My new fav. for Biden's VP.

Just because you don't like the information doesn't make it a lie

hide your head in the sand, I prefer it

2016 REDUX baby

Just because you want something to be true, does not mean it is. Show us some proof of your wild allegation.... You cant.
 
I want the deepest deep state bench possible, to irritate the fuck out of them.
Make Vinman the head of the joint chiefs, and Hunter Biden for Veep. :mad:
Biden should start doing US policy now, open a charity and appropriate government money
to bankroll it by EO day one, and start tweeting out bribes to every country.

Fuck them raw and dry. :fu:

Hate to admit this but that actually made me chuckle.
 
She's just another black you idiots on the left think is qualified based on skin color. Didn't you learn you lesson with Obama by doing such things?

If we learned anything, it was that we were correct in our assessment that Obama was a highly qualified and competent candidate for President, no matter what color is skin was.

He proved that, by being an above average President and exponentially better than his stumble-bum predecessor, Bush.

The only idiots basing their assessment of Obama based on skin color are dumbass, hillbilly idiots like you.
 
I think you're looking at it from the same perspective that "typical guys" look at cheerleaders or models or Hooters waitresses.

I don't think politicians are judged according to the same rubric as members of the general population, especially at the highest levels.

Male Presidents are more expected to look youthful and vigorous, while looking young and shapely would be seen as more of a negative for a female because she would be seen as being less "serious".

Sort of a bimbo.

I fall back on the old adage that politics is Hollywood for ugly people. However there is truth in what you said. With such a small sample size of women at the President and VP level we don't have much data but if Abrams is selected for VP we'll find out if her weight issues are treated differently because she's a woman.
 
If we learned anything, it was that we were correct in our assessment that Obama was a highly qualified and competent candidate for President, no matter what color is skin was.

He proved that, by being an above average President and exponentially better than his stumble-bum predecessor, Bush.

The only idiots basing their assessment of Obama based on skin color are dumbass, hillbilly idiots like you.

You clearly didn't learn anything.

Your confusing ability with thinking skin color was a qualification. If Obama wasn't black, he wouldn't have been elected and you wouldn't be kissing his nigger ass.
 
You clearly didn't learn anything.

Your confusing ability with thinking skin color was a qualification. If Obama wasn't black, he wouldn't have been elected and you wouldn't be kissing his nigger ass.

I'm not confusing anything, peckerwood.

Trumptards like you are confusing ability with thinking that being an obnoxious asshole was a qualification.

If Trump wasn't the fucking low life pervert lunatic piece of shit he is, HE wouldn't have been elected and YOU wouldn't be kissing his fat pedo slob orange ass.

I voted for Obama because I was impressed with his superior intellect.

Intellect is a quality low-rent peckerwood trailer trash like you don't care anything about.

With you fuckers, the lower someone's intellect is the more you like them.
 
Lol, guess your internet sucks, because there is a giant youtube video on the screen.

Click on the Play arrow and the message: "Playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner." comes up.

Fucking dumbass.
 
Of course. I just fail to understand why everybody falls for the crap that comes from their side. I think it is just because they want to defend their side in order to win. It is ok if my team cheats if we win.

I'm sure if the Democrats had a candidate that had sex with a porn star and paid her off violating campaign finance laws, cheated on three wives, and grabbed women by the crotch the Republicans would yell that was a terrible person.

If the president was a Democrat and the Covid was killing 150,000 and the economy crashed the Democrats would be claiming the president was not responsible for things he could not control.

Unfortunately that is probably correct in many cases, & certainly on message boards....

They have one measure for their team, & another for the other team/s...........
 
If you've ever heard Stacey Abrams speak, she is highly gifted and competent. And the fact that she is a female and not a super hotsie totsie telebimbo will drive the right into a frothy crazed rage.

While that may all be true, what benefit is it to our country to just piss them off??

Isn't this just more division & no different~ & building upon that caused/brought about by trump & others??

While many trump fans feed off that-pissing off the left I think Biden is going to go in another direction-attempt to unite the country...........

Many forces out there will not want that to happen but the country will be stronger the more successful he is in doing so, IMHO..
 
Biden has a group of highly qualified and respected candidates who do not have to eat their principles to get the job. They are not like Pence who is a religious fanatic and a suckup. Pence had to table his religious values for 4 years. You know he was embarrassed by Trump and disagreed with him in his tiny religious heart. But he took it all. He sold out.
The Dems do not have to do that.

I would like to believe Pence is better than that, but his actions most often lead me to believe I'm probably wrong... Sadly like so many others, his beliefs have been trumped by his politics..

So the story goes: Poor Pence the martyr is sacrificing himself so that trump will enact God's will, like packing the courts aka THROUGH THE LAW!! Eventhough Jesus explicitly condemned those that used the law to lay burdens on the backs of others, they themselves were unwilling to carry.......

It is their failure in fulfilling what He commanded-the great commission, which they are attempting to overcompensate for via the law..

& that is even generous, as it assumes they have made an attempt to actually fulfill..........
 
Last edited:
I actually think it's the opposite. For me personally I exercise six days a week so I'm all about being in top shape. But men can argue I've got money, I eat well and therefore women still come to me so it's ok if I have a gut. There's always pressure on women to look good. Considering we've never had a woman President or VP there's no real precedent of course but I don't think generously proportioned women politicians get a break when most regular women wouldn't.

Would you consider M Thatcher & Merkel to be up to your standards??:thinking:
 
:thinking: Why, if I may ask?

Unlikable. Overly ambitious . Fake, not genuine. Sort of in the same way hrc was. I know, that's shallow. Plus there's no way I trust a dem from San Francisco. You know - that "San Francisco values" thing. Just being honest.
 
Back
Top