More sexual perversion!

Trump's Brain said:
You guys almost happily elected a pedophile to the US Senate in Alabama. Don't go pointing your fingers at Democrats you soulless perverts!
Click to expand...

And a president who breaks his wedding vows, grabs women by the pussies and brags about it, and had sex with young girls arranged by Ghislaine for Trump and Epstein. The same Trump who is in court for rape and lies right now.
 
cuties.gif
​


Rolling Stone, the L.A. Times, and The New Yorker think 11 year-old crotch shots are “worth seeing”, a nice “coming-of-age” story, and condemned critics as "crazies from the right-wing" who are “afraid of child sexuality.”


https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-reviews/cuties-movie-review-1056197/

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2020-09-08/cuties-review-maimouna-doucoure-netflix

https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-front-row/cuties-mignonnes-the-extraordinary-netflix-debut-that-became-the-target-of-a-right-wing-campaign
 
Nordberg said:
And a president who breaks his wedding vows, grabs women by the pussies and brags about it, and had sex with young girls arranged by Ghislaine for Trump and Epstein. The same Trump who is in court for rape and lies right now.
Click to expand...

??? He's in court? I have no heard that.
 
Lame Brain said:
??? He's in court? I have no heard that.
Click to expand...

That's because it isn't true - not that it would stop you from believing it. The president is not in court. A women who claims he raped her decades ago is suing him for defamation in a civil suit because he denied the accusation and said she wasn't his type.
 
Nordberg said:
And a president who breaks his wedding vows, grabs women by the pussies and brags about it, and had sex with young girls arranged by Ghislaine for Trump and Epstein. The same Trump who is in court for rape and lies right now.
Click to expand...

Link to the court
 
volsrock said:
Link to the court
Click to expand...

It's true that the president is the defendant in a civil suit. Several, in fact.

But he's not "in court", and he's certainly not "in court for rape and lies" that I'm aware of. Rape is a felony, not a civil matter.
 
Nerdberg said:
It stems from his rape charges in the E.Jean carrol case. Barr has asked to have this case put under the Justice dept, lawyers. Every other president had to pay for lawyers to defend them. Trump lives by his own rules.
Click to expand...

Rape charges are felonies, Nerdberg. A man charged with rape is arrested if there is probable cause to believe the allegation.

Carroll claims in a civil suit that the president defamed her when he denied her unproven allegation. The president has not appeared in court, nor is he likely to, IMO.

Ms. Carroll is suing the president because the bar for evidence is much lower in civil court, and I suspect she's hoping to get a book/movie deal out of it.
 
Wolverine said:
The slippery slope to normalizing pedophilia is getting quite slick!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/20/netflix-pandering-pedophiles-everywhere/

Netflix, in a new series called “Cuties,” is blatantly sexualizing little girls. And tens of thousands have already signed a petition demanding the show’s removal from public streaming.

But how could such a horrifying show make it past the pitch room in the first place?

Netflix, the media company that panders to the pedophile crowd. What a brand concept.

TOP STORIES
'Riding the Dragon': Documentary probes Hunter Biden's dealing in China
Nevada city threatens company for hosting Trump rally
Will Antifa and Black Lives Matter cancel the Biden-Harris ticket?

“Netflix is premiering *Cuties* on September 9,” tweeted one member of the Catholic cloth, as Mediaite reported. “Here’s the plot summary — the promotional image is 11 year olds dressed in clothes inappropriate for adults (so bad I won’t tweet it). I can’t believe we need to say pedophilia is wrong … But so many went to Epstein’s Island.”

Even the program description from Netflix sounds bad.

It first read, “Amy, 11, becomes fascinated with a twerking dance crew. Hoping to join them, she starts to explore her femininity, defying her family’s traditions.”

After mass outrage, Netflix issued an apology and watered down the descriptive text.

The new Netflix billing reads: “Eleven-year-old Amy starts to rebel against her conservative family’s traditions when she becomes fascinated with a free-spirited dance crew,” Netflix writes of its series.

But if pictures say a thousand words, just watch the trailer.

The phrase “free-spirited” is somewhat of a misnomer. All that’s missing is the pole. Let’s remember: 11-year-olds are generally sixth graders. They color with crayons, they jump rope for fun, they giggle at members of the opposite sex. They watch cartoons on Saturday mornings.

Except on Netflix, where they serve as booty-shaking sex dolls for the pervert class. Apparently.

