Nattering Nancy II

Looks like Trump and Melania have one as well.

Hmm, do you think that the RWNJs think of Melania as "weak" because she's tolerated Trump's wee-weenie adventures?

A MAJOR difference is Hillary is portrayed as this leading feminist. So her not only standing by her man (who basically humiliated her) but attacking the women isn't exactly what one pictures when they think leading feminist.
 
There are many who suggest that Bill Clinton would be nowhere without Hillary.

She is a strong woman.

There are many that spout bullshit. She is weak. How else could you explain her inability to accept personal responsibility. Or her inability to concede the night of the election?
 
Bullshit. I post under an alias because guys like you get mad when I tell the truth.

You post under an alias because you have no guts.

Back just a few years, when you wanted your voice to be heard on the issues of the day, you wrote a letter-to-the-editor. No decent newspaper in the country would publish your letter without your name and town. I've written hundreds of LTE's and dozens of op ed pieces for newspapers and magazines...always with my name attached.

Show some guts...some strength...and THEN talk about Hillary Clinton's lack of it.

Or...continue with your pathetic charade...and claims that you are spineless because other people get mad!

 
There are many that spout bullshit. She is weak. How else could you explain her inability to accept personal responsibility. Or her inability to concede the night of the election?

She is a lot stronger than you...although I doubt you will work up the integrity to "concede" that.
 
You post under an alias because you have no guts.

Back just a few years, when you wanted your voice to be heard on the issues of the day, you wrote a letter-to-the-editor. No decent newspaper in the country would publish your letter without your name and town. I've written hundreds of LTE's and dozens of op ed pieces for newspapers and magazines...always with my name attached.

Show some guts...some strength...and THEN talk about Hillary Clinton's lack of it.

Or...continue with your pathetic charade...and claims that you are spineless because other people get mad!


People get fired for their political opinion. I wrote a letter to editor years ago and it still shows up when you google my name. I wrote nothing offensive or that controversial but I regret the hell out of doing it. People use stuff like that against you.
 
You post under an alias because you have no guts.

Back just a few years, when you wanted your voice to be heard on the issues of the day, you wrote a letter-to-the-editor. No decent newspaper in the country would publish your letter without your name and town. I've written hundreds of LTE's and dozens of op ed pieces for newspapers and magazines...always with my name attached.

Show some guts...some strength...and THEN talk about Hillary Clinton's lack of it.

Or...continue with your pathetic charade...and claims that you are spineless because other people get mad!


I have written several LTEs, and I comment to my local liberal rag's FB page using my real name. So that blows your accusation right there.

You give a perfect example of why I don't use my RN on this forum. I don't see you whining to your fellow liberals that they don't use their real names. LOL
 
She is a lot stronger than you...although I doubt you will work up the integrity to "concede" that.

I see no rebuttal from you on the points that I just made, just a repetition of your opinion. Try again?

She is weak. How else could you explain her inability to accept personal responsibility. Or her inability to concede the night of the election?
 
People get fired for their political opinion. I wrote a letter to editor years ago and it still shows up when you google my name. I wrote nothing offensive or that controversial but I regret the hell out of doing it. People use stuff like that against you.

Indeed...and I understand.

But this "Right" is calling someone else weak...

...and I am just telling him (if it is a him) that he is showing more weakness than Hillary.
 
Indeed...and I understand.

But this "Right" is calling someone else weak...

...and I am just telling him (if it is a him) that he is showing more weakness than Hillary.

You are incorrectly equating an expectation of privacy for weakness, and equating desire for public recognition for strength.
 
I have written several LTEs, and I comment to my local liberal rag's FB page using my real name. So that blows your accusation right there.

No it doesn't. I am talking about you calling someone else "weak" HERE...IN THIS FORUM...while showing weakness.

You give a perfect example of why I don't use my RN on this forum. I don't see you whining to your fellow liberals that they don't use their real names. LOL

Yeah, sure.

Continue with you weakness...but expect to be called on it when you call someone else weak.

And as for whining...you are doing most of it here.

Me...I'm having a bit of fun.
 
You are incorrectly equating an expectation of privacy for weakness, and equating desire for public recognition for strength.

You are incorrectly equating being rude and inappropriate for being out-spoken.

Grow up.
 
No it doesn't. I am talking about you calling someone else "weak" HERE...IN THIS FORUM...while showing weakness.



Yeah, sure.

Continue with you weakness...but expect to be called on it when you call someone else weak.

And as for whining...you are doing most of it here.

Me...I'm having a bit of fun.

No, your just proving how inept you are at logic.
 
How ironic.

What is "ironic"...is someone like you calling anyone else "weak."

That is IRONY!

Hillary Clinton is an intelligent, strong woman. Apparently she threatens you. Try to stay calm. She is out of the picture for now.
 
What is "ironic"...is someone like you calling anyone else "weak."

That is IRONY!

Hillary Clinton is an intelligent, strong woman. Apparently she threatens you. Try to stay calm. She is out of the picture for now.

Again I see no rebuttal from you on the points that I just made, just a repetition of your opinion. Try again?
 
Again I see no rebuttal from you on the points that I just made, just a repetition of your opinion. Try again?

The only point you are making clear, Right...is the one on top of your head.

The Internet forum...IS PREDOMINATELY ABOUT SHARING OPINIONS.

If you think the forum was set up so that you ask and others answer...that is just one more mistake you are making.
 
You don't realize that you made several logical fallacies? :rofl2:

I don't think so...but if you point out a VALID logical fallacy, I will acknowledge it.

I doubt you have the personal integrity to ever acknowledge any mistakes.
 
Back
Top