Mother, 39, who gave birth on NY sidewalk reveals 'lady tole her cab to hospital

Dantès said:
Oh look, it's a partial meeting of the JPP misogynist's and racist's klan members! Can I assume from this grouping that all men on JPP are misogynists, and a "nasty breed" because these two ignorant bastards obviously are? Because, even if this bullshit story was even partially true, it wouldn't apply to all women in NYC and certainly not all women on the #7 train and certainly not all women in any location. I've ridden the subway numerous times as well as the LIRR and I have yet to have any women on either system "stare holes" into me or any other men who wouldn't give them their seats. Many women when I have offered them my seat say that's OK and remain standing. But of course, I offer my seat whenever I see women standing so I guess I have better manners than some schmuck who gets "holes" stared into him for never doing so! Sorry, your mother never taught you any manners. Sorry you think your mother is a cow, that makes you a farm animal. Maybe you did get something right here after all!
Click to expand...

You are essentially a dingleberry hanging off of one of Rune's asshole hairs.

Just as no one said ALL women on ALL subway trains... nobody said NO slaves were ever beaten at ANY time...

Your only debate tactic seems to be to turn a statement into an absolute, when nobody presented it as such, and argue against the absolute that nobody presented.

Weak. So weak that Justin Beiber can beat it up and take its lunch money.
 
Abraxas said:
Pompous prick!!
Click to expand...

Why thank you, tommy, you're so cute when you start melting down and so predictable! The next post will no doubt contain your favorite the "C" word. Get ready folks it's coming!

He's so predictable!

(Any reference to an early Yardbirds tune is purely coincidental)
 
Dantès said:
Oh look, it's a partial meeting of the JPP misogynist's and racist's klan members! Can I assume from this grouping that all men on JPP are misogynists, and a "nasty breed" because these two ignorant bastards obviously are? Because, even if this bullshit story was even partially true, it wouldn't apply to all women in NYC and certainly not all women on the #7 train and certainly not all women in any location. I've ridden the subway numerous times as well as the LIRR and I have yet to have any women on either system "stare holes" into me or any other men who wouldn't give them their seats. Many women when I have offered them my seat say that's OK and remain standing. But of course, I offer my seat whenever I see women standing so I guess I have better manners than some schmuck who gets "holes" stared into him for never doing so! Sorry, your mother never taught you any manners. Sorry you think your mother is a cow, that makes you a farm animal. Maybe you did get something right here after all!
Click to expand...

Hey (edited), don't you know that the Aleutian Islands are part of Alaska, what a prat!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But let's continue the game.... so you're saying that EVERY woman on EVERY train will give up their seats to ANY pregnant woman they see?

Dingleberry: "No. I'm not saying that."

.... so then how is anything you're saying differing with what I said?
 
Taft2016 said:
You are essentially a dingleberry hanging off of one of Rune's asshole hairs.

Just as no one said ALL women on ALL subway trains... nobody said NO slaves were ever beaten at ANY time...

Your only debate tactic seems to be to turn a statement into an absolute, when nobody presented it as such, and argue against the absolute that nobody presented.

Weak. So weak that Justin Beiber can beat it up and take its lunch money.
Click to expand...

You latched on to his favourite trick pretty quick, that is exactly how he works. He is just a pompous windbag.
 
Taft2016 said:
But let's continue the game.... so you're saying that EVERY woman on EVERY train will give up their seats to ANY pregnant woman they see?

Dingleberry: "No. I'm not saying that."

.... so then how is anything you're saying differing with what I said?
Click to expand...

"NYC women are vicious, selfish, cows."

No qualifiers there. You said it. Own it you little coward.
 
Taft2016 said:
You are essentially a dingleberry hanging off of one of Rune's asshole hairs.

Just as no one said ALL women on ALL subway trains... nobody said NO slaves were ever beaten at ANY time...

Your only debate tactic seems to be to turn a statement into an absolute, when nobody presented it as such, and argue against the absolute that nobody presented.

Weak. So weak that Justin Beiber can beat it up and take its lunch money.
Click to expand...

