New Year Predictions Thread. Post them here, we'll read them on December 31st!

Jack said:
Translation: We couldn't get Bill on anything so we quizzed everybody about their sex life. And, gosh darn it, we found Bill getting a blow job ... by no less than ... a girl.
"BAM! We finally got this son-of-a-bitch!" (inner workings of pea sized brain of USF)
Click to expand...

He probably should have told the truth, when under oath. :good4u:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
He probably should have told the truth, when under oath. :good4u:
Click to expand...

Which is more Honorable in YOUR mind:

Protecting your wife and child from embarrassment and humiliation at the hands of the religious Guttersnots, or telling these hypicritical, window-peeking, political idealogues the truth?
 
Jack said:
Which is more Honorable in YOUR mind:

Protecting your wife and child from embarrassment and humiliation at the hands of the religious Guttersnots, or telling these hypicritical, window-peeking, political idealogues the truth?
Click to expand...

He wasn't protecting his wife and child, he was trying to cover his ass; because the allegations (which were proved to be true) had been around way before he became President; unless you're trying to say Hillary and Chelsea were totally unware of this, prior to the investigation.
 
Jack said:
I would think it would depend on what comes up.
If it comes down to Trump using campaign money to pay off a Porn Star over a sexual affair, I doubt most people would consider this as an Impeachable Offense, even though it might be illegal.
Money Laundering ... that might be viewed differently. Using the Office of President as a way to generate 'business deals' or make money for the Trump Organization might be viewed as an Impeachable Offense.
Flynn working for the Turks, Manafort working for the Russians. This raises some Red Flags. I have no problem seeing what turns up.
Click to expand...

Of course you don't, you're a leftist. You and your ilk have a penchant for Soviet style police state tactics. In this country, we are not supposed to investigate people, "and see what turns up". We investigate crimes. If there is no predicate crime, there shouldn't be an investigation.
 
countryboy said:
Of course you don't, you're a leftist. You and your ilk have a penchant for Soviet style police state tactics. In this country, we are not supposed to investigate people, "and see what turns up". We investigate crimes. If there is no predicate crime, there shouldn't be an investigation.
Click to expand...

Does anyone else find it amazing that liberals are so focused on Trump supposedly conspiring to pay off someone and yet no angst over the slush fund that Congress was supposed to have used to pay off other women!!

:facepalm:
 
I predict that Congress will not open those records this year, or ever, unless we force them to through their favorite method, the courts.
 
countryboy said:
Of course you don't, you're a leftist. You and your ilk have a penchant for Soviet style police state tactics. In this country, we are not supposed to investigate people, "and see what turns up". We investigate crimes. If there is no predicate crime, there shouldn't be an investigation.
Click to expand...

Does this seem odd to you:

"By Josh Rogin July 18, 2016
The Trump campaign worked behind the scenes last week to make sure the new Republican platform won’t call for giving weapons to Ukraine to fight Russian and rebel forces, contradicting the view of almost all Republican foreign policy leaders in Washington."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...3d06b37f256_story.html?utm_term=.0d0feb9321bf

How about this:

"Michael Flynn Was Paid to Represent Turkey’s Interests During Trump Campaign"
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/us/politics/michael-flynn-turkey.html

Or this:

"What we know about Paul Manafort's tangled web of connections to Russia"
https://www.businessinsider.com/paul-manafort-russia-ties-2017-10

People like you are what caused Pearl Harbor.
 
Havana Moon said:
I predict that Meuller will finally publish his report, there will be no collusion and not much else of consequence. The Dems will attempt to impeach Trump in the House anyway, which may well succeed but will be firmly rejected in the Senate. I also predict that the likes of Daesh will finally go completely apeshit and swallow a lethal dose of weasel jizz!
Click to expand...
Define try? If by that you mean the Democratic controlled house will vote articles of impeachment then you’ll be wrong for the obvious reason.
 
Damocles said:
Wouldn't it depend on whether he lied under oath in a deposition after painting a blue dress?
Click to expand...
It won’t happen. Excluding the immoral war in Iraq everyone with an IQ above 80 knows impeaching Clinton over lying about a blow job was the dumbest thing Republicans did in the last 20 years.
 
Damocles said:
It was an effect of mission creep, giving undefined investigative power to an Independent Counsel tends to get them to go after crap like perjury traps, etc. which allowed Starr to get into stuff like Paula Jones and semen stains where Clinton had testified no "sexual relations" ever happened. I do not like political investigations, not then and not now. This is why Clinton would not be convicted by the Senate and removed from office, and why the same will happen with anything the Dems dream up after Mueller's report is finally finished.
Click to expand...
There are some very interesting similarities between Nixon and Watergate, Reagan and Iran Contra and the Clinton impeachment. One major difference was Clinton was impeached over an insignificant triviality. I don’t cry any tears for Clinton over it as he was his own worst enemy and ultimately it hurt Republicans more than it did Clinton or Democrats as the American people saw through the partisan nonsense and Clinton remained more popular than them. In the end Clinton won.
 
Jack said:
I would think it would depend on what comes up.
If it comes down to Trump using campaign money to pay off a Porn Star over a sexual affair, I doubt most people would consider this as an Impeachable Offense, even though it might be illegal.
Money Laundering ... that might be viewed differently. Using the Office of President as a way to generate 'business deals' or make money for the Trump Organization might be viewed as an Impeachable Offense.
Flynn working for the Turks, Manafort working for the Russians. This raises some Red Flags. I have no problem seeing what turns up.
Click to expand...


Unless solid evidence is shown that Trump illegally collided with Russia, Democrats would be morons to impeach Trump. It would do them more harm than to Trump or the GOP.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Unless solid evidence is shown that Trump illegally collided with Russia, Democrats would be morons to impeach Trump. It would do them more harm than to Trump or the GOP.
Click to expand...

It looks like the tentacles of the Mueller investigation have spread in many different directions. I don't mind waiting until the investigation is over.
 
And the liberals will continue to chase Russia , Russia , Russia ....

When that belly flops ..... They will still be chasing Russia , Russia ,Russia .

Because they got .... Nothing else !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top