nano Thermite found in all 911 dust samples

WHAT ???

:eek:

... wow

these people are ignorant

actually, he's got a point.

how many people believed the 90% of guns in mexican drug cartels originated from the US? Then it was proven to be totally false, even an outright lie and yet we still have democrat shills like Hitlery Clinton still spouting the bullshit lie?
 
actually, he's got a point.

how many people believed the 90% of guns in mexican drug cartels originated from the US? Then it was proven to be totally false, even an outright lie and yet we still have democrat shills like Hitlery Clinton still spouting the bullshit lie?

I've been waiting for one of the proponets of this 90% to re-raise this issue, on one of "gun" threads.
Odd how they ran away from this information.
 
:lmao:

What a bunch of lemmings.

Thank you to everybody who has chimed in with their opinion of me .. but didn't have a motherfucking thing to offer about the point of this thread that they didn't pull out of their ass.

Wow, let's all avoid the question of why thermite was found in ALL samples in ALL three buildings .. and we don't have a fucking clue why the site remained hot for weeks after the event, something fire could not do but thermite certainly could .. instead, let's talk about BAC and Desh .. even though we don't have a fucking clue.

Let's talk about UFO's and global warming and the Bermuda Triangle and conspiracy theorists .. amd even though not a single one of us can answer any questions, let's all say we "pwned" BAC and Desh anyway so we stay consistent with the rest of our 8th grade comments. After all, we're just a bunch of dummies so what do we know about the laws of physics.

We "pwned" BAC and Desh.

What an intelligent group, most of whom just knew Saddam had WMD.

It is no mystery at all why we ended up in Iraq or why we've dumped trillions of dollars on corporate thieves. Americans are an invented people who are easily led by the nose.

:)

... amazing

LMAO.... what an idiot... Tell you what... I'll post this again, you'll ignore it again, then you will come back on here telling us how no one addresses your idiotic points.

http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm

Let me guess, rather than address anything in this you will instead attack the source again? Because all your 'knowledge' says this cannot be the case.
 
Let me guess, rather than address anything in this you will instead attack the source again? Because all your 'knowledge' says this cannot be the case.


I saw your link, but didn't find anything faux news couldn't have provided. Comprehensive!!
You've obviously done your homework with a critical eye, idiot
 
Why would they use a ridiculous pyrotechnic explosive like thermite?

The mere thought is absurd.

I get it now. They ran planes into the towers to cover up the fact that they were using a ridiculous explosive like thermite to destroy them (instead of, say, blaming the explosions themselves on terrorists).
 
Why would they use a ridiculous pyrotechnic explosive like thermite?

The mere thought is absurd.

I get it now. They ran planes into the towers to cover up the fact that they were using a ridiculous explosive like thermite to destroy them (instead of, say, blaming the explosions themselves on terrorists).

close. they used the terrorist paradigm to coverup a false flag operation designed to bring the country into a war so they and fellow cronies could profit from the war machine among other things.

But you're trying so hard.
 
Watermarx loves the military industrial complex. It's sad seeing standard libs transform into real actual totalitarians. I guess they're the ones they've been waiting for. How special.
 
actually, he's got a point.

how many people believed the 90% of guns in mexican drug cartels originated from the US? Then it was proven to be totally false, even an outright lie and yet we still have democrat shills like Hitlery Clinton still spouting the bullshit lie?

So find a test you think failed then apply it to science and say all tests fail.

.. amazing.

OK, I'll play ...

Here's a question that NONE of the fairy=tale believers, including you, have an answer for.

Why did the site stay hot for weeks after the event and how did it become the longest burning site in history (another first) when there is no doubt that fire, nor jet fuel/kerosene, nor airplanes, nor burning insulation, could have possibly caused either to happen?

Let's see if any of you can stop hiding behind each other and step up and answer the question in a straightforward manner.
 
Why would they use a ridiculous pyrotechnic explosive like thermite?

The mere thought is absurd.

I get it now. They ran planes into the towers to cover up the fact that they were using a ridiculous explosive like thermite to destroy them (instead of, say, blaming the explosions themselves on terrorists).

Why was thermite found in ALL samples?

Why did the site stay hot for weeks after the event and how did it become the longest burning site in history (another first) when there is no doubt that fire, nor jet fuel/kerosene, nor airplanes, nor burning insulation, could have possibly caused either to happen?

