You better go check your facts. There has been fighting between the Sunnis and Shites since 2003 and it in fact is escalating.
Since when has Dixie ever let a few facts get in the way of his blustering crazy?
You better go check your facts. There has been fighting between the Sunnis and Shites since 2003 and it in fact is escalating.
Pipe down. You've been obliterated on this thread. You made the initial claim that the insurgents were mainly foreign fighters, which you haven't been able to support with any evidence whatsoever.
And you have split the hair that we weren't "at war with Iraq" for 10 years, just "at war." As thought that makes any difference to anyone, anywhere.
You pipe down, moron. I've not been obliterated in anything ever. I clearly stated the insurgency was comprised of former Saddam loyalists and radical Islamic terrorists. I did say that most of the radical Islamists were from outside of Iraq, and I haven't seen anything that disputes this. Also, it presents quite the dilemma for you, because if they aren't from outside of Iraq, it means radical Islamic terrorism existed in Iraq under Saddam, something you and Saddam vehemently denied.
I also split no hairs. I correctly stated that we were not fighting "Iraq" during the bulk of the past 10 years. You want it to be like Vietnam, and it's not. Sorry!
If you want to continue to claim that kumbaya singing, hand holding, peaceful, collaborative Jeffersonian democracy, planted by Dubya's army is now blossoming in Iraq, you are free to do so... Just realize your fantasy vision is not shared by many many people, most of whom have forgotten more about the middle east since breakfast this morning than you have ever known.
You better go check your facts. There has been fighting between the Sunnis and Shites since 2003 and it in fact is escalating.
If what's going on now in Iraq isn't civil war, then I'm straight.
Where the hell does Dixie come up wi h this shit?
You better go check your facts. There has been fighting between the Sunnis and Shites since 2003 and it in fact is escalating.
show us where it has been escalating in the past several years.
show us where it has been escalating in the past several years.
War is war, doofus. Iraq was 10 years of hell, for the country & for the soldiers fighting it. All it does is support the contention that war is impossibly unpredictable, which is why it's a last resort, and not the cowboy option that you tend to prefer.
So yeah - you split hairs. I fail to see how it changes the nature of what we got into over there, recklessly & needlessly.
War is war... WOW... what a brilliant thing to come up with, did you do that by yourself, Lummox?
Iraq was NOT 10 years of hell, I have relatives who were there. I was there as a contractor. Iraq may have been 6-8 months of hell, while we battled resistance from insurgent strongholds in Fallujah and elsewhere, but that was part of establishing western style democracy in the Arab world. North Korea isn't the Arab world, and western style democracy exists right across the border in South Korea. I didn't suggest we try to establish a western style democracy in North Korea, I just said we should take out the North Korean tyrant, and let the chips fall where they may.
We have a bit of a problem with your comprehension, you seem to want to believe "last resort" means NEVER EVER! We have tried diplomacy with North Korea, for 60 years. We have tried paying off North Korea, we have tried sanctions, we have tried negotiation, we have tried to pressure China, we have literally done everything we can think of, and still they threaten to nuke our allies. Our "last resort" simply can not come AFTER they have followed through with this threat! YES... War is Hell! YES... War is unpredictable! But America is still in a declared state of war with North Korea.
In how to deal with this problem, I take you back to your initial post to me, where you came up with the idea of preemptive invasion all on your own, before anyone ever mentioned it. And I told you why, it's because you KNOW this is the only solution that will work to end this problem. I haven't argued that we should invade or try to establish democracy, I said we should turn them into a grease spot if they fail to disarm. You have NO solution, except to follow John Kerry around with your nose up his ass, trying yet another round of economic sanctions which won't work.
No - I came up w/ the idea of pre-emptive invasion because it's how YOU think, Bush toadie. My post was sarcastic, because you were clearly implying that you advocate Iraq II for NK.
And NK isn't a threat to the U.S. Bluster isn't a reason for thousands if not hundreds of thousands to die.
That is 100% pure conjecture. Your conclusions aren't supported by the claims you make above - not one iota.
You can't back up your initial claim. You have nothing to go on for that. Your "well, MOST of the people sure seemed happy, so it couldn't have been THEM" argument is laughable.
No - I came up w/ the idea of pre-emptive invasion because it's how YOU think, Bush toadie. My post was sarcastic, because you were clearly implying that you advocate Iraq II for NK.
And NK isn't a threat to the U.S. Bluster isn't a reason for thousands if not hundreds of thousands to die.
You pipe down, moron. I've not been obliterated in anything ever. I clearly stated the insurgency was comprised of former Saddam loyalists and radical Islamic terrorists. I did say that most of the radical Islamists were from outside of Iraq, and I haven't seen anything that disputes this. Also, it presents quite the dilemma for you, because if they aren't from outside of Iraq, it means radical Islamic terrorism existed in Iraq under Saddam, something you and Saddam vehemently denied.
I also split no hairs. I correctly stated that we were not fighting "Iraq" during the bulk of the past 10 years. You want it to be like Vietnam, and it's not. Sorry!
Remember when you said Iraq had WMD... You were obliterated on that one.