Newt makes a funny

LOL, No, not everybody, just for you freaks (GOP).

Yet a poll of likely voters, including all those other groups shows Newt beating Obama and your post said it was because he is the "flavor of the Month". You're not making sense. The poll didn't just cover republicans. Either everybody wants to try on the suit, or your judgment on why the poll is that way is a bit off...
 
Yet a poll of likely voters, including all those other groups shows Newt beating Obama and your post said it was because he is the "flavor of the Month". You're not making sense. The poll didn't just cover republicans. Either everybody wants to try on the suit, or your judgment on why the poll is that way is a bit off...

It doesn't matter is my point. Nothing you just said was relevant.
Last month it was Cain, the month before Christie, the month before Perry, the month before Bachmon, Mitt, Palin, whoever.
There are 11 months yet.

Finaly, (also irrelevant) I don't see Newt lasting 11 more months.
You guys are losing it.
 
It doesn't matter is my point. Nothing you just said was relevant.
Last month it was Cain, the month before Christie, the month before Perry, the month before Bachmon, Mitt, Palin, whoever.
There are 11 months yet.

Finaly, (also irrelevant) I don't see Newt lasting 11 more months.
You guys are losing it.

That's the point. A number of candidates could beat Obama. That's how bad your candy date is.

Admit it, if you were standing next to Obama and he farted, your nostrils would flare.
 
As always, it is a Rasmussen Poll, and they tend to suck. But its not really any different from what we've been hearing so far. Most polls do tend to go with generic Republican winning, while this is specific candidate, though. However, I do believe Pew and Gallup have been showing Romney as a winning candidate for months.
 
That's the point. A number of candidates could beat Obama. That's how bad your candy date is.

No, the point is the GOP are grabbing at straws.

"Help us! Help us!" they shout as their candidates wither on the vine. Campaign workers bouncing between candidates. Dump Newt. Return to Newt. Cain reassessing his campaign after one worker exclaimed, "Groping once, shame on you. Groping twice, shame on me. A 12 years affair?...I'm outta here!" :lol:
 
No, the point is the GOP are grabbing at straws.

"Help us! Help us!" they shout as their candidates wither on the vine. Campaign workers bouncing between candidates. Dump Newt. Return to Newt. Cain reassessing his campaign after one worker exclaimed, "Groping once, shame on you. Groping twice, shame on me. A 12 years affair?...I'm outta here!" :lol:

If his name was Bill Clinton then it wouldn't matter. It just confirms the fact that republicans have higher moral standards for a candidate. I wouldn't go around bragging about your lack of moral character.
 
If his name was Bill Clinton then it wouldn't matter. It just confirms the fact that republicans have higher moral standards for a candidate. I wouldn't go around bragging about your lack of moral character.

Are you frigging serious?

How many speakers of the house, (second in line to be Commander in Chief) have been expelled by their own party?
The fact that you bozos would consider him at all is proof of moral infirmity.
 
Are you frigging serious?

How many speakers of the house, (second in line to be Commander in Chief) have been expelled by their own party?
The fact that you bozos would consider him at all is proof of moral infirmity.

You didn't mind have an impreached President running the country. Your fake outrage is kinda funny.
 
It doesn't matter is my point. Nothing you just said was relevant.
Last month it was Cain, the month before Christie, the month before Perry, the month before Bachmon, Mitt, Palin, whoever.
There are 11 months yet.

Finaly, (also irrelevant) I don't see Newt lasting 11 more months.
You guys are losing it.

Newt has already advocated for a sort of Amnesty for illegals in the country already and it threatens to split the Republican party right down the middle.

We're going to wind up with Ron Paul or some other TeaParty nutjob running as an indy and it will split the Rightie vote, giving the 2012 election to Obama!
 
You didn't mind have an impreached President running the country. Your fake outrage is kinda funny.

And you support having an adulterer in the White House as long as he has an (R) after his name.

Nice double standard there, buddy!

Divorced his wife while she was in the HOSPITAL for a CANCER scare! And you support him...ROTFLMAO!
 
If his name was Bill Clinton then it wouldn't matter. It just confirms the fact that republicans have higher moral standards for a candidate. I wouldn't go around bragging about your lack of moral character.

In case you're not aware there is a difference between an "error in judgement", as it's frequently referred to, and a 12 year affair.

As for choosing Newt over Cain, yes, I can see the Repub higher standard. Cheating on two wives is morality superior to assorted gropings and one 12 year affair. Glad you shed light on your moral character and how you conduct your ratings.
 
If his name was Bill Clinton then it wouldn't matter. It just confirms the fact that republicans have higher moral standards for a candidate. I wouldn't go around bragging about your lack of moral character.

I see the Repub scale regarding moral standards. The Repubs are choosing Newt over Cain concluding cheating on two wives is morally superior to assorted gropings and and cheating on one wife by indulging in a 12 year affair. Thanks for explaining the rating system concerning the Repub moral character and yours in particular.

Looks like when it comes to morals the Repubs have a long way to go to match the current no-affair, no groping, married President. Good luck.

Edit: Oops, double post. I must be hungry. Time for lunch.
 
Who said it? 'Character Counts'! oh yea it was Limbaugh.... LOL!

We know the character of the right's candidates. It's very clear.
 
Back
Top