New C.D.C. Director Resists Ouster as Other Officials Resign

[Walt]

I think you are trying to double down on a lie about the availability of the vaccine.

I think you are lying about my wife. A better man would have apologized by now about that.

Fuck you and your little bitch's statement that I actively work towards the sexual abuse of children.

 

[Scott]

No, RFK Jr. is doing the opposite, slowly restoring confidence in an institution that's been beset by corruption.

LOL

Only among the cultists. The scientists know he’s a fucking idiot.

Personal attacks tend to kill threads. If that's your game, you're on the right track. If, on the other hand, you are actually looking to debate a point and perhaps even try to understand why some disagree with you, you'd ask why questions, such as why your ideological opponent believes x or y thing (without adding insults which tends to inflame and/or silence actual discussions).

 

[Scott]

I don't know about that. Already, he's made some steps that I think that have been quite solid.

I think we can agree that what this all comes down to is what RFK Jr. is doing. I think he's doing things that are good, you don't. If this conversation's going to go anywhere, we've got to get into specific decisions he's made and why we disagree on whether those decisions were good or bad.

Why don’t you read the resignation letter of that vaccine chief? He is pretty specific.

If you think he had something important to say, by all means quote him.

 

[Scott]

I think you are lying about my wife. A better man would have apologized by now about that.

I read through your posts with Dam. I almost thought of not saying anything at all, as the argument seems to center around whether or not covid vaccines are available in some places and you know what I think of vaccines, full stop. But what got to me is that both of you seem to have fallen into the trap of assuming things for which I've seen no evidence for, namely that both of you are lying. I've seen no evidence of that. What I -suspect- is that both of you have jumped to that conclusion.

Fuck you and your little bitch's statement that I actively work towards the sexual abuse of children.

I strongly suspect that more jumping to conclusions has occurred here.

 

[domer76]

View attachment 58014

Personal attacks tend to kill threads. If that's your game, you're on the right track. If, on the other hand, you are actually looking to debate a point and perhaps even try to understand why some disagree with you, you'd ask why questions, such as why your ideological opponent believes x or y thing (without adding insults which tends to inflame and/or silence actual discussions).

Could you not read? Only Trump’s cultists think he’s doing a good job. The actual scientists are jumping ship and protesting as much as they can given the risk of being fired.

 

[Scott]

Could you not read?

Already with an insult -.-

Only Trump’s cultists [snip]

I think it's clear at this point that you're not looking to understand those who disagree with you here, only to insult them.

 

[domer76]

If you think he had something important to say, by all means quote him.

It’s public info for everybody to read. But since you’re so fucking lazy to look it up for yourself, here’s the link.

Read the Resignation Letters of Top CDC Officials

Their words capture an unprecedented, historic, and dramatic moment in the agency's history

www.medpagetoday.com

 

[domer76]

Already with an insult -.-



I think it's clear at this point that you're not looking to understand those who disagree with you here, only to insult them.

You can’t disagree with facts, cultist. You can only ignore. You do that quite well.

 

[Scott]

Why don’t you read the resignation letter of that vaccine chief? He is pretty specific.

If you think he had something important to say, by all means quote him.

It’s public info for everybody to read.

Well then, you should have no problem quoting him.

But since you’re so fucking lazy [snip]

Alright, again, I can see where this is going. When you want to actually discuss something with me, try to refrain from the personal attacks.

 

[Nordberg]

Trying.....we are nowhere yet.

When the illness death count rises, you will have to blame Biden. You will. RFK is a disaster.

 

[Scott]

RFK is a disaster.

For Big Pharma, certainly.

 

[domer76]

Well then, you should have no problem quoting him.



Alright, again, I can see where this is going. When you want to actually discuss something with me, try to refrain from the personal attacks.

Deal. In exchange, try to refrain from posting lies and bullshit. Then we can proceed.

 

[Scott]

It’s public info for everybody to read. But since you’re so fucking lazy [snip]

Alright, again, I can see where this is going. When you want to actually discuss something with me, try to refrain from the personal attacks.

Deal.

For one brief moment in time, I thought we might actually have a decent conversation. But then...

In exchange, try to refrain from posting lies and bullshit.

Ah well. Perhaps next time, you can go for more than a word or 2 before falling into the insult cycle once more.

 

[domer76]

For one brief moment in time, I thought we might actually have a decent conversation. But then...



Ah well. Perhaps next time, you can go for more than a word or 2 before falling into the insult cycle once more.

As I said, refrain from the garbage and we can move forward. CDC is in a shambles. That’s what you get when you have amateur conspiracists in charge.

 

[Scott]

For one brief moment in time, I thought we might actually have a decent conversation. But then...

Ah well. Perhaps next time, you can go for more than a word or 2 before falling into the insult cycle once more.

As I said, refrain from the...

With you so far...

...garbage

Ah, so close . One day, I think you'll manage to get in a full sentence without an insult when it comes to this subject.

 

[domer76]

With you so far...



Ah, so close . One day, I think you'll manage to get in a full sentence without an insult when it comes to this subject.

Want to see part of the letter on your well-run agency?

“am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health.”

I’ll continue if you wish to discuss that.

 

[zymurgy]

we still pretending no deep state exists as unelected bureaucrats cling to positions of power and authority?

 

[domer76]

Well then, you should have no problem quoting him.



Alright, again, I can see where this is going. When you want to actually discuss something with me, try to refrain from the personal attacks.

“Having worked in local and national public health for years, I have never experienced such radical non-transparency, nor have I seen such unskilled manipulation of data to achieve a political end rather than the good of the American people.”

Did you need more?

 

[domer76]

we still pretending no deep state exists as unelected bureaucrats cling to positions of power and authority?

The people at CDC are dedicated scientists just trying to do their best to protect public health. They are some of the best scientists in the world and could give a shit about power and authority. That’s for the politicians.

 

[zymurgy]

The people at CDC are dedicated scientists just trying to do their best to protect public health. They are some of the best scientists in the world and could give a shit about power and authority. That’s for the politicians.

her argument for why she can't be fired was entirely political dipshit - and her initial approval for this role was completely partsian as well.

funny how now the democrats care for her