More than 41,000 have signed the Change.org petition to remove the show from Netflix. Good.
Click to expand...



alg091520dAPR20200913114508.jpg
 
Nordberg said:
It stems from his rape charges in the E.Jean carrol case. Barr has asked to have this case put under the Justice dept, lawyers. Every other president had to pay for lawyers to defend them. Trump lives by his own rules.
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree with your last sentence. Barr's only allegiance is to trump, which is another one of trump's rules: if he appoints you you'd better show loyalty to him and fuck The Constitution.
 
Trump's Brain said:
Yes, I agree with your last sentence. Barr's only allegiance is to trump, which is another one of trump's rules: if he appoints you you'd better show loyalty to him and fuck The Constitution.
Click to expand...

Does Nancy run the house any Differently? She will take your funding, and run someone against you if you diss her! So quit trying to take some kind of moral high ground!
 
Legion said:
If the uproar over Netflix’s Cuties tells us anything, it’s that we’re now at a point where the political left and the national media want to normalize child pornography.

There is no moral world, no sane world in which a movie like Cuties is okay. I do not agree the movie is a critique of how social media sexualizes children.

To me, Cuties is a classic story with a classic structure. You put your hero through a difficult journey and the hero comes out the other end better for it. That’s what twerking and posting nude photos accomplish for the 11-year-old Ami, the protagonist in Cuties. This journey is portrayed as difficult but ultimately healthy. Spiritually and mentally healthy. There’s no lasting damage at the end of that journey, just growth and enlightenment. Terrible message. Indefensible.

Even if you buy the manure that Cuties is critical of sexualizing children, how is sexualizing children to criticize sexualizing children okay?

Cuties is not like a movie opposed to torture or animal abuse or rape that dramatizes torture and animal abuse and rape. The sexualization of young girls is not dramatized in Cuties. The girls are sexualized. The camera floats all over them like a pervert, even when they spread their 11-year-old legs.

So why is the left suddenly crossing this line? Why is Netflix mainstreaming soft-core child pornography? Why is it now acceptable for the elite media to publish headlines like this one?: “Cuties, Netflix Review: a Provocative Powder-Keg for an Age Terrified of Child Sexuality” — as if only backwards hicks could be “terrified” of sexualizing 11-year-olds.

Or this headline: “The Creepy Conservative Obsession With Netflix’s Cuties, Explained” — as though finding soft-core child pornography revolting and outrageous is all of a sudden a “creepy obsession.”

Those in the media not openly defending soft-core child pornography are defending it by covering up the controversy, by pretending it doesn’t exist, like CNNLOL.

Talk about silence as complicity.

So how did we get to a point where Hollywood, the national media, and the political left are openly embracing and defending crotch shots and booty shots of 11-year-old characters wearing too much makeup, tank tops, and short-shorts?

Well, I think there are a few elements at work here.

The first is that the political left hates the right so fucking much that when given the choice between defending child pornography and siding with us, they’re going to defend child pornography. Good grief, they are already defending, championing, and encouraging four months of riots, looting, arson, murder, and mayhem. These are depraved people.

The second thing is that there are too many people in the elite media and Hollywood who want to have sex with children. Sorry, they just do. You think this is only a problem in the Catholic Church? So…

If you want to have sex with kids, if you want that lifestyle normalized, how do you accomplish that?

Well, you start by slowly normalizing it with movies like Cuties. You nudge the line just a bit so people get people used to it.

Think about it: Hollywood, the media, and the left — through entertainment and sex education and the like — have been sexualizing children for a few decades now.

The third reason is, I think, the most important… By degrading and debasing children, you destroy the family structure, and nothing is a bigger threat to the left’s insatiable thirst for power than the nuclear family.

So they pump shit like Cuties into tens of millions of homes, disguise it as art, and attack those of us disgusted by it as “creepy” and “terrified” and unsophisticated and uncool.

Better still, it’s another battle in the culture war that keeps us divided, a battle that sends a message to young girls that the path to enlightenment and growth is stripping naked, spreading your legs wide, snapping a close-up, and publishing the results online.

Once that happens, lives are permanently destroyed, families are shattered, and sickos are one step closer to having their sex-with-kids lifestyle normalized.


https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/09/14/why-left-normalizing-child-pornography/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+%28Breitbart+News%29
Click to expand...

You come across as someone that's been in a cell more than once.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top