Movon dot org bites off man's finger in support of Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see, so you press others to admit when they are wrong and refuse to do so when you are wrong?

I based my comments on the info at YOUR link, and then posted an alternative source. My comments were still valid based on the info. If that changed after I left the thread and lost interest, its not anything I am going to loose sleep over.

But if it makes you feel better:

To all readers of this thread - apparently I made comments based on faulty information. I was wrong. I apologize for all those who look to me for information. My apologies for my error and for losing interest in this thread.

Now SM can sleep better. lol

I sleep soundly regardless.

Typical liberal apology though- blame someone else besides yourself, and disingenuous. LOL
 
I sleep soundly regardless.

Typical liberal apology though- blame someone else besides yourself, and disingenuous. LOL

LMAO!!

Oh, and what was the problem with that? I posted a link to a news article that provided a different view point and different information. I rarely go back and make sure nothing changes. And I doubt you do either. The fact that the report was not accurate is hardly my fault.

And you were the one who got hissy when I commented on your post. You then added additional info and wanted to give me shit because I didn't know it.

Get a grip, SM, and leave the vendettas alone. You lose a few and you win a few. Its how life goes.
 
LMAO!!

Oh, and what was the problem with that? I posted a link to a news article that provided a different view point and different information. I rarely go back and make sure nothing changes. And I doubt you do either. The fact that the report was not accurate is hardly my fault.

And you were the one who got hissy when I commented on your post. You then added additional info and wanted to give me shit because I didn't know it.

Get a grip, SM, and leave the vendettas alone. You lose a few and you win a few. Its how life goes.
Actually you seem to lose just about all of them.

I posted my info after I confirmed it with a second source; in fact I stated such directly to you. Then you posted an older, wrong article without any confirmation.

Do not doubt The Southern Man. :readit:
 
Actually you seem to lose just about all of them.

I posted my info after I confirmed it with a second source; in fact I stated such directly to you. Then you posted an older, wrong article without any confirmation.

Do not doubt The Southern Man. :readit:

When I posted my first post, it was based on the information in YOUR post.

Then you try to blast me for not knowing the additional information that you had but had not posted. Nice try, sparky.


I guess you didn't like my apology?

Hmm, let me double check.........Nope, still don't give a shit. lol
 
LOL and you took the side of the instigator.

Your original post was:
"The Thousand Oaks Police Department is looking for a man who they say bit a finger off the left hand of a counter protester at a rally over health insurance reform Wednesday night. It happened around 7:30 PM at a pro health insurance reform rally and vigil at Hillcrest Drive and Lynn Road that was sponsored by Move-On-Dot-Org. Deputies say that during the otherwise peaceful event, a group of counter protesters showed up across the street. At one point, there was a heated exchange and during that the fight broke out between two men. They say during that fight the pro reform demonstrator allegedly bit the little finger off the left hand of the counter demonstrator. The 65-year-old male victim was taken to Los Robles Medical Center where there was apparently an effort to reattach the finger. The suspect fled and is still at large. He was described by deputies as a white male, short, with a medium build."


Please point out where it says who the instigator was?? Come on, SM, you made the claim now point it out.



I simply posted:

"Sounds like two people from different sides got into a fight.

Shit happens in a fight."

Simple, accurate, and not talking about either side or even picking sides.


To which you responded:

"Actually, the moveon guy has been identified as being much younger than his victim, who was the oldest man in a group of counter protesters. The moveon guy walked across a multi-lane street through traffic, targeted the weakest person in the group, got in his face, dragged him onto the street, then bit his finger off. I just heard an eyewitness account on the radio during lunch.

Leave it to a liberal to side with a vicious maniac. "


I still haven't seen anything to suggest the man "targeted the weakest person in the group" as you claim.

And your "Leave it to a liberal to side with a vicious maniac." was obviously just you wanted to personally attack me. It had nothing to do with any of the facts post to that point.

Just more of your personal vendetta against me. Like I said, get a grip. Everyone on these forums loses a debate. No one wins them all. Put your ego in check and get back to posting relevant material.
 
