SmarterthanYou
rebel
I can't remember it right now, but it referred to communist philosophy i believe about to every man his needs, or production. something to that effect. anyone?
You know, that's actually quite interesting. Marx's concept seems to parallel ideas about post-scarcity.
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." -- Karl MarxI can't remember it right now, but it referred to communist philosophy i believe about to every man his needs, or production. something to that effect. anyone?
Now wait a second. Isn't this the same guy who failed his senior research thesis on "How to tie your own shoe" because he was wearing penny loafers?Watermark is more Libertarian than anyone I have ever met. His disguise is truly a masterpiece of intellectual design.
No, that was you Mott. Or at least it would be if Ohio actually had some sort of learning institution that taught something other than football.Now wait a second. Isn't this the same guy who failed his senior research thesis on "How to tie your own shoe" because he was wearing penny loafers?
Billy....you're talking about a guy who has to eat pudding with a plastic spoon so he won't punch his eye out by accident!No, that was you Mott. Or at least it would be if Ohio actually had some sort of learning institution that taught something other than football.
....Mott, you don't punch things with spoons. You use your hands to punch.Billy....you're talking about a guy who has to eat pudding with a plastic spoon so he won't punch his eye out by accident!
i like you watermark...but you often just parrot your professor speak
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." -- Karl Marx
Marx more than likely took it from the Bible.
wikipedia said:The phrase has its origin in the New Testament. In the parable of the Kingdom of Heaven, Jesus spoke of what we are given, according to our abilities; to test the commitment of the steward to his master. In Acts the Apostles lifestyle is described as communal (without individual possession), and uses the phrase "distribution was made unto every man according as he had need"[6]:
“ Matthew 25:15 And to one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to each according to his ability. And he went abroad at once.
Acts 2:45 And they sold their possessions and goods and distributed them to all, according as anyone had need.
Acts 4:32-35 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
Actually, she's wrong and you're a liar.Actually you're right:
Matthew 25:
14 “Again, it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants and entrusted his wealth to them. 15 To one he gave five bags of gold, to another two bags, and to another one bag,[a] each according to his ability. Then he went on his journey. 16 The man who had received five bags of gold went at once and put his money to work and gained five bags more. 17 So also, the one with two bags of gold gained two more. 18 But the man who had received one bag went off, dug a hole in the ground and hid his master’s money.
19 “After a long time the master of those servants returned and settled accounts with them. 20 The man who had received five bags of gold brought the other five. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with five bags of gold. See, I have gained five more.’
21 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’
22 “The man with two bags of gold also came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘you entrusted me with two bags of gold; see, I have gained two more.’
23 “His master replied, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things; I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master’s happiness!’
24 “Then the man who had received one bag of gold came. ‘Master,’ he said, ‘I knew that you are a hard man, harvesting where you have not sown and gathering where you have not scattered seed. 25 So I was afraid and went out and hid your gold in the ground. See, here is what belongs to you.’
26 “His master replied, ‘You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? 27 Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.
28 “‘So take the bag of gold from him and give it to the one who has ten bags. 29 For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 30 And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
Actually, she's wrong and you're a liar.
The parable teaches the exact opposite of Marx.
Apparently you got the quote from wikipedia, and it was obviously re-worded to make it look like it reinforced Marxist philosophy. So either you knew it was a lie or are woefully uneducated in the basic tenets of the Bible, so are unqualified to comment on same.Mathew 25, Acts 2:45, and Acts 2:32-35 is clearly where he got the quote. Can you show some evidence that this is not where he derived this phrase?
The meaning of the parable is irrelevant to this discussion. Marx clearly wasn't a Christian.
Apparently you got the quote from wikipedia, and it was obviously re-worded to make it look like it reinforced Marxist philosophy.
So either you knew it was a lie
or are woefully uneducated in the basic tenets of the Bible,