No Kings Day Protest - October 18, 2025

I think an expectation somehow coalesced for the Democrats, maybe around 2012, that the possibility of electorally meaningful dissent from the right would soon be neutralized by a combination of bureaucracy, demographics, the courts, and decisive teleological forces (the Arc of History), and that these final steps of "progressivism" could be helped along by a little illiberalism - for "the greater good", of course.

I suspect that the deflation of this forlorn hope in part explains the unhinged rage of Democrats like Jay Jones, who not only fantasized about murdering a Republican opponent for office, but his children as well.

It's my considered opinion that by any reasonable standard of ‘normal politics’ this is aberrant behavior that would be hard to justify, but it hasn’t been disavowed by the Democrat Party AFAIK.

I think the takeaway could be that a lot of Democrats talked themselves into the expectation of an incipient ascent to power beyond what normal electoral politics grants and a lot of the hysterics about ‘fascism,’ ‘authoritarianism,’ and ‘no Kings’ are just projection of their own demons.

I think you can take this premise and draw a line that connects everything from ‘Russiagate’ to the Virginia AG election to whatever they’re trying to engineer next.
 
I think an expectation somehow coalesced for the Democrats, maybe around 2012, that the possibility of electorally meaningful dissent from the right would soon be neutralized by a combination of bureaucracy, demographics, the courts, and decisive teleological forces (the Arc of History), and that these final steps of "progressivism" could be helped along by a little illiberalism - for "the greater good", of course.

I suspect that the deflation of this forlorn hope in part explains the unhinged rage of Democrats like Jay Jones, who not only fantasized about murdering a Republican opponent for office, but his children as well.

It's my considered opinion that by any reasonable standard of ‘normal politics’ this is aberrant behavior that would be hard to justify, but it hasn’t been disavowed by the Democrat Party AFAIK.

I think the takeaway could be that a lot of Democrats talked themselves into the expectation of an incipient ascent to power beyond what normal electoral politics grants and a lot of the hysterics about ‘fascism,’ ‘authoritarianism,’ and ‘no Kings’ are just projection of their own demons.

I think you can take this premise and draw a line that connects everything from ‘Russiagate’ to the Virginia AG election to whatever they’re trying to engineer next.

Totalitarian psychopaths hate authoritarianism, and have to invent it if it doesn't exist, in order to take power for themselves. These clowns have no idea where their propaganda comes from, and they don't care, they just hate, period, and being deviants and outsiders they are only concerned about tearing it all down and running amuck murdering and stealing. The Reds know how to manipulate these useful idiots, providing them with a shallow veneer of 'legitimacy' via a lot of pseudo-intellectual political rubbish and terminology and imaginary culture wars. They don't really have any interest at 'building a better world n stuff', they're just angry little Burb Brats getting back at mommy and daddy, having never made it through puberty and are still just angry 10 year olds for life. Dope and degenerate desensitization by porn and affluenza are the main causes of their stunted mental development. their lives are just a long string of psychotic episodes and demands for instant gratification of all their whims and fads.
 
Last edited:
I think an expectation somehow coalesced for the Democrats, maybe around 2012, that the possibility of electorally meaningful dissent from the right would soon be neutralized by a combination of bureaucracy, demographics, the courts, and decisive teleological forces (the Arc of History), and that these final steps of "progressivism" could be helped along by a little illiberalism - for "the greater good", of course.

I suspect that the deflation of this forlorn hope in part explains the unhinged rage of Democrats like Jay Jones, who not only fantasized about murdering a Republican opponent for office, but his children as well.

It's my considered opinion that by any reasonable standard of ‘normal politics’ this is aberrant behavior that would be hard to justify, but it hasn’t been disavowed by the Democrat Party AFAIK.

I think the takeaway could be that a lot of Democrats talked themselves into the expectation of an incipient ascent to power beyond what normal electoral politics grants and a lot of the hysterics about ‘fascism,’ ‘authoritarianism,’ and ‘no Kings’ are just projection of their own demons.

I think you can take this premise and draw a line that connects everything from ‘Russiagate’ to the Virginia AG election to whatever they’re trying to engineer next.


Upon further reflection, I believe the absolute sea-change I've noted in the Democrats' abandonment of the historical demographics of their base is another marker of how confident they felt in imposing one-party dominance in perpetuity.

"Learn to code", they said, and by scoffing at the working class without regard for their economic well-being they were signaling a bellwether for this, IMO.
 
Upon further reflection, I believe the absolute sea-change I've noted in the Democrats' abandonment of the historical demographics of their base is another marker of how confident they felt in imposing one-party dominance in perpetuity.

"Learn to code", they said, and by scoffing at the working class without regard for their economic well-being they were signaling a bellwether for this, IMO.
Pity the poor Maga/Alt-Right troll. So thirsty for attention that he's responding/expanding on his absurd supposition and conjecture.

This is what's burning his ass, dear readers:

www.cnn.com/2025/06/14/us/gallery/no-kings-protests
 
Upon further reflection, I believe the absolute sea-change I've noted in the Democrats' abandonment of the historical demographics of their base is another marker of how confident they felt in imposing one-party dominance in perpetuity.

"Learn to code", they said, and by scoffing at the working class without regard for their economic well-being they were signaling a bellwether for this, IMO.

They finally seized enough power to go after their goals with the elections of the Watergate Babies. Soon after the electoral shift they pushed through the 'Super Delegate Rule' and forever banished those uppity proles from any say in the Democratic Party and created their own Cadre model of Party rule.
 
Not possible with these gimps.

I gave him the opportunity. Everyone makes typographical errors, although I don't see how one would claim using "your" instead of "you're" as a typo. Your is a possessive adjective, denoting ownership. You're is a contraction of "you are".

Maybe autocorrect.
 
I gave him the opportunity. Everyone makes typographical errors, although I don't see how one would claim using "your" instead of "you're" as a typo. Your is a possessive adjective, denoting ownership. You're is a contraction of "you are".

Maybe autocorrect.
Eddie's on my ignore list after proving what a trollish clown he is .... incapable of debating an issue rationally and logically beyond a short period. I just see his name when others respond to him but I can't see his blather (a wonderful aspect of this site).

That you two trolls are circle jerking over a typo because you can't actually debate a topic to logically/factually defend your stances and assertions is pretty pathetic ... but not surprising. Carry on.

Burn, baby, burn!

 
Eddie's on my ignore list after proving what a trollish clown he is .... incapable of debating an issue rationally and logically beyond a short period. I just see his name when others respond to him but I can't see his blather (a wonderful aspect of this site).


It does appear to me as though you might be the possessor of some tender sensibilities.
 
Back
Top