Your original post was:
"The Thousand Oaks Police Department is looking for a man who they say bit a finger off the left hand of a counter protester at a rally over health insurance reform Wednesday night. It happened around 7:30 PM at a pro health insurance reform rally and vigil at Hillcrest Drive and Lynn Road that was sponsored by Move-On-Dot-Org. Deputies say that during the otherwise peaceful event, a group of counter protesters showed up across the street. At one point, there was a heated exchange and during that the fight broke out between two men. They say during that fight the pro reform demonstrator allegedly bit the little finger off the left hand of the counter demonstrator. The 65-year-old male victim was taken to Los Robles Medical Center where there was apparently an effort to reattach the finger. The suspect fled and is still at large. He was described by deputies as a white male, short, with a medium build."


Please point out where it says who the instigator was?? Come on, SM, you made the claim now point it out.



I simply posted:

"Sounds like two people from different sides got into a fight.

Shit happens in a fight."

Simple, accurate, and not talking about either side or even picking sides.


To which you responded:

"Actually, the moveon guy has been identified as being much younger than his victim, who was the oldest man in a group of counter protesters. The moveon guy walked across a multi-lane street through traffic, targeted the weakest person in the group, got in his face, dragged him onto the street, then bit his finger off. I just heard an eyewitness account on the radio during lunch.

Leave it to a liberal to side with a vicious maniac. "


I still haven't seen anything to suggest the man "targeted the weakest person in the group" as you claim.

And your "Leave it to a liberal to side with a vicious maniac." was obviously just you wanted to personally attack me. It had nothing to do with any of the facts post to that point.

Just more of your personal vendetta against me. Like I said, get a grip. Everyone on these forums loses a debate. No one wins them all. Put your ego in check and get back to posting relevant material.
Actually, in post 4 I correctly accused you of siding "with a vicious maniac". I identified him as the instigator then. Leave it to you to develop a caricature of my argument and try to debate that. LOL
 
Actually, in post 4 I correctly accused you of siding "with a vicious maniac". I identified him as the instigator then. Leave it to you to develop a caricature of my argument and try to debate that. LOL

In post 4 you identified him as the instigator. But what post was it that I said "Sounds like two people from different sides got into a fight.

Shit happens in a fight."

????

No caricature at all. Simple facts and the posts quoted.

You are really pressing to try and make this personal vendetta work, aren't you?
 
In post 4 you identified him as the instigator. But what post was it that I said "Sounds like two people from different sides got into a fight.

Shit happens in a fight."

????

No caricature at all. Simple facts and the posts quoted.

You are really pressing to try and make this personal vendetta work, aren't you?
Again, I correctly accused you of siding "with a vicious maniac", then I identified him as also the instigator. Now you attempt to claim that I accused you of siding with the instigator; this is your caricature.

No personal vendetta, as the truth is not personal.
 
Again, I correctly accused you of siding "with a vicious maniac", then I identified him as also the instigator. Now you attempt to claim that I accused you of siding with the instigator; this is your caricature.

No personal vendetta, as the truth is not personal.

You made baseless accusations.

Tell me one thing that I had said before you accused me of siding with vicious maniac, that showed I had sided with anyone?

That is what the entire argument is based on, so I challenge you to show the basis for your accusation that I sided with a vicious maniac.
 
You made baseless accusations.

Tell me one thing that I had said before you accused me of siding with vicious maniac, that showed I had sided with anyone?

That is what the entire argument is based on, so I challenge you to show the basis for your accusation that I sided with a vicious maniac.
You made an excuse for the guy's indefensible act in post 3. *shrug*
 
You made an excuse for the guy's indefensible act in post 3. *shrug*

WTF?

I said "Sounds like two people from different sides got into a fight. Shit happens in a fight. "

I didn't defend anyone.

You accused me of siding with a vicious maniac for absolutely no reason. I did not make an excuse. I made an observation about fights.

Maybe if you had been in a few you would know that shit DOES happen in a fight.
 
Yeah a guy bites off a 65 year old man's finger and it's just "shit happens". LOL

The article you posted said two people got into a fight. The age of one was listed but not the other. No info about the guy who bit the finger or about who started the fight.

So yeah, I posted "shit happens".

And you creatively decided that this was an opportunity to continue to try and stir up shit against me, so you accused me of defending a "vicious maniac". Totally unfounded and a completely transparent attempt to continue your personal vendetta. When you can't stick with the topic you attack people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top