While you're at it, take a look at the world-wide revenue from sales.
You don't think Iraq and Afghanistan were, and still are, detrimental to the overall US economy? So, yes, we are always sacrificing our overall economy (jobs, productivity, credit, etc.) when we engage in war. Our federal deficits and debt for the last decade would be smaller if not for the War on Terror.
Is that why WWII is credited with lifting America out of the Depression via increased government spending, poster whose alias and avatar are those of a girl?
Maybe Congress should close Lewis-McChord, discharge all the USAF reservists who post from their duty station, and lay off all the civilian employees.
No impact on the community, huh?
http://www.museum.siu.edu/museum_classroom_grant/Museum_Explorers/school_pages/bourbonnais/page6.htm
Congress has been doing that to bases for quite some time, but in the last several years alone, it has done that to several bases around the US. Hell, the stated purpose of the Joint Base concept is to save on operational costs. The economy did not recover until 1950. While WWII is given credit by ignorant people, all it did was temporarily make the job situation disappear. Of course, we could just implement a peacetime draft like Truman did after WWII was over, and fix our jobs problem now, right? What WWII did do was obliterate much of the world's infrastructure, giving the US an unfair advantage for the following two decades. Shall we give that gimic another try as well?
All of the talking points that Legion posted are BS. The recovery occurred after WWII, as the US found itself able to get things done in a bombed-out world.