"MUST END NOW" TRUMP MOANS AS INVESTIGATORS PROBE his SKETCHY BUSINESS.

What a hair brained theory lol.

There are a million and one ways to get publicity—along with a Moscow Trump Tower, without the million and one headaches that come with being president.

You get an A+ for imagination though.

It well documented that he never thought he'd win.. didn't care about winning the presidency. He wanted to bump up his brand.
 
Ex-Trump Insider: Donald Doesn’t Want to Be President ...


REUTERS/Mark Kauzlarich. In an open letter to voters supporting Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary, the former communications director of Trump’s now-defunct Super PAC said that the former reality television star not only never expected to be the Republican nominee, much less president, but never even wanted to be.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/03/28/Ex-Trump-Insider-Donald-Doesn-t-Want-Be-President
 
Stephanie Cegielski said that when she was brought aboard as communications director for the Make America Great Again PAC last summer, the instructions from Trump Tower were to make sure that Trump finished a respectable second in the GOP primary. It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidate.
 
It well documented that he never thought he'd win.. didn't care about winning the presidency. He wanted to bump up his brand.
he did said he was surprised that he pulled it off kina thing.
The claim from the lunatics is that "he did not want to win"
 
Donald Trump Didn’t Want to Be President

excerpt:

As the campaign came to an end, Trump himself was sanguine. His ultimate goal, after all, had never been to win. “I can be the most famous man in the world,” he had told his aide Sam Nunberg at the outset of the race. His longtime friend Roger Ailes, the former head of Fox News, liked to say that if you want a career in television, first run for president. Now Trump, encouraged by Ailes, was floating rumors about a Trump network. It was a great future. He would come out of this campaign, Trump assured Ailes, with a far more powerful brand and untold opportunities.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html
 
It bears repeating time and again:

They knew there was no collusion. Collusion was a pretext to open a crime search on Trump and involve SDNY at some point. I’d love to know if there was any prior communications between SDNY, McCabe, Comey or Strzok before Mullet was appointed. Maybe we can get another SC appointed to ask that and a host of other questions.

Collusion was a bill of goods sold to a media that were either willing accomplices or were just a little too willing to believe a story they liked the sound of [think Covington kids and/or Smollett] in order to gin-up sufficient political will to get an SC appointed.

It’s the biggest political scandal in the history of the republic.
I don't even think it was originally a crime search. I think it was nothing more then the cabal's using Steele as a pretext to spy on him and back door his campaign as well as the honey trap at the bar,,
But truthfully who knows what motivated these traitors. we can only hope they get indicted.

Brennan is 100% psychopath as it is, and a huge Hillary fan - so it's probable a bunch of corrupt cross purposes
 
he did said he was surprised that he pulled it off kina thing.
The claim from the lunatics is that "he did not want to win"

There's too much evidence to the contrary even if you are unwilling to look at the evidence.
 
such moralizing to turn over an election result is anti_American.
Once a person is elected to Office we don't look back to impeach them for crimes/malfeasance they did before holding Office. You want revenge for losing the election - not "justice" .

The Special Council - but even more the SDNY by the looks of it is taking the fruit of the Mueller investigation
and launching far ranging investigations without otherwise probable cause.
It's a Stalinesque "show me the man and i'll show you the crime" process

The SC had a mandate to look for Russian collusion and Russian interference, not business deal years before
Trump was a political figure

1) There was a GREAT DEAL MORE included in the Special Counsel's mandate than that**...and it appears that at no time has the SC exceeded his authority or mandate...or...

...2) You are totally full of shit.

You can choose one of those, Noise.

Or both...although I doubt you have the ethical wherewithal to do the right thing.

**
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.4
 
You bet your ass. They are a news AGGREGATOR. As long as they source correctly and have the link, they are reliable and VERIFIABLE. Unless you don't know how to click or Google. (Then you are stupid and don't belong any board, political or other).
you are sooo spun..
I go to Brietbart (rarely) at times but I know it's spin
 
1) There was a GREAT DEAL MORE included in the Special Counsel's mandate than that**...and it appears that at no time has the SC exceeded his authority or mandate...or...

...2) You are totally full of shit.

You can choose one of those, Noise.

Or both...although I doubt you have the ethical wherewithal to do the right thing.