OOh, you didn't like having your sexism pointed out did you? You thought you could hide amongst the rest of the bigots and not be noticed!
 
Darla said:
"NYC women are vicious, selfish, cows."

No qualifiers there. You said it. Own it you little coward.
Click to expand...

Only if one reads like a batshyte crazy dingleberry.

If I had said "Mexican boxers are known for throwing a good left hook to the body"...

... and you replied "Juan Manuel Marquez's left hook to the body is weak! I win! You don't know what you're talking about!"

That's essentially the course debates with you progress along. Stupid.
 
Taft2016 said:
You are essentially a dingleberry hanging off of one of Rune's asshole hairs.

Just as no one said ALL women on ALL subway trains... nobody said NO slaves were ever beaten at ANY time...

Your only debate tactic seems to be to turn a statement into an absolute, when nobody presented it as such, and argue against the absolute that nobody presented.

Weak. So weak that Justin Beiber can beat it up and take its lunch money.
Click to expand...


Sorry ignoramus, let me give you a very simple language lesson! First let me put the original comment here for all to see!

Taft2016 said:
NYC women are vicious, selfish, cows.

I was riding the 7 train... standing. Every seat at my end of the car was taken up by a woman.

At the next stop, a VERY pregnant woman got on. Now this boxcar full of cows, who love to stare holes into men who sit down while they are standing, all directed their eyes at the floor and pretended they didn't see their expecting "sister." And that included the cow who I had given my seat to.

It was really pretty disgusting.
Click to expand...


The first statement is this:

"NYC women are vicious, selfish, cows."

This statement as written without any limiting adjectives such as "some," "many," "most," "numerous," "few," and so on implies that you think that all "NYC women are vicious, selfish, cows." You can twist and turn and go nuts but you wrote it and that is what the sentence as written by you means. Sorry, I don't give a shit whether you think it means something else or not. That is what it means, just because you didn't write all doesn't imply that it doesn't mean all! It does, loser. So take your Justin Beiber comparisons and stick them up your childish racist, misogynist and ignorant ass!
 
Taft2016 said:
Only if one reads like a batshyte crazy dingleberry.

If I had said "Mexican boxers are known for throwing a good left hook to the body"...

... and you replied "Juan Manuel Marquez's left hook to the body is weak! I win! You don't know what you're talking about!"

That's essentially the course debates with you progress along. Stupid.
Click to expand...

We only have one on here to judge by but she is definitely vicious, selfish and nasty.
 
Taft2016 said:
They hide information like that from liberals in Pulitzer finalist histories.

Please, don't allow academia to interfere with your preconceived soundbites.
Click to expand...

In history the most important and prestigious award is not the Pulitzer it is the Bancroft Prize!

You keep saying the book that contained this insipid argument was a finalist as if that in itself means something. It doesn't! You never explained why it didn't win, why do you think it was only a finalist? hummm
 
Taft2016 said:
Cool!

You're doubling down on your absolutist moronic argument! Superb. This will be one to bookmark!
Click to expand...

It is always easy to tell who is a loser on this site, Tom thanks them.
Count every thank from Tom as a degrading event in your life.
 
Dantès said:
In history the most important and prestigious award is not the Pulitzer it is the Bancroft Prize!

You keep saying it was a finalist as if that in itself means something. It doesn't! You never explained why it didn't win, why do you think it was only a finalist? hummm
Click to expand...

Why are you so appalling at geography as well as being a pompous twat?? Amchitka is an island in the Aleutians which are part of Alaska, to get to it from Vancouver you have to travel across the Pacific, you dumb fuck!!

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...enate-on-climate-change&p=1452215#post1452215
 
Dantès said:
You keep saying the book that contained this insipid argument was a finalist as if that in itself means something. It doesn't! You never explained why it didn't win, why do you think it was only a finalist? hummm
Click to expand...

Wow. This argument is even weaker. Dead Michael Jackson could beat this one up and take its lunch money.

If I were to say "So-and-so is gorgeous. She was a runner up in the Miss Universe contest."

Your answer would apparently be:

"How can you say she's gorgeous when she didn't win? Hummmmm?"

You're a dick and your arguments suck big scabby cocks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top