Why did the Bush Administration remove critical evidence from the crime scenes? (Confirmed by the 9/11 Commission)

If the attack of the WTC is to be believed as told, why was there such relatively little interior and exterior damage at the Pentagon that left little evidence of a large plane crash, only made a small hole, couldn't burn paper, wood, or plastic right next to the crash site, the roof didn't even collapse until half and hour after the impact, no real pictures of the attack even though the Pentagon is set up to take such pictures and no pictures from the confiscated camera from right across the street, with the so-called "hijacker" taking the most difficult path to the Pentagon possible which actuall avoided the more critical and much more easily accessible areas, and with the plane executing an impossible route almost inches off the ground .. by so-called pilots who didn't have enough flying skills to rent a Cessna and two of whom lived with an FBI informant for two years?

Please save the hyperbole and "patriotic" responses and answer the question in a straightforward courtroom manner, if you please.
 
LMAO.... what an idiot... Tell you what... I'll post this again, you'll ignore it again, then you will come back on here telling us how no one addresses your idiotic points.

http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm

Let me guess, rather than address anything in this you will instead attack the source again? Because all your 'knowledge' says this cannot be the case.

This is from the very same site that used to profess there was no thermite at any of the buildings and that Jones was just a glory-hound.

Nothing on this site addresses the questions I asked .. and it's more than a bit curious that it didn't address the most obvious question of why thermite was even there. How did they miss that?

Throughout this thread I have attacked the evidence, not the source .. which I leave to your side of the political divide.

Question, if I post the rebuttal to that site, and there are many rebuttals, will you believe what I post?

NO, you won't.

How do FOUR guys who can't fly a Cessna and can barely drive a car jump into the cockpits of very large aircraft with complicated systems and fly them with perfection and execute flight manuevers that combat pilots couldn't do?

Let me take a guess .. you don't fucking know .. nor do you know the answers to hundrds of sane questions about the fairy-tale.

All you know is that no one has a right to question our goverment .. even though we have a history of subterfuge into war .. and even though the Bush Administration has proven to be the most corrupt and deceptive administration in our history.

By all means, don't let any of that get in the way of your belief system.
 
Last edited:
"This is from the very same site that used to profess there was no thermite at any of the buildings and that Jones was just a glory-hound."

Like I said, you attack the site and source and not the actual information provided because it goes against your fantasy.

"Nothing on this site addresses the questions I asked .. and it's more than a bit curious that it didn't address the most obvious question of why thermite was even there. How did they miss that?"

Yes, it does. You simply refuse to read it. Or you read it and dismiss it because it contradicts your fantasy.

"Throughout this thread I have attacked the evidence, not the source .. which I leave to your side of the political divide."

ROFLMAO.... fucking comical.... seriously... this from the man whose FIRST sentence on THIS post attacked the SITE.

"Question, if I post the rebuttal to that site, and there are many rebuttals, will you believe what I post?"

Unlike you, I am willing to read and educate myself. But if it is more of Jones like 'well here is a photo and this proves what I am saying' then yes I will be skeptical. If it goes through and explains how they got enough thermite in the building to do what you and Jones claim without anyone noticing.... then I would be happy to read it. As I said, there are some things with regards to 9/11 that need to be explained. But at this point, the 'they brought down the buildings with explosives' is not one of them.


"How do FOUR guys who can't fly a Cessna and can barely drive a car jump into the cockpits of very large aircraft with complicated systems and fly them with perfection and execute flight manuevers that combat pilots couldn't do?"

Again with your bullshit. First, a cessna and a 767 have different flight control systems. Second, from the combat pilots I know (my cousin being one) he says the claim that they couldn't fly it ridiculous. ESPECIALLY for the two that hit the towers. He did say the Pentagon plane would take a far greater degree of control given the proximity to the ground. To which he added... was probably why the reports from eyewitnesses said the planes wings were flopping around. But this does go back to my point that you like to keep bouncing from one site to the next.... first talking about thermite in dust, then about the Pentagon plane, next you will be pretending again that the structures of buildings in Spain are designed just like the WTC buildings and Pentagon again.

"Let me take a guess .. you don't fucking know .. nor do you know the answers to hundrds of sane questions about the fairy-tale."

Do I 'know' for sure... no, because I am not a pilot. So I asked the pilots I know and take their word for it.

"All you know is that no one has a right to question our goverment .. even though we have a history of subterfuge into war .."

ahhh yes, the other strawman you love so much.... For the final fucking time moron... I have NEVER stated that you shouldn't question the government. NOT ONCE. That is simply your fallback strawman when you realize that yet again you have not addressed one fucking point from the link I provided. You instead attack the site and ignore the data. Just as I stated you would. Thank you for proving me correct yet again.

and even though the Bush Administration has proven to be the most corrupt and deceptive administration in our history.

