Murderers Bury The Body

F

Flanders

Verified User
When I saw this cartoon:

MC_voodoo_web20201215012104.jpg

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/MC_voodoo_web20201215012104.jpg
​

I immediate thought Supreme Court justices carried their victim off to the cemetery posthaste:


 
Flanders said:
When I saw this cartoon:

I immediate thought Supreme Court justices carried their victim off to the cemetery posthaste:


[/CENTER]
Click to expand...


quit lying, conspiracy nut. you are incapable of thought, or you would not believe the Supreme Court is part of the Obama Deep State when 6 of the 9 Justices were appointed by repub presidents, 3 by shitstain liar Trump himself.

you are insane in the membrane.
 
Flanders said:
In fact, the building has long been a chicken coop.
Click to expand...

I agree. It morphed into that over centuries because politicians lack the balls to hold the judges accountable, in spite of the incredibly low bar that the Constitution gives to get rid of them.
 
"you are too stupid to understand. why aren't you on the short bus to school, already?"

The irony of this quote is no doubt beyond it's writer's comprehension.
 
Former New Hampshire GOP chairwoman proclaims she’s leaving the party over Texas lawsuit

On Thursday, writing for USA TODAY, former New Hampshire Republican Party Chairwoman Jennifer Horn announced she was leaving the GOP, accusing her former party of having “ransacked the Constitution” — and directly fingering their support of the failed Texas lawsuit that sought to throw out millions of ballots in swing states.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/12/fo...ms-shes-leaving-the-party-over-texas-lawsuit/
 
Flanders said:
Click to expand...

​

​
The chickens are pecking. Sidney Powell has to spray some Anti-Pek medicine on the justices:




Amid a demand by Dominion Voting Systems that she retract her fraud claims as well as a motion by the city of Detroit to disbar her, attorney Sidney Powell said Thursday her emergency petitions for Georgia and Michigan election-fraud cases are on the U.S. Supreme Court docket.

She said, however, on Twitter, that the high court is "slow-walking" the cases by not requiring a response from the states until Jan. 14.

Also on Thursday, she said, her emergency petitions for Arizona and Wisconsin cases were "inexplicably rejected" after copies of documents were hand-delivered and all fees were paid.

Powell said the Supreme Court clerk refused to give a reason and will not return phone calls.

"What is going on?" she asked. "Unprecedented lack of professionalism."

The Michigan complaint contends that at least 200,000 fradulent votes were cast in the state, surpassing the official margin of 154,000 votes.

The complaint includes the report of the forensic audit of Dominion voting machines used in Antrim County, where 6,000 votes were flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden. The report concluded the system "intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors."

Dominion Voting Systems fired off a letter to Powell demanding she publicly retract her "wild, knowingly baseless and false accusations" about their voting machines, the New York Times reported Thursday.

The city of Detroit, meanwhile, has filed a motion asking a federal judge to fine Powell and her legal team, insisting they be banned from practicing in the Eastern District in Michigan and be referred to the state bar for grievance proceedings.

"It's time for this nonsense to end," city lawyer David Fink told Law & Crime in a phone interview. "The lawyers filing these frivolous cases that undermine democracy must pay a price."

Fink's motion charged that "the mere filing of a suit (no matter how frivolous) could, without any evidence, raise doubts in the minds of millions of Americans about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election."

After filing emergency requests to the Supreme Court to order officials in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona to de-certify their 2020 election results, Powell told the Epoch Times on Sunday that "especially insidious and troubling is the machine fraud conducted through the Dominion voting systems."

"In fact, one of our experts says Dominion fraud was 5% higher votes for Biden across the board everywhere there was a Dominion machine running. The same was true for other Democrats that were running on the tickets in those states," she said.

Powell, who is not part of the Trump campaign legal team, also suggested Trump could invoke his 2018 executive order calling on the director of national intelligence to assess evidence of foreign interference in an election.

If John Ratcliffe, the DNI, were to conduct such an assessment, she said, it would "blow the mind of every citizen in the country who's willing to look at the truth and the facts."

"Because there's never – we've never witnessed anything like this in the history of this country," said Powell. "And it's got to be stopped right now or there will never be a free and fair election."

However, the report due Friday has been delayed, and an intelligence source told the Washington Examiner it will not focus on claims that voting machines flipped millions of votes or of mail-in ballot fraud.

Nevertheless, CBS News reporter Catherine Herridge reported Wednesday that Ratcliffe told her China did interfere in the 2020 election.

The delay in issuing the report, the Examiner reported, was because of clashes among senior officials over the communist regime's role.

​

​


Sidney Powell: Supreme Court 'slow-walking' my cases
By Art Moore
Published December 17, 2020 at 8:06pm

https://www.wnd.com/2020/12/4878340/
​
 
Dark Soul said:
I agree. It morphed into that over centuries because politicians lack the balls to hold the judges accountable, in spite of the incredibly low bar that the Constitution gives to get rid of them.
Click to expand...

Really?
The first step is proving them wrong or to prove corruption, they can be impeached, censured or removed from office.
 