**
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/600.4
gee Frank I never saw the mandate before :rolleyes: can you read what it says?

It's about 'Russian collusion "and matters related that may arise" -get it?
Things that were about da Russians of what comes up from an investigation.

It does not mean going back thru 2 or 3 tangental connects to Duetsh bank 10 years ago.
Theoretically if Mueller wanted to do that he would have to get authority from Rosenweasel.

But since special councils operate in the Stalinesque manner of :
"show me the man and i'll show you the crime". I grant you his powers are limitless/unfettered.
Which should worry you -but being a brain dead partisan I'd venture it doesn't
 
Last edited:
gee Frank I never saw the mandate before :rolleyes: can you read what it says?

It's about 'Russian collusion "and matters related that may arise" -get it?
Things that were about da Russians of what comes up from an investigation.

It does not mean going back thru 2 or 3 tangental connects to Duetsh bank 10 years ago.
Theoretically if Mueller wanted to do that he would have to get authority from Rosenweasel.

But since special councils operate in the Stalinesque manner of :
"show me the man and i'll show you the crime". I grant you his powers are limitless/unfettered.
Which should worry you -but being a brain dead partisan I'd venture it doesn't

Read the fucking thing, you asshole...and you will see that it gives the SC authority to do exactly what he has been doing. He has not violated the mandate in any way that we know of.

Trump is a fucking abomination. Whether he can be indicted for ANYTHING or not...he should not be the face of America on the world's stage. He should be under a rock someplace, not in the Oval Office. But he was elected president and he is the president.

Assholes like you want to protect him...like Cohen wanted to protect him.

Fine...do your best. The people who wanted to support Adolf Hitler did a fine job...I'm sure you people are as able as they.

In the meantime, if you make mistakes like you did, people like me will call them to your attention.

Okay?
 
Ex-Trump Insider: Donald Doesn’t Want to Be President ...


REUTERS/Mark Kauzlarich. In an open letter to voters supporting Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary, the former communications director of Trump’s now-defunct Super PAC said that the former reality television star not only never expected to be the Republican nominee, much less president, but never even wanted to be.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/03/28/Ex-Trump-Insider-Donald-Doesn-t-Want-Be-President

The Fiscal Times lol?

It’s odd that when I googled the Mark person’s name the only hit is some photographer on Instagram.

The link story is involves a Stephanie Cegielski person.

And buried in one of the last paragraphs is this tidbit:

“Cegielski, an attorney and the former vice president of public relations for the Public Relations Society of America, could be dismissed as a disgruntled former employee. The Trump campaign shut down the PAC that she worked for in October.”

Are you trying to Fake News me?
 
The Fiscal Times lol?

It’s odd that when I googled the Mark person’s name the only hit is some photographer on Instagram.

The link story is involves a Stephanie Cegielski person.

And buried in one of the last paragraphs is this tidbit:

“Cegielski, an attorney and the former vice president of public relations for the Public Relations Society of America, could be dismissed as a disgruntled former employee. The Trump campaign shut down the PAC that she worked for in October.”

Are you trying to Fake News me?

Everyone who has been in contact with Trump since the 1980s qualifies as a "disgruntled employee".
 
You bet your ass. They are a news AGGREGATOR. As long as they source correctly and have the link, they are reliable and VERIFIABLE. Unless you don't know how to click or Google. (Then you are stupid and don't belong any board, political or other).

Except when it has a link and is verifiable but says something you don't want to hear.

I belong anywhere I want to go until you're man enough to remove me. When do you plan to try or what excuse will you now make?
 
There's too much evidence that he never intended to win... Never dreamed of winning.

There's so much evidence that you lefties never thought he could win. When he did, because you weren't prepared, you've done nothing but whine and cry.
 
Stormy Daniels claims Trump 'didn't want to be president ...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/18/stormy-daniels-claims-trump-didnt...

Donald Trump didn't want to become president according to pornographic actress Stormy Daniels, writing in her memoir "Full Disclosure." According to U.K. newspaper the Guardian, which has seen a …

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/18/sto...p-didnt-want-to-be-president-in-her-book.html

So you trust someone whose only skill in life is to do what you likely do for free with the men, and maybe women, where you live?
 
Back
Top