Must Read Article for Leftists on Guns

Kobie said:
I don't give a fuck. Melt your kill-sticks down to slag and shoot the remnants into the fucking sun.

I don't care about calibers, scopes, stocks, barrels, anything. Your death toys have no place in a civilized society.

Fuck your hobby and fuck your guns and fuck you. You miserable sack of death.
Click to expand...

WELL, and there you have the liberal side of the firearm debate.

:facepalm:
 
Nordberg said:
On what fucking planet are you gun lovers getting your hunting weapons taken away? The right are such cry babies. The old redefine your weapons trick. Never gets old, does it,? I don't hunt. I don't give a shit if you do. If you find manly sport is shooting animals, have at it. But weapons of war, are not needed. Anti personal weapons , weapons of war ,should not be in the hands of the people. Many, many of them are nuts. You gun lovers all claim to be well trained and mentally fit. That is until the next mass shooting. Then he is your brand spanking new exception.
Click to expand...

30-Rounds.jpg
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
WELL, and there you have the liberal side of the firearm debate.

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

Yep. The left can lie about its commitment to "sensible gun control measures." They can lie—all day, every day—until they are blue in the face. They can lie in the press. They can lie in shows and films and books and podcasts. They can lie in seminars and webinars. They can lie from the rooftops, on the streets, in the trenches, and at the beach. Inevitably, someone always unwittingly admits that they really just want to ban firearms of every category. And we shall never surrender.
 
Nordberg said:
So you do not know how those happened. Waco was a setup. Koresh was doing some bad shit. The government set him up with illegal weapons charges and he did a real stupid thing. Did you get shot at Waco?

Ruby Ridge was about militia crazies defying the government. That does not work out so well. How long did it take before you recovered from that shooting. The militia response was the OKlahoma bombing. That actually killed innocent American citizens. That was worse.
Click to expand...

come back to us when you've learned the actual history, not the government worshiping talking points.
 
goldkam said:
The question is not if we should implement strict gun law policies in the US it is when the line is drawn. The line that so many gun enthusiasts, politicians, celebrities and average citizens fail to see. From a very mature perspective it seems absurd to not value safety and precaution, over rights and privilege. Yes a large number of people in the US value their 2nd Amendment and the ability to use and protect themselves through guns but what they fail to foresee is the value of example. The example that various countries throughout the world have demonstrated successfully, like Australia. You remove the risk, and in most cases the right, you increase the reward. The reward is quite simply the reduction of gun related violence, incidents and accidents. Australia has seen, since the removal of over 1 million guns, a reduction in homicides relating to guns and led to no mass shootings. Statistics don’t lie, unlike many Americans who continue to display arrogance and privilege. The right and privilege to do something is earned, exactly like respect, this works the same for guns. It has been proven that the guns laws, the right, the privilege, has not been earned but rather overrun. Yes, the argument is you remove guns then people will still try to access them. However the access will be significantly diminished, which in turn diminishes the reward.
Click to expand...

your elitist attitude is misplaced. it does not belong on your shoulders. especially when you purposefully taint the after experience of Australia. the only reward for law abiding people turning in their guns is now they have two masters. government and thugs, interchangeable at a moments notice.
 
Jade Dragon said:
Don't understand firearms? Don't be stupid, many liberals hunt, and own guns. My neighbors hunt often, including every Thanksgiving, and I can tell you they aren't conservatives. As for me I've watched Mythbusters, and tons of other stuff with guns, and have nothing against guns, within reason. Your BS is why you gun advocates on the right rarely add a damn thing to discussions about guns.
Click to expand...


I'm a Liberal and I'd love to be the first to show him how much I know about Guns ;)
 
Threedee said:
Yep. The left can lie about its commitment to "sensible gun control measures." They can lie—all day, every day—until they are blue in the face. They can lie in the press. They can lie in shows and films and books and podcasts. They can lie in seminars and webinars. They can lie from the rooftops, on the streets, in the trenches, and at the beach. Inevitably, someone always unwittingly admits that they really just want to ban firearms of every category. And we shall never surrender.
Click to expand...

Oh so some means all once again? So your a fucking Neo Nazi like the ones in Virginia than. We use guns people, I don't, I prefer swords, and can't stand the load noise. When are idiots on all sides going to stop deciding what people want based on fringe, some random person, or hearsay from biased sources. How the hell conervatives think they know what liberals want is beyond me. I wouldn't ban guns in a million years, but I would stop people that we know are threats from buying them, and take war weaponry off shelves. Face it even oodles of republicans want that as well. I mean Cruz was flagged, and was still considered fit to own war weaponry under our incompetent, and insanely selfish bullshit. Our crap is enough to make a saint, push their fingers into their eyes. Looks like I need a poll on this issue.
 
Jade Dragon said:
Oh so some means all once again? So your a fucking Neo Nazi like the ones in Virginia than. We use guns people, I don't, I prefer swords, and can't stand the load noise. When are idiots on all sides going to stop deciding what people want based on fringe, some random person, or hearsay from biased sources. How the hell conervatives think they know what liberals want is beyond me. I wouldn't ban guns in a million years, but I would stop people that we know are threats from buying them, and take war weaponry off shelves. Face it even oodles of republicans want that as well. I mean Cruz was flagged, and was still considered fit to own war weaponry under our incompetent, and insanely selfish bullshit. Our crap is enough to make a saint, push their fingers into their eyes. Looks like I need a poll on this issue.
Click to expand...

He represents more than not, and leftists who own guns are hypocrites.
 
Nordberg said:
The constitution was written in 1775. I don't think bump stocks, large cartridge magazines and anti personal weapons existed then. I suspect the founders were silent on them. So you guys are making that shit up to justify having weapons designed to kill lots of people in a short time. I think you people are sick.
Click to expand...

I think you mean it was written in 1788. They used .70 caliber balls in their muskets. Today, anything under .50 is banned. It doesn't matter what weapons the framers had in mind, they gave Congress the power to regulate weapons. Today some states ban assault weapons, some states require registration of all firearms, some require all gun show sales include background checks. So about any regulation can be passed regardless of whether the 2nd is an individual right or just applies to militias. Constitutional interpretation is not the issue--it is what regulations federal and state governments choose to impose.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
your elitist attitude is misplaced. it does not belong on your shoulders. especially when you purposefully taint the after experience of Australia. the only reward for law abiding people turning in their guns is now they have two masters. government and thugs, interchangeable at a moments notice.
Click to expand...


Please explain how so.....the United States has a gun problem. I am highlighting examples of other countries that have successfully demonstrated how firearm bans and stricter legislation can reduce gun violence and mass shootings. The statement I proposed is opinion driven supported by most countries and much of the USA with factual examples....how is this elitist attitude when over 50% of the United States support stricter gun legislation. You need to inform yourself of the definition of "elitist".

Taint???? I have spoken positively of Australia's after experience and through this demonstrated factual information, tainting is to "contaminate or pollute" or "effect with a bad or undesirable quality"

Please understand the meaning of your words before accusing me of tainting and being an elitist.

The government is the body which represents the USA on an international scale, implements legislation, overviews fiscal policy and sustains the USA. Without a government you have an anarchy, without a republic you have a tyranny. The government (call them what you want) is essential to society, whereby they balance both serving and managing society.

How are thugs gaining a reward???
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top