Now they threaten violence....

As usual the RW/Fox snooze only reports what they choose to in the most sleazy manner....no surprise.

Steven Crowder, the Fox News contributor and Breitbart acolyte who admits he went to Lansing, Michigan union protests looking for trouble and is now touting, with a lot of help from Fox News, a highly-edited video showing him getting punched by "union thugs," was on Hannity again tonight. But this time, there was another guest who accused Crowder of pushing the man to the ground first. Hannity denied that happened. But Crowder never did.

Last night, I wrote that there was something very fishy about Crowder’s behavior as he discussed the incident on Hannity the first time. I also noted that questions have arisen about the integrity of his video. For example, the New York Times reported:

Unfortunately for Mr. Crowder, a look at the video broadcast on the Sean Hannity show appears to show quite clearly that he left out an important section of the footage when he put together his edit. A section of the Fox News broadcast preserved by the Web site Mediaite shows that Mr. Hannity’s producers at Fox News started the clip five seconds earlier than Mr. Crowder did. What the extra footage reveals is the man who punched Mr. Crowder being knocked to the ground seconds before and then getting up and taking a swing at the comedian.

There is one more anomaly in Mr. Crowder’s edit of the footage shot by his associates. The still frame he used for the clip’s title image on YouTube, (http://www.youtube.com/user/StevenCrowder/videos?view=0) which offers a much clearer image of the man punching him, was obviously shot by a second camera, from an entirely different angle than the rest of the footage he presented of the man hitting him. If Mr. Crowder wants to clear up the mystery of exactly what happened just before he was punched, it might make sense for him to release any footage of the incident shot from that second angle.
Click to expand...

Hannity, of course, was not only completely supportive of Crowder’s version of events, he seemed downright eager to use it to inflame hostility toward liberals. