: “There is No Climate Emergency”

“There is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

Legal Insurrection readers may recall that relatively early on in the covid pandemic cycle, leading infectious disease experts created the Great Barrington Declaration.

The formal declaration stressed that lockdowns were destructive and “focused protection” of vulnerable individuals was the way to properly address the highly infectious, novel virus. Over 4000 scientists, including a good number of epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists, signed the document.

It turns out these scientists were correct.

The effects of lockdown may now be killing more people than are dying of Covid, official statistics suggest.

Figures for excess deaths from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that around 1,000 more people than usual are currently dying each week from conditions other than the virus.

The Telegraph understands that the Department of Health has ordered an investigation into the figures amid concern that the deaths are linked to delays to and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

Perhaps it is time to consider if the World Climate Declaration, which has been signed by over 1,100 climate scientists and related professionals, may be something to seriously consider, promote, and act on. In the document, these scientists affirm that there is “no climate emergency.”

The political fiction that humans cause most or all climate change and the claim that the science behind this notion is ‘settled’, has been dealt a savage blow by the publication of a ‘World Climate Declaration (WCD)’ signed by over 1,100 scientists and professionals. There is no climate emergency, say the authors, who are drawn from across the world and led by the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever. Climate science is said to have degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science.

The scale of the opposition to modern day ‘settled’ climate science is remarkable, given how difficult it is in academia to raise grants for any climate research that departs from the political orthodoxy. (A full list of the signatories is available here.) Another lead author of the declaration, Professor Richard Lindzen, has called the current climate narrative “absurd”, but acknowledged that trillions of dollars and the relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists currently says it is not absurd.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/...al-declaration-there-is-no-climate-emergency/ no
 
Last edited:
maggot;
Here are 1000 scientists including heavyweights like MIT professor Richard Lindzen and Nobel Prize physics winner Ivar Giaever who say you're a bullshitter.

Check the sources of their income. Then arrest them. They are a danger to humanity- let alone all the other life on earth.
 
Poor Tom. Still spreading his long-debunked nonsense after all these years. It must feel sad to know that the world has left you behind in the climate-change dust.
 
Here are over 1100 scientists including heavyweights like MIT professor Richard Lindzen and Nobel Prize physics winner Ivar Giaever who say you're a bullshitter.

Over 1100 Scientists and Professionals Sign Formal Declaration: “There is No Climate Emergency”

“There is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

Legal Insurrection readers may recall that relatively early on in the covid pandemic cycle, leading infectious disease experts created the Great Barrington Declaration.

The formal declaration stressed that lockdowns were destructive and “focused protection” of vulnerable individuals was the way to properly address the highly infectious, novel virus. Over 4000 scientists, including a good number of epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists, signed the document.

It turns out these scientists were correct.

The effects of lockdown may now be killing more people than are dying of Covid, official statistics suggest.

Figures for excess deaths from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that around 1,000 more people than usual are currently dying each week from conditions other than the virus.

The Telegraph understands that the Department of Health has ordered an investigation into the figures amid concern that the deaths are linked to delays to and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer, diabetes and heart disease.

Perhaps it is time to consider if the World Climate Declaration, which has been signed by over 1,100 climate scientists and related professionals, may be something to seriously consider, promote, and act on. In the document, these scientists affirm that there is “no climate emergency.”

The political fiction that humans cause most or all climate change and the claim that the science behind this notion is ‘settled’, has been dealt a savage blow by the publication of a ‘World Climate Declaration (WCD)’ signed by over 1,100 scientists and professionals. There is no climate emergency, say the authors, who are drawn from across the world and led by the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever. Climate science is said to have degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science.

The scale of the opposition to modern day ‘settled’ climate science is remarkable, given how difficult it is in academia to raise grants for any climate research that departs from the political orthodoxy. (A full list of the signatories is available here.) Another lead author of the declaration, Professor Richard Lindzen, has called the current climate narrative “absurd”, but acknowledged that trillions of dollars and the relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists currently says it is not absurd.

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/...al-declaration-there-is-no-climate-emergency/ no

Might be a relevant post if the quoted study related to a different topic, i.e., one about "climate emergency", not rising ocean temperatures and sea levels and their long term dangers, the topic of this thread. Try again if you find
something in that cherry picked bag you depend on.
 
Back
Top