Natural rights and libertarianism

If you don't know the difference between an individual starving and the children of an individual starving I don't see how we can discuss anything.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piEsCIKixtE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piEsCIKixtE[/ame]
 
and yet, if it comes down to actual survival, many species commit infanticide.

Yes, during times of famine they may commit infanticide, however, is it simply so they can survive or do they realize their offspring will ultimately starve to death along with themselves resulting in an extinction of the species?
 
Yes, during times of famine they may commit infanticide, however, is it simply so they can survive or do they realize their offspring will ultimately starve to death along with themselves resulting in an extinction of the species?

It is so they can survive. Do you honestly believe that animals are thinking about the continuation of the species? It may well serve an evolutionary function, but that is not what motivates the animal.
 
It's not hair splitting.

Here's an example of the difference. It is not unusual for a woman to remain in a relationship and suffer abuse, for years, but leave if the man starts to abuse the children.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXRH50fvHWA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXRH50fvHWA[/ame]
 
That would be between him and NASA. He does not have the right to use the capital or materials provided by NASA.

So you have a right to the fruits of your labor if you own the means of production. But then how do you own the means of production?
 
Back
Top