Multi million dollar law suit filed against Trump

[Poor Richard Saunders]

I don't know about her case being terribly strong, although I do applaud the sentiment behind it. She will have to prove that 1) Sicknick's death was a direct result of the attack and wouldn't have otherwise occurred, 2) Trump was clearly culpable in causing the attack, and 3) Sicknick was supporting her, his death caused financial and mental hardship, and that he would have continued to support her had he lived. This part would have been stronger if they had been married. We don't know at this point what their relationship was.

I hope that it doesn't get dismissed out of hand for lack of standing or something. Good for her.

1. Sicknick's death was listed as in the line of duty.
2. The standard is preponderance of evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Wrongful death lawsuits don't require proof of financial hardship otherwise we would be living in "The Purge of Rich people."

 

[Yakuda]

I don't know about her case being terribly strong, although I do applaud the sentiment behind it. She will have to prove that 1) Sicknick's death was a direct result of the attack and wouldn't have otherwise occurred, 2) Trump was clearly culpable in causing the attack, and 3) Sicknick was supporting her, his death caused financial and mental hardship, and that he would have continued to support her had he lived. This part would have been stronger if they had been married. We don't know at this point what their relationship was.

I hope that it doesn't get dismissed out of hand for lack of standing or something. Good for her.

Hey Richard here's a great example. This owl broad "...applauds the sentiment..." of the lawsuit. What's the "sentiment" referred to here? I suspect it's, let's fuck trump. I don't have a particular problem with that by itself necessarily I just which they would stop pretending it's for some more lofty purpose.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Ok so? You don't think that will ruin trump do you? Be certainly will never be in jail.

You have backtracked from they have never found anything to what they have found won't ruin him.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Hey Richard here's a great example. This owl broad "...applauds the sentiment..." of the lawsuit. What's the "sentiment" referred to here? I suspect it's, let's fuck trump. I don't have a particular problem with that by itself necessarily I just which they would stop pretending it's for some more lofty purpose.

Lawsuits can't be filed based on sentiment. They are supposed to be filed based on the law. Then the courts decide if they law is being applied correctly. Frivolous lawsuits are ones where those filing the lawsuit are trying to claim the law is something other than what it is.
In the case of Trump's attempt to sue Hillary, his lawyers simply ignored the statute of limitations in filing the lawsuit. That made it frivolous since that is so basic to following the law.

 

[Yakuda]

You have backtracked from they have never found anything to what they have found won't ruin him.

They havent

 

[Yakuda]

Lawsuits can't be filed based on sentiment. They are supposed to be filed based on the law. Then the courts decide if they law is being applied correctly. Frivolous lawsuits are ones where those filing the lawsuit are trying to claim the law is something other than what it is.
In the case of Trump's attempt to sue Hillary, his lawyers simply ignored the statute of limitations in filing the lawsuit. That made it frivolous since that is so basic to following the law.

A frivolous lawsuit is one that has no legal merit. Like claiming trump incited a riot. Not legal merit.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I also know nothing about the details, but unlike you I dont spew meaningless shit when I am lacking details.

oh come on now.....when have you ever done anything else?.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So you think Trump should be in prison for filing frivolous lawsuits?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...rt-has-no-merit-as-a-lawsuit/?sh=49a99af757c9

A federal judge in Florida threw out former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton over the 2016 election on Thursday, dismissing the ex-president’s allegations as “unsupported by any legal authority” after he accused Clinton and other Democratic officials of a “far-reaching conspiracy” aiming to take down his first presidential campaign.

and yet we now know the FBI and Hilliary's campaign did exactly that.....

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

1. Sicknick's death was listed as in the line of duty.
2. The standard is preponderance of evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
3. Wrongful death lawsuits don't require proof of financial hardship otherwise we would be living in "The Purge of Rich people."

Thanks, hope that she wins. His family deserves compensation.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

and yet we now know the FBI and Hilliary's campaign did exactly that.....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

not that familiar with ambulance chaser laws.....perhaps Jarot can fill us in......do girlfriends have standing for wrongful death cases?......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

if you want to post selfies do it in the lounge......and if that's your penis on the right, put it in the NSFW area......

 

[Saint Guinefort]

if you want to post selfies do it in the lounge......and if that's your penis on the right, put it in the NSFW area......

LOL. But you post your ass much of the time....why do I have to post somewhere else?

 

[Libhater]

It's easy to see why you are a Cultist; you have no clue how legal things work nor do you care, as long as you can carry his corrupt baggage for him.

I have no clue as to how legal things work? LOL! What I know to be fact that every so-called legal action taken against our greatest modern day president (Trump) has ended up in the trash bin of a losing action. Again, tell me oh bright one just what physical action Trump did that would be considered to be worthy of indicting Trump for as related to that J-6 riot? How did the J-6 committee work out for their attempt to once again bring various and useless charges against Trump's role in that riot? In fact, haven't heard much about that idiot merick garland's attempt to further these useless and partisan attacks on Trump with the Mar-a-Lago clown show? Have you heard anything about any update concerning Trump possibly doing jail time for his many crimes? LMFAO! Get a life OWL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

A frivolous lawsuit is one that has no legal merit. Like claiming trump incited a riot. Not legal merit.

The problem with your argument is that the courts have already ruled that claiming Trump incited a riot does have legal merit. The courts rely on the law, not the sentiment that you are relying on.

Whether a plaintiff can convince a jury that Trump incited a riot is something we don't know yet since no jury has yet heard the arguments but the courts have ruled that there is enough legal merit in the claim for it to go to a jury.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

and yet we now know the FBI and Hilliary's campaign did exactly that.....

LOL.. Sure you do. Do you keep that right next to your one eyed one horned flying purple people eater?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Thanks, hope that she wins. His family deserves compensation.

She still has to convince a jury that Trump knew that the people were armed and likely to attack the Capitol. That could be a toss up at this point depending on what the court allows for testimony and defense.
I would think it's more likely that it doesn't go to court and Trump pays $2-3 million to settle.

 

[floridafan]

Wrongful death complaints against Trump? LOL! What exactly was Trump's physical role in the death of that Capitol police officer? If anything is to be considered a lawsuit about the riot (and not about a phony insurrection) it should be a lawsuit against that capitol officer who murdered that unarmed female veteran.

If it wasn't for trump there would not have been an insurrection

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

She still has to convince a jury that Trump knew that the people were armed and likely to attack the Capitol. That could be a toss up at this point depending on what the court allows for testimony and defense.
I would think it's more likely that it doesn't go to court and Trump pays $2-3 million to settle.

That's also good. About time he reaps what he has sown.

 

[floridafan]

Hey Richard here's a great example. This owl broad "...applauds the sentiment..." of the lawsuit. What's the "sentiment" referred to here? I suspect it's, let's fuck trump. I don't have a particular problem with that by itself necessarily I just which they would stop pretending it's for some more lofty purpose.

Your comment is interesting since you dont know a single detail of the lawsuit.