Now its, Trump has a constitutional duty to investigate Biden-- whoops I mean Ukraine

C

Centerleftfl

Verified User
Well, let's TRY throwing this shit against the wall. Rudy again...

Giuliani walloped for claim Trump has constitutional duty to pressure Ukraine to probe Biden

travissq.gif

Published
1 min ago on
December 6, 2019
By Travis Gettys
giuliani_fox_screenshot.jpg


​
Rudy Giuliani claimed President Donald Trump had a constitutional obligation to carry out the Ukraine scheme, and was quickly drowned in mockery.
The president’s personal attorney jumped to an unusual legal conclusion based on Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution to defend Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden — which Giuliani is continuing to pursue this week in a visit to Kyiv.

​
“Presidential Legal Obligations 101,” Giuliani tweeted. “Art 2, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution obligates the President to investigate and ask for investigations of corruption in countries we provide funds to. Who ever heard of a president being impeached for carrying out his constitutional mandate?”

Rudy Giuliani
✔@RudyGiuliani

Presidential Legal Obligations 101:

Art 2, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution obligates the President to investigate and ask for investigations of corruption in countries we provide funds to.

Who ever heard of a president being impeached for carrying out his constitutional mandate?

​

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/gi...onal-duty-to-pressure-ukraine-to-probe-biden/
 
great point Rudy

I too would like to know what Hunter Biden was providing to warrant such a position, that's the elephant in the room
 
Centerleftfl said:
Well, let's TRY throwing this shit against the wall. Rudy again...

Giuliani walloped for claim Trump has constitutional duty to pressure Ukraine to probe Biden

travissq.gif

Published
1 min ago on
December 6, 2019
By Travis Gettys
giuliani_fox_screenshot.jpg


​
[FONT=&]Rudy Giuliani claimed President Donald Trump had a constitutional obligation to carry out the Ukraine scheme, and was quickly drowned in mockery.[/FONT]
[FONT=&]The president’s personal attorney jumped to an unusual legal conclusion based on Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution to defend Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden — which Giuliani is continuing to pursue this week in a visit to Kyiv.[/FONT]

​
[FONT=&]“Presidential Legal Obligations 101,” Giuliani tweeted. “Art 2, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution obligates the President to investigate and ask for investigations of corruption in countries we provide funds to. Who ever heard of a president being impeached for carrying out his constitutional mandate?”
[/FONT]
Rudy Giuliani
✔@RudyGiuliani

Presidential Legal Obligations 101:

Art 2, Sec. 3 of the US Constitution obligates the President to investigate and ask for investigations of corruption in countries we provide funds to.

Who ever heard of a president being impeached for carrying out his constitutional mandate?

​

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/gi...onal-duty-to-pressure-ukraine-to-probe-biden/
Click to expand...

Well, let's TRY throwing this shit against the wall.

LOL..thats rich, the Dims have been trowing shit against the wall since day one of the Trump Presidency!
 
”Is it true, as the image suggests, that Hunter Biden was serving as "a director to Ukraine’s largest private gas producer" when the elder Biden "threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into" the gas company?

• Hunter Biden did hold a directorship for a Ukrainian gas company while his father was vice president. Experts agree that Hunter Biden's acceptance of the position created a conflict of interest for his father

• Vice President Joe Biden did urge Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, with the threat of withholding U.S. aid. But that was the position of the wider U.S. government, as well as other international institutions.”
fact-check.com
 
Earl said:
”Is it true, as the image suggests, that Hunter Biden was serving as "a director to Ukraine’s largest private gas producer" when the elder Biden "threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into" the gas company?

• Hunter Biden did hold a directorship for a Ukrainian gas company while his father was vice president. Experts agree that Hunter Biden's acceptance of the position created a conflict of interest for his father

• Vice President Joe Biden did urge Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, with the threat of withholding U.S. aid. But that was the position of the wider U.S. government, as well as other international institutions.”
fact-check.com
Click to expand...

Earl, you do a lousy job of misrepresenting facts.
 
Who in their right mind would have Rudy Giuliani as their lawyer???? The only thing Rudy has manage to do is to get himself in legal trouble, such a joke.
 
Getin the ring said:
great point Rudy

I too would like to know what Hunter Biden was providing to warrant such a position, that's the elephant in the room
Click to expand...

Why didn't you and your republican cohorts demand this information in trumps first year in office, or even his second. No. only after Biden became a candidate for president did you show the least bit of interest. You really don't give a shit as to what happened, so long as you can smear Joe.
Does that about sum it up?
 
Why has Trump sent Ghouliani back to Ukraine to threaten them about US power if they don't investigate Biden?
Why is the Ghoul meeting with Russian intelligence and corrupt Russian defrocked prosecutors to alter the next election?
Why isn't the Ghoul not being arrested already?
 
Hunter's compensation may have been high, but it was not at all out of line for any member of a board of a major oil corporation.
Joe Biden helped oust a corrupt prosecutor as was US public stated policy for not prosecuting Burisma.

Your Russian theories don't make sense.
 
IF its his responsibility to investigate Biden, then its clearly his duty to investigate Manafort, Giuliani, and Gates.
 
floridafan said:
Why didn't you and your republican cohorts demand this information in trumps first year in office, or even his second. No. only after Biden became a candidate for president did you show the least bit of interest. You really don't give a shit as to what happened, so long as you can smear Joe.
Does that about sum it up?
Click to expand...

Exactly. And isn't it telling how uninterested in corruption in *other* countries we give zillions to? You know, like Pakistan, Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, etc.

https://www.concernusa.org/story/foreign-aid-by-country/
 
floridafan said:
Why didn't you and your republican cohorts demand this information in trumps first year in office, or even his second. No. only after Biden became a candidate for president did you show the least bit of interest. You really don't give a shit as to what happened, so long as you can smear Joe.
Does that about sum it up?
Click to expand...

sure does sum it up,
you're lost desperate and triggered to madness

I found Hillary for you, she's fine

hilleat.jpg

ThatOwlWoman said:
Exactly. And isn't it telling how uninterested in corruption in *other* countries we give zillions to? You know, like Pakistan, Israel, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, etc.

https://www.concernusa.org/story/foreign-aid-by-country/
Click to expand...

and it's hard to beleive that you are even still here, you have been labeled the forum nut**bag, you took over for evince, do you not know that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top