USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You've just proven yourself to be an idiot, again; because this had nothing to do with "Christian Law".
Muslims Demand Sharia Trial In Minnesota Court
- Thread starter USFREEDOM911
- Start date
You've just proven yourself to be an idiot, again; because this had nothing to do with "Christian Law".
Then give an example of where a "Christian" demanded that a court case be settled using this supposed "Christian Law".
OH and please make it something within this Century.
Easy.
Where "Christians" demand that they don't have to provide marriage licenses to gays based on their "Christian" principles. Where "Christians" claim they don't have to obey public accommodation laws to serve gays based on their "Christian" principles.
You're not even a challenge, Rufus.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Amen bro. Then nuke the fuckers
Why liberals defend a group of people who follow the words of a pedophile is beyond me
I hear KKKhristiefan is having to have her burqa specially made to fit her fat ass
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Sorry; but you still haven't shown where anyone said in Court that they wanted the Judge to use Christian Law.
You've done some pandering to the left; but haven't proved a thing.
Sorry; but you still haven't shown where anyone said in Court that they wanted the Judge to use Christian Law.
You've done some pandering to the left; but haven't proved a thing.
I just gave you two examples where "Christians" demanded that their "Christian" principles transcended the law. I can't help it that you're too fucking stupid to comprehend the truth to that.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
And still failing to show where it was requested that a Judge follow "Christian Law".
You fucked up when you used "requested".
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You may have given two "examples"; but you've still been unable to fulfill the request.
I'll reiterate it, just so you can see where you've failed.
Then give an example of where a "Christian" demanded that a court case be settled using this supposed "Christian Law".
OH and please make it something within this Century.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
You fucked up when you used the word "settled". But if you want to go there...Weingartz.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Still waiting!!
And maybe you would be so kind as to also post the Judge's response.
I already gave it to you. Weingartz. Satisfies everything you asked for.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
AWWWWWWWWWW; but you didn't.
I will have give you marks for at least trying to defend your failure.
Yep. You're too stupid.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
You've just proven yourself to be an idiot, again; because this had nothing to do with "Christian Law".
Boy HOWDY did I call that one!
What a total surprise that USF won't admit when he is wrong.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
You will never get USF to admit he was wrong.
It's the main reason he refuses to respond to my questions...he lacks the character to acknowledge his failings.
Just another ignorant RW pussy. Zero comprehension of the topics he posts on. All hat, no cowboy.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
And yet, you're still unable to show anything that is similar.
So Sad
Too Bad
Sucks to be you.
And yet, you're still unable to show anything that is similar.
So Sad
Too Bad
Sucks to be you.
Already did, menstrual swab. You're too fucking stupid to get it
I'd like to see a clever dramatic enactment of a Western Judge
replying to the musalman desiring to be adjudicated using Sharia doctrine:
"According to Sharia you are defrauding your court-complaint"
"According to Sharia you are wrong"
"And by the way Habib, in this court house we already have an expert authority of the Law,
and that authority of the Law is me.
That is why YOU address me here as "YOUR Honor",
my dear Habib, we are in the temple of law,
where Laws here are at least 5,000 years old.
My dear Habib, how merciful has providence been to you
that you are paying witness to the workings of the Laws of Society".
replying to the musalman desiring to be adjudicated using Sharia doctrine:
"According to Sharia you are defrauding your court-complaint"
"According to Sharia you are wrong"
"And by the way Habib, in this court house we already have an expert authority of the Law,
and that authority of the Law is me.
That is why YOU address me here as "YOUR Honor",
my dear Habib, we are in the temple of law,
where Laws here are at least 5,000 years old.
My dear Habib, how merciful has providence been to you
that you are paying witness to the workings of the Laws of Society".