By all means, don't let any of that get in the way of your belief system.

One day perhaps you will be able to remove your blinders and see the whole picture. But with regards to this subject that seems unlikely. Your mind is already set.... and you refuse to read or acknowledge anything that may disrupt your fantasy.
 
One day perhaps you will be able to remove your blinders and see the whole picture. But with regards to this subject that seems unlikely. Your mind is already set.... and you refuse to read or acknowledge anything that may disrupt your fantasy.

:)

Wow

Real combat pilots who disagree with your cousin ..
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/core

Where in your article does it state where the thermite came from or why it was found in ALL samples?

Where in the article does it state why the site stayed hot for so long?

It's a long article so if I missed it, tell me where it is.
 
BAC, these Castrati Nutless homo males are too busy being on big brother's pole to think things through, you know that.

:)

We're more than 2,000 views into this thread with over 300 comments .. YET, not one single fairy-tale believer has answered the question of why thermite was present in all three buildings or why the site stayed hot so long when ONLY a thermire reaction could produce.

Not a single one of them.
 
Last edited:
:)

We're more than 2,000 views into this thread with over 300 comments .. YET, not one single fairy-tale believer has answered the question of why thermite was present in all three buildings or why the site stayed hot so long when ONLY a thermire reaction could produce.

Not a single one of them.
*sigh*

It's been answered myriad times. You just keep repeating it hasn't.

http://www.ehponline.org/members/2002/110p703-714lioy/EHP110p703PDF.PDF

Pg. 709 of the report, please read it.

it says:

"The levels of many of the elements are consistent with their presence in building materials, including chromium, magnesium, manganese, aluminum, and barium."


And the zinc? Galvanized zinc coating covered roughly 150 acres of corrugated steel floor decking in the towers. Red oxide zinc chromate primer paint was used on the structural steel, and many of the aircraft components were coated with zinc corrosion protection. Zinc also constitutes 10-40% of the content of brass, and a significant portion of bronze and nickel, and is used in many other construction and mechanical applications.

So, why did the elements exist in the dust samples? Well, because they existed in the building all the time, but were not thermite.

The reports that Jones uses, and other theorists, to suggest that the dust carried more than a normal amount is baseless.

There is no evidence that there was the presence of thermite at the scene before the cleanup crew showed up and used it to cut columns at an angle. Saying that it was there because of these reports of dust studies is ridiculous, the very study that they cite states that it was not surprising and the elements were at the levels expected.
 
*sigh*

It's been answered myriad times. You just keep repeating it hasn't.

http://www.ehponline.org/members/2002/110p703-714lioy/EHP110p703PDF.PDF

Pg. 709 of the report, please read it.

it says:




And the zinc? Galvanized zinc coating covered roughly 150 acres of corrugated steel floor decking in the towers. Red oxide zinc chromate primer paint was used on the structural steel, and many of the aircraft components were coated with zinc corrosion protection. Zinc also constitutes 10-40% of the content of brass, and a significant portion of bronze and nickel, and is used in many other construction and mechanical applications.

So, why did the elements exist in the dust samples? Well, because they existed in the building all the time, but were not thermite.

The reports that Jones uses, and other theorists, to suggest that the dust carried more than a normal amount is baseless.

There is no evidence that there was the presence of thermite at the scene before the cleanup crew showed up and used it to cut columns at an angle. Saying that it was there because of these reports of dust studies is ridiculous, the very study that they cite states that it was not surprising and the elements were at the levels expected.

nano thermite is everywhere!!
 
nano thermite is everywhere!!
The elements that create thermite are very common and finding them in dust samples is not surprising. Again, the report they cite themselves to come up with this particular gem states that the amount was consistent with what they would find at any construction site based on the commonality of the elements.

Of course those lines are taken out of whatever internet page they put it on, but heck, it is a HUGE report. I only linked to 12 or so pages of it with my link above, but it was the part about the dust samples.

And before people get into the diphenylpropane, that is produced when the plastics from computers melt and/or burn. It does not suggest the presence of thermite either.

It simply isn't in evidence that there was thermite at the site before workers came to clean it up.

Ignoring other sourcing for the trace elements found in the dust doesn't make what you want to be true into the truth.
 
:)

We're more than 2,000 views into this thread with over 300 comments .. YET, not one single fairy-tale believer has answered the question of why thermite was present in all three buildings or why the site stayed hot so long when ONLY a thermire reaction could produce.

Not a single one of them.

Post 4.

:) :) :) :) :) :) :)
 
Back
Top