Flanders said:

​

​
The chickens are pecking. Sidney Powell has to spray some Anti-Pek medicine on the justices:




Amid a demand by Dominion Voting Systems that she retract her fraud claims as well as a motion by the city of Detroit to disbar her, attorney Sidney Powell said Thursday her emergency petitions for Georgia and Michigan election-fraud cases are on the U.S. Supreme Court docket.

She said, however, on Twitter, that the high court is "slow-walking" the cases by not requiring a response from the states until Jan. 14.

Also on Thursday, she said, her emergency petitions for Arizona and Wisconsin cases were "inexplicably rejected" after copies of documents were hand-delivered and all fees were paid.

Powell said the Supreme Court clerk refused to give a reason and will not return phone calls.

"What is going on?" she asked. "Unprecedented lack of professionalism."

The Michigan complaint contends that at least 200,000 fradulent votes were cast in the state, surpassing the official margin of 154,000 votes.

The complaint includes the report of the forensic audit of Dominion voting machines used in Antrim County, where 6,000 votes were flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden. The report concluded the system "intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors."

Dominion Voting Systems fired off a letter to Powell demanding she publicly retract her "wild, knowingly baseless and false accusations" about their voting machines, the New York Times reported Thursday.

The city of Detroit, meanwhile, has filed a motion asking a federal judge to fine Powell and her legal team, insisting they be banned from practicing in the Eastern District in Michigan and be referred to the state bar for grievance proceedings.

"It's time for this nonsense to end," city lawyer David Fink told Law & Crime in a phone interview. "The lawyers filing these frivolous cases that undermine democracy must pay a price."

Fink's motion charged that "the mere filing of a suit (no matter how frivolous) could, without any evidence, raise doubts in the minds of millions of Americans about the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election."

After filing emergency requests to the Supreme Court to order officials in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona to de-certify their 2020 election results, Powell told the Epoch Times on Sunday that "especially insidious and troubling is the machine fraud conducted through the Dominion voting systems."

"In fact, one of our experts says Dominion fraud was 5% higher votes for Biden across the board everywhere there was a Dominion machine running. The same was true for other Democrats that were running on the tickets in those states," she said.

Powell, who is not part of the Trump campaign legal team, also suggested Trump could invoke his 2018 executive order calling on the director of national intelligence to assess evidence of foreign interference in an election.

If John Ratcliffe, the DNI, were to conduct such an assessment, she said, it would "blow the mind of every citizen in the country who's willing to look at the truth and the facts."

"Because there's never – we've never witnessed anything like this in the history of this country," said Powell. "And it's got to be stopped right now or there will never be a free and fair election."

However, the report due Friday has been delayed, and an intelligence source told the Washington Examiner it will not focus on claims that voting machines flipped millions of votes or of mail-in ballot fraud.

Nevertheless, CBS News reporter Catherine Herridge reported Wednesday that Ratcliffe told her China did interfere in the 2020 election.

The delay in issuing the report, the Examiner reported, was because of clashes among senior officials over the communist regime's role.

​

​


Sidney Powell: Supreme Court 'slow-walking' my cases
By Art Moore
Published December 17, 2020 at 8:06pm

https://www.wnd.com/2020/12/4878340/
​
Click to expand...

Wow, dumb enough to post that loony woman that even teabaggers insist she take the short bus to Dotard's ego rallies.
 
no worries said:
. . . loony woman . . .
Click to expand...

To no worries: Lin Wood has to be ruining your life if you dislike Sidney Powell for demanding a fair shake:

"This may be most important tweet of my life," Wood started. "Chief Justice John Roberts is corrupt & should resign immediately. Justice Stephen Breyer should also resign immediately. They are “anti-Trumpers” dedicated to preventing public from knowing TRUTH of @realDonaldTrump re-election."
​


"Most Important Tweet of my Life": Attorney Lin Wood Unleashes on Justice John Roberts, Calls For HIs Resignation
CollinRugg
Posted December 17, 2020

https://trendingpolitics.com/most-i...lls-for-his-resignation/?utm_source=economics
​

I love this picture taken from the article:

 
Dark Soul said:
Nope. The bar is much lower. Read the Constitution and learn.
Click to expand...

Nope, not much “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States” shall be removed from office if convicted in an impeachment trial of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

One judge was removed/quit for continually showing up drunk, another was removed because it was found after the trial, he had business dealings with the litigant.
Both quit instead of going through impeachment.

Most were charged with improper behavior or were proven wrong by lawyers, incompetence.
 
Flanders said:
Click to expand...






matt-patrick.jpg

Texas elector Matt Patrick during the Electoral College vote in Texas Dec. 14, 2020 (Video screenshot)
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/matt-patrick.jpg





Whether or not Matt Patrick overheard Roberts screaming, the liberal Chief Justice crows like a rooster every time he opens his mouth:


A claim repeated by a Texas elector that Chief Justice John Roberts was heard from an adjacent room at the Supreme Court building screaming at colleagues for considering the Texas election-fraud case has a fundamental flaw.

