No Kings Day Protest - October 18, 2025

Well I had my fun. There was actually a pretty good turnout for both sides. On one side of the street were the no kingers,....on the other side of the street facing them were the normal GOOD Americans. So I drove slowly down the street right between them with my coolest pair of shades on while blasting Stevie Wonders " very superstitious" as loud as I could! GREAT beat that song... :) Then of course I alternated by throwing out the high five and thumbs up sign to the normal GOOD Americans and flipping the bird to the evil Communists on the other side. Good times! Hell,..I may even go again!
 
Last edited:
G3jlOmDWYAAQoLP
 
My engagement with a few old, ragged, empty headed, demented white liberal loon women concerning their protesting 'NO KINGS' day:

My engagement with these leftist loons happened in the blue city of Haverhill, Taxachusetts. I calmly walked up to them and pointed
to their NO KINGS signs and asked who is this King that you are referring to? Three or four of them screamed out the Orange Man
Donald Trump. I then asked them if they knew that Trump just received a medal of honor for being the 'KING of WORLDWIDE PEACE'
for his having stopped 7 or 8 worldwide wars. Then I asked them, are you still sure you don't want a KING that stops most all of our
worldwide wars? They then gave me the finger and turned away from me in total shame.
 
Oh, for sure - the right in general is very upset about today, from the politicians in DC to this board.

Pretty easy to see.

I'm gong there now. I'm going to help protect democracy.
No one is upset, just amused...You go now and believe that with your participation, you are "protecting democracy"...
You still haven't been able to tell us why, but perhaps when you get home you can enlighten us....and tell us what we have to look forward to as a result of the march...I hope you wore yellow, as instructed...
 
My engagement with a few old, ragged, empty headed, demented white liberal loon women concerning their protesting 'NO KINGS' day:

My engagement with these leftist loons happened in the blue city of Haverhill, Taxachusetts. I calmly walked up to them and pointed
to their NO KINGS signs and asked who is this King that you are referring to? Three or four of them screamed out the Orange Man
Donald Trump. I then asked them if they knew that Trump just received a medal of honor for being the 'KING of WORLDWIDE PEACE'
for his having stopped 7 or 8 worldwide wars. Then I asked them, are you still sure you don't want a KING that stops most all of our
worldwide wars? They then gave me the finger and turned away from me in total shame.
You harshed their mellow, you conservative you...:)
(I wish that President Trump had donned a crown and set up a throne in the new Rose Garden Club...;))
 
Last edited:

  • Obama separated parents from their children at the border.
  • Obama prosecuted mothers for coming to the United States illegally.
  • He fast tracked deportations.
  • And yes, he housed unaccompanied children in tent cities.

Obama's actions failed to get much attention.

One of the most controversial measures that Obama took was to resurrect the almost-abandoned practice of detaining mothers and children to deter future illegal immigration.

The government had one facility in central Pennsylvania and added three larger facilities in Texas and New Mexico holding thousands.

Obama would eventually face legal challenges that stopped him from detaining mothers and children indefinitely.

A federal judge in California ruled that the Obama administration was violating a 20-year old case, known as Flores when it kept families detained for longer than 20 days.

"King" Obama took other "tyrannical" steps as well, including fighting to block efforts to require unaccompanied children to have legal representation and barring detained mothers with their children from being released on bond.




 
GettyImages-136052891.0.jpg




REMEMBER WHEN OBAMA DELIVERED IMMIGRANT KIDS TO MOLESTERS LIKE SO MANY PIZZAS?



The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report.

In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America.

At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death.

Local law enforcement uncovered the operation, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.

“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering the victims into the hands of their abusers.”

As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed.

Officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.

The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor.

HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.

The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015.




Where were the superannuated grannies marching then?
 
My engagement with a few old, ragged, empty headed, demented white liberal loon women concerning their protesting 'NO KINGS' day:

My engagement with these leftist loons happened in the blue city of Haverhill, Taxachusetts. I calmly walked up to them and pointed
to their NO KINGS signs and asked who is this King that you are referring to? Three or four of them screamed out the Orange Man
Donald Trump. I then asked them if they knew that Trump just received a medal of honor for being the 'KING of WORLDWIDE PEACE'
for his having stopped 7 or 8 worldwide wars. Then I asked them, are you still sure you don't want a KING that stops most all of our
worldwide wars? They then gave me the finger and turned away from me in total shame.
And what “medal of honor” was that? And what 8 worldwide wars did he stop?
 
AI Overview
1760810853008.png
1760810853113.png
1760810853189.png
+7


While family separations did happen during the Obama administration, there was no systematic policy to separate families as a deterrent, as there was under the "zero tolerance" policy of the Trump administration
. The Obama administration's family separations were far less common and occurred under specific, narrower circumstances.

