Mr Trump supporter acted illegally - is this acceptable?

CASPER said:
Just curious what is this thread in reference to, and what laws are Libs getting away with breaking that Cons are not????
Click to expand...

blm and antifa could riot for a year all over the country and media denied it was happening. trumptards riot once and it's armageddon in the media.

the double standard alone proves the bias of mm.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Exactly. But we know they aren't being treated that way. That is a problem.
Click to expand...

Who isn't being treated the same? Are you trying to come the actions of asshole protesters in Seattle to the actions of the asshole insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Who isn't being treated the same? Are you trying to come the actions of asshole protesters in Seattle to the actions of the asshole insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol?
Click to expand...

For the riots over the summer, particularly the ones targeting federal buildings like the courthouse in Portland, the FBI hasn't gone to anywhere near the same lengths to identify and arrest the rioters they have for the Capitol riot, as but one example.
The same goes for riots elsewhere. There's plenty of video where rioters are identified sufficiently on them that they could easily be arrested. One example is the woman that rented that U-Haul truck to bring riot materials to Antifa protesters in (I believe) Nashville. She should have been arrested on conspiracy charges to incite violence and rioting for her part in that riot, as another example.
As yet a third example, CHOP / CHAZ was a textbook definition of insurrection and every participant should have been arrested and charged. That would have been relatively easy to do as they were contained. Again, the Left's actions went largely unpunished.

But, the Left's riots, arson, looting, and violence, have largely gone unpunished whereas the one Right wing one on the Capitol sees participants being hunted down nationwide--almost gleefully, particularly by the Left in cahoots with federal law enforcement.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
For the riots over the summer, particularly the ones targeting federal buildings like the courthouse in Portland, the FBI hasn't gone to anywhere near the same lengths to identify and arrest the rioters they have for the Capitol riot, as but one example.
The same goes for riots elsewhere. There's plenty of video where rioters are identified sufficiently on them that they could easily be arrested. One example is the woman that rented that U-Haul truck to bring riot materials to Antifa protesters in (I believe) Nashville. She should have been arrested on conspiracy charges to incite violence and rioting for her part in that riot, as another example.
As yet a third example, CHOP / CHAZ was a textbook definition of insurrection and every participant should have been arrested and charged. That would have been relatively easy to do as they were contained. Again, the Left's actions went largely unpunished.

But, the Left's riots, arson, looting, and violence, have largely gone unpunished whereas the one Right wing one on the Capitol sees participants being hunted down nationwide--almost gleefully, particularly by the Left in cahoots with federal law enforcement.
Click to expand...

Not a lawyer, but I'm sure there are plenty of Sea Lawyers here who will side with you.

With the exception of those who attacked a federal building, all of the riots and confrontations are State, not Federal.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Not a lawyer, but I'm sure there are plenty of Sea Lawyers here who will side with you.

With the exception of those who attacked a federal building, all of the riots and confrontations are State, not Federal.
Click to expand...

So? States can ask for FBI assistance as many of those rioters crossed state lines to participate then re-crossed state lines after committing their crimes.

For example, the U-Haul lady I mentioned earlier. She was previously at Charlottesville VA, and could easily be classified as both a domestic terrorist and as a conspirator to riot and incite violence as a federal crime having participated in riots in several states.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
So? States can ask for FBI assistance as many of those rioters crossed state lines to participate then re-crossed state lines after committing their crimes.

For example, the U-Haul lady I mentioned earlier. She was previously at Charlottesville VA, and could easily be classified as both a domestic terrorist and as a conspirator to riot and incite violence as a federal crime having participated in riots in several states.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. It all goes to jurisdiction. It's also a matter of budgetary issues. It's not the Federal Taxpayer's responsibility to fund an FBI investigation because one city in one state are run by assholes.

Do you really want your taxes paying to solve Seattle's domestic issues? However, if a Federal crime has been committed, it's righteous that the Feds become involved.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Absolutely. It all goes to jurisdiction. It's also a matter of budgetary issues. It's not the Federal Taxpayer's responsibility to fund an FBI investigation because one city in one state are run by assholes.

Do you really want your taxes paying to solve Seattle's domestic issues? However, if a Federal crime has been committed, it's righteous that the Feds become involved.
Click to expand...

Absolutely. This is because if you apply the law fully to all rioters, insurrectionists, etc., now it will dramatically reduce the number of instances in the future for quite a while and overall end up costing less than letting them get away with things.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Absolutely. This is because if you apply the law fully to all rioters, insurrectionists, etc., now it will dramatically reduce the number of instances in the future for quite a while and overall end up costing less than letting them get away with things.
Click to expand...

Which goes back to the point I made before; you and others are advocating full Federal rule over all Americans regardless of State's Rights.

While that may seem convenient now, I think empowering the Feds any more than they are now is a very, very bad idea. In fact, I favor taking back some powers from the Feds and giving them to the States. You and several Trump fans obviously disagree.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What about Biden supporters? Should they be held to the same standard? After all:


https://freebeacon.com/2020-electio...k-resolution-condemning-violence-and-rioting/


https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com...esolution-that-condemns-violence-and-rioting/

As a side note to that, you'll find not one of the usual MSM suspects has a link to this story...
Click to expand...

In reading the actual legislation one could truthfully say that Republicans vote to take away local control from cities while condemning violence by BLM and ignoring RW violence.

Since you want everyone held to the same standard you should be one of those that opposed this biased legislation.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
In reading the actual legislation one could truthfully say that Republicans vote to take away local control from cities while condemning violence by BLM and ignoring RW violence.

Since you want everyone held to the same standard you should be one of those that opposed this biased legislation.
Click to expand...

So you WANT mayors to allow violence by BLM and Antifa, destroying their cities. Gotit.
 
cordeela said:
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
Click to expand...

Meth - not even once.
 
cordeela said:
When Mr Trump supporters act illegally should they be held ti account or free to go. Especially when Slow Biden supporters break the law but their crimes are "NOT crimes".
Should we all not be held to account for illegal behaviour?
Click to expand...

Why can't you be more specific? You make such half-assed threads. Explain yourself first. The first few posts in response are about you explaining what you are talking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top