The justices have been meeting remotely for the past two months during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Nevertheless, video of Texas elector and State Republican Executive Committee official Matt Patrick making the claim Monday at the Texas State House has gone viral on social media.

"This is an absurd fantasy," said Ed Whelan, the president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, of Patrick's claim.
​

QUESTION: Why should any American believe Ed Whelan more than they believe Matt Patrick? ANSWER: They should not. Nobody should believe anything said by a lawyer overseeing ‘ethics.’


"For starters, the Justices haven't been having in-person conferences," tweeted Whelan, a former clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

The Supreme Court posted a statement on its website Oct. 9 that said: "The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins."

Later Friday, a Supreme Court public information officer said the justices have been conducting conferences by phone since March.

With C-SPAN cameras rolling during the Electoral College vote on Monday, Patrick cited a "report" he read "online" from a "current staffer for one of the Supreme Court justices."

The report said the nine justices went into a closed room to discuss cases, and when the Texas case was brought up, the staffer said, in Patrick's words, he "heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up."

Patrick said Roberts reacted to Justices Alito and Thomas bringing up the Bush v. Gore 2000 election case, yelling "I don't give a *** about that case, arguing "at that time, we didn't have riots."
​

See this thread:

Al Gore set the precedent when he tried to steal the election in 2000. Precedence supposedly carries a lot of weight in the High Court. If that is true, surely Al Gore’s precedence applies to President Trump.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Al-Gore-A-Big-Thank-You&p=4024392#post4024392


So what he was saying was that he was afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing," Patrick said. "And I'm sorry, but that is moral cowardice."

He said the charge of the Supreme Court is to be "our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty."

The "online" report Patrick cited apparently was a Dec. 12 article published on the website of the "Hal Turner Radio Show" titled "Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED," based on a "source deep inside the US Supreme Court."
​

​


FACT CHECK: Did chief justice really scream at colleagues about Texas election case?
​
 
Flanders said:






matt-patrick.jpg

Texas elector Matt Patrick during the Electoral College vote in Texas Dec. 14, 2020 (Video screenshot)
https://www.wnd.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/matt-patrick.jpg





Whether or not Matt Patrick overheard Roberts screaming, the liberal Chief Justice crows like a rooster every time he opens his mouth:


A claim repeated by a Texas elector that Chief Justice John Roberts was heard from an adjacent room at the Supreme Court building screaming at colleagues for considering the Texas election-fraud case has a fundamental flaw.

The justices have been meeting remotely for the past two months during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Nevertheless, video of Texas elector and State Republican Executive Committee official Matt Patrick making the claim Monday at the Texas State House has gone viral on social media.

"This is an absurd fantasy," said Ed Whelan, the president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, of Patrick's claim.
​

QUESTION: Why should any American believe Ed Whelan more than they believe Matt Patrick? ANSWER: They should not. Nobody should believe anything said by a lawyer overseeing ‘ethics.’


"For starters, the Justices haven't been having in-person conferences," tweeted Whelan, a former clerk for the late Justice Antonin Scalia.

The Supreme Court posted a statement on its website Oct. 9 that said: "The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins."

Later Friday, a Supreme Court public information officer said the justices have been conducting conferences by phone since March.

With C-SPAN cameras rolling during the Electoral College vote on Monday, Patrick cited a "report" he read "online" from a "current staffer for one of the Supreme Court justices."

The report said the nine justices went into a closed room to discuss cases, and when the Texas case was brought up, the staffer said, in Patrick's words, he "heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up."

Patrick said Roberts reacted to Justices Alito and Thomas bringing up the Bush v. Gore 2000 election case, yelling "I don't give a *** about that case, arguing "at that time, we didn't have riots."
​

See this thread:

Al Gore set the precedent when he tried to steal the election in 2000. Precedence supposedly carries a lot of weight in the High Court. If that is true, surely Al Gore’s precedence applies to President Trump.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Al-Gore-A-Big-Thank-You&p=4024392#post4024392


So what he was saying was that he was afraid of what would happen if they did the right thing," Patrick said. "And I'm sorry, but that is moral cowardice."

He said the charge of the Supreme Court is to be "our final line of defense for right and wrong, and they did not do their duty."

The "online" report Patrick cited apparently was a Dec. 12 article published on the website of the "Hal Turner Radio Show" titled "Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit – COURT INTIMIDATED," based on a "source deep inside the US Supreme Court."
​

​


FACT CHECK: Did chief justice really scream at colleagues about Texas election case?
​
Click to expand...

the fact you think john roberts is a liberal proves how unattached to reality you are. do you stay drunk all the time or what?
 
Hoosier Daddy said:
the fact you think john roberts is a liberal proves how unattached to reality you are. do you stay drunk all the time or what?
Click to expand...

To Hoosier Daddy: Asshole. Any justice that can invent a tax to justify Obamacare is a liberal; will always be a liberal until his dying day.

Note that Roberts always votes with the Democrats on the big ones —— not because they are right, but because Roberts believes in the Democrat Party’s governing philosophy more than he believes in the Constitution.

For the record. I knew what Roberts is during his conformation hearings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top