Under the Obama administration
Separations under President Obama were not an official or widespread policy but occurred in specific, limited circumstances.
  • Criminal record: Separations primarily happened if a parent had a serious criminal conviction or an outstanding warrant.
  • Health and safety concerns: In rare instances, a child might be separated for health or safety reasons.
  • Small-scale cases: While individual cases did occur, former Obama officials and immigration advocates have stated that the administration did not systematically separate children from their parents as a matter of policy.

Under the Trump administration
In contrast, the Trump administration implemented a "zero tolerance" policy that led to widespread, systematic family separations.
  • Systematic separation: The policy, announced in April 2018, directed federal prosecutors to criminally charge every person caught crossing the border illegally.
  • Mass prosecution: Because children cannot be held in adult criminal detention facilities, prosecuting their parents immediately triggered the separation of families.
  • Deterrent tactic: The policy was used as a deterrent, with officials stating that harming children would dissuade other families from coming to the U.S..
  • Increased separations: Under this policy, thousands of families were separated in a short period. This was a significant increase compared to prior administrations.

Distinctions between the two administrations
A crucial difference is the intent and scale of the separations.
  • Policy vs. individual cases: The Trump administration made family separation a key element of its immigration enforcement policy to serve as a deterrent, which was not the case under Obama.
  • Purpose of separation: Under Obama, separations were generally for legitimate concerns like protecting a child from an adult with a serious criminal history. Under Trump, separations were a consequence of the mass prosecution policy, regardless of a parent's criminal history.
  • Record keeping: In its rushed implementation, the Trump administration failed to keep adequate records to track and reunite many of the separated families, causing widespread chaos.
 
It happened during "King" Obama's Reign of Error. Was there a nationwide protest?



25Marquez-sub-superJumbo.jpg




I came to this country from El Salvador in 2014 seeking safety for myself and my son. Instead, I found myself locked in a family immigration detention center. It’s an experience that I wouldn’t wish on anyone.

I was forced to flee my country because of violence and threats of violence against me and my family. When I was a teenager, my father and I witnessed a murder by local gang members. In 2005, my father was murdered for having testified.

The gangs threatened me as well, but since the murder case got dropped, I was able to continue my life and found a job in law enforcement. However, several years later, they threatened to kill me too. That’s when I decided I had to leave and bring my son and my 16-year-old sister with me. If we had stayed, they could’ve killed us all.

I needed to find a safe place for my sister, my son and myself. Our only option was to flee to a country where we couldn’t be found as easily — the United States. But after we crossed the border, we found no relief. Instead, we were held for two months in a family immigration detention center in Artesia, N.M., run by a for-profit company.

The day-to-day conditions were horrible. The food was often expired, the milk was spoiled, and we weren’t provided with snacks for our children between meals. When we saved food for snacks, it was taken from us and thrown out because of concerns about rats in the dorms. Children went to bed hungry. And we could get water between meals only by asking the officers. Sometimes they wouldn’t bring any. The water we did have made us sick.

It was no place for human beings, let alone for families with small children.

When our children were sick, we waited days for medical attention. When one mother whose daughter had asthma informed the officers that her child needed medical care, she was told that she should have thought about that before she came to the United States. Another mother asked for medical assistance for her son but it never came. She was deported, and her son died just a few months later.

We weren’t allowed to sleep in the same beds as our children, even the youngest ones who wanted to sleep with their mothers to feel safe. Deportations usually happened in the middle of the night, with flashlights pointed in our faces to wake us up.

Most of the officers didn’t speak Spanish, which made it hard to communicate. Things were even worse for the indigenous women among us who spoke only their native languages. Once, officers physically forced an indigenous woman to take a shower while she was menstruating, violating both her privacy and her cultural beliefs. As a woman, witnessing this type of treatment was heartbreaking — and it has stayed with me in the years since.

Until we joined together to demand it, there was no legal assistance available to inform us our rights or guide us through the asylum process. Many women were deported before seeing a judge because they were pressured by officers to sign deportation papers.

The effect on our children was undeniable.

The younger children were very confused about why they were trapped inside. The stories they acted out when they were playing always recreated the dangerous journey they had just gone through to get here. The characters in their games became coyotes (smugglers who help people cross the border), “la migra” (border patrol agents) and immigration judges. The detention center became their entire world. The ones who were old enough to understand what was happening had trouble coping, and I heard of teenagers who tried to take their own lives.

My son, who is now 10 years old, rarely talks about the experience, so it’s hard to know how deeply it has affected him.

My teenage sister also suffered in detention. She was already affected by the situation in El Salvador and the death of our father, but being inside the detention center affected her even more. Not being able to feel free and being treated like less than human caused her a deep depression, and to this day, she needs constant psychiatric support.

Other children I know from the detention center are clearly traumatized, afraid of police officers and constantly worried about going back. They remember it for what it was: a prison.


THESE EVENTS OCCURRED IN 2014 & 2015 WHILE "KING" OBAMA INFESTED THE OVAL OFFICE - THE ULTRA-LIBERAL FAILING NEW YORK TIMES DID NOT PUBLISH THE STORY DURING OBAMA'S REIGN OF ERROR, FOR SOME REASON

 
Back
Top