Newly Released J6 Footage Shows 'Non-Uniformed' Officers, Police Urging Pro-Trump Pro

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Testimony under oath is evidence. The testimony under oath is that Epps did not work for any law enforcement agency.
What do you have for evidence that Epps worked for the FBI? Oh, that's right. You only have RW speculation which is not evidence of anything.
Click to expand...

Who said that? The Jan 6 committee put people under oath to spew lies and propaganda
 
Into the Night said:
They were Antifa, BLM, FBI agents, capitol police, and Proud Boys, all acting on Democrat orders. I don't read or subscribe to the Epoch Times. You can't blame them for what Democrats have done.
Click to expand...

But you have presented no evidence any of them were Antifa, BLM, or FBI agents. Just accusations to put blame on others because you can't accept responsibility for the riot. You have no evidence about Democratic "orders." It is all made-up fake news. You still have presented 0 evidence of election fraud or one state in which abortion is murder.

Would you have obeyed those orders had you been there? None of the protestors had to obey orders from anybody else. Why did they do so?

What is the source of your information?
 
Nordberg said:
Which words said that? Is it " We fight like hell. If you do not fight like hell you are not going to have a country anymore"? Are that words of peace you heard? You do not even try. When I heard the rally and all the violence being stirred up, speaker after speaker, I was shocked. I did not think it could happen in America. When Trump said to demonstrate peacefully at the end as a throwaway. I figured his lawyers told him to say that to try and legally save his ass. Those words are in complete discord with the rally message.
Click to expand...

I doubt you watched anything you are just believing democrats lies and ignoring how Trump said to do it peacefully. Protesting peacefully is fighting like hell
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Testimony under oath is evidence. The testimony under oath is that Epps did not work for any law enforcement agency.
What do you have for evidence that Epps worked for the FBI? Oh, that's right. You only have RW speculation which is not evidence of anything.
Click to expand...

Testimony under oath is evidence if the jury believes it. Many times they do not.
 
Flash said:
But you have presented no evidence any of them were Antifa, BLM, or FBI agents.
Click to expand...
I and others already have. You even responded to it. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Flash said:
Just accusations to put blame on others because you can't accept responsibility for the riot.
Click to expand...
I did not cause any riot.
Flash said:
You have no evidence about Democratic "orders."
Click to expand...
Argument of the Stone fallacy. It is already been presented to you.
Flash said:
It is all made-up fake news.
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy. Blaming Trump for the riot is Fake News.
Flash said:
You still have presented 0 evidence of election fraud or one state in which abortion is murder.
Click to expand...
I already have. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Flash said:
Would you have obeyed those orders had you been there? None of the protestors had to obey orders from anybody else. Why did they do so?
Click to expand...
RQAA. I have already answered this question. Stop asking it over and over like a mindless moron.
Flash said:
What is the source of your information?
Click to expand...
RQAA. I have already answered this question too. So have others.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top