Mr Trump supporter acted illegally - is this acceptable?

C

cordeela

Verified User
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
 
cordeela said:
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
Click to expand...

what are you talking about?
 
cordeela said:
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
Click to expand...

What about Biden supporters? Should they be held to the same standard? After all:

House Dems Unanimously Block Resolution Condemning Violence and Rioting
Click to expand...
https://freebeacon.com/2020-electio...k-resolution-condemning-violence-and-rioting/

House Democrats vote unanimously against resolution that condemns violence and rioting
Click to expand...
https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...esolution-that-condemns-violence-and-rioting/

As a side note to that, you'll find not one of the usual MSM suspects has a link to this story...
 
cordeela said:
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
Click to expand...

What did Biden Supporters do now- that compares to the insurrectionists?

Please tell us more about your WHAT-ABOUT-ISMS!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's start with what purported Trump supporters did, then move on to defining who both Trump supporters and Biden supporters are... How about that?
Click to expand...

OK! Trump supporters had a rally, and some didn't misbehave or break any laws- AND SOME did!

As far as who supports TRUMP- that's easy- TRUMPTARDS DO!

And who supports Biden? That would be everyone else but Trumptards!!

Any more questions?
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
OK! Trump supporters had a rally, and some didn't misbehave or break any laws- AND SOME did!

As far as who supports TRUMP- that's easy- TRUMPTARDS DO!
Click to expand...

Okay so far, so good... kind of...

And who supports Biden? That would be everyone else but Trumptards!!

Any more questions?
Click to expand...

This is not true.

Many people who would vote for Trump are voting against Biden but not for Trump. Call it the lessor of two evils. I for one am in that category. Trump may be bad, but Biden will be worse in my view.

Sure, Trump's a troll and a world class narcissist but he isn't the utter and complete corrupt, self-serving, idiotic, Leftist appeasing, retard Biden is.

Your reduction of the issue eliminated the finer points of why someone would choose Trump over Biden.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
OK! Trump supporters had a rally, and some didn't misbehave or break any laws- AND SOME did!

As far as who supports TRUMP- that's easy- TRUMPTARDS DO!

And who supports Biden? That would be everyone else but Trumptards!!

Any more questions?
Click to expand...
Its not rocket science - I was merely seeking to establish some semblance of logic in regard to selective tolerance for illegal action.
I/E Dems think it just fine ILLEGAL immigrants enter USA freely without challenge 0 knowing many are killers, rapists, druggies. Yet as soon as you perceive a Trump supporter MIGHT have committed illegality you are on it like a saddle on a horse.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Nice genetic fallacy in the form of an ad hominem. Want to respond to what's said rather than try to discredit the source?
Click to expand...

Then be honest. Dutch said all law breakers should pay and you responded with "what about Dems|. I suspect they would be included in"all." Also no ad hominem. Your sources suck counts if you are the source.
 
Just curious what is this thread in reference to, and what laws are Libs getting away with breaking that Cons are not????
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Okay so far, so good... kind of...



This is not true.

Many people who would vote for Trump are voting against Biden but not for Trump. Call it the lessor of two evils. I for one am in that category. Trump may be bad, but Biden will be worse in my view.

Sure, Trump's a troll and a world class narcissist but he isn't the utter and complete corrupt, self-serving, idiotic, Leftist appeasing, retard Biden is.

Your reduction of the issue eliminated the finer points of why someone would choose Trump over Biden.
Click to expand...

"Sure, Trump's a troll and a world class narcissist but he isn't the utter and complete corrupt, self-serving, idiotic, Leftist appeasing, retard Biden is".

That's exactly what Dotard is, one thing teabaggers (www.teaparty.org) have over ANY democrat is the lying and gaslighting.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Nice genetic fallacy in the form of an ad hominem. Want to respond to what's said rather than try to discredit the source?
Click to expand...

Not a “genetic fallacy,” a term suddenly wingers have adopted to defend their openly partisan sources, based on that logic, not accepting what the Onion puts out would be a “genetic fallacy,” established trustworthiness and common sense are the relevant judges not misused catch phrases from Logic 101

And the condemnation the House Republicans peddled was too generalized condemning basically any event occurring while the recent condemnation is over a specific event happening on a precise date and which was witnessed ongoing by all Americans
 
Nordberg said:
Then be honest. Dutch said all law breakers should pay and you responded with "what about Dems|. I suspect they would be included in"all." Also no ad hominem. Your sources suck counts if you are the source.
Click to expand...

I didn't respond to Dutch's post because I agreed with it. No discussion on that needed. Here, you are conflating two different things that I never stated as such.
 
archives said:
Not a “genetic fallacy,” a term suddenly wingers have adopted to defend their openly partisan sources, based on that logic, not accepting what the Onion puts out would be a “genetic fallacy,” established trustworthiness and common sense are the relevant judges not misused catch phrases from Logic 101

And the condemnation the House Republicans peddled was too generalized condemning basically any event occurring while the recent condemnation is over a specific event happening on a precise date and which was witnessed ongoing by all Americans
Click to expand...

I don't condemn Leftist sources out-of-hand like the Left does with Conservative and Right wing sources. So, when someone does that to a source I post, it is a genetic fallacy by definition. Attacking the source, rather than what's presented, is the epitome of a genetic fallacy. Thus when someone says something like "That's FOX News! They're worthless as a source..." or the like dismissing the information presented without rebuttal a genetic fallacy is committed.

That is exactly what Nordburg did when he posted this response:

You are really into far-right sources, aren't you?
Click to expand...

As he addressed that to me rather than the discussion, it also is an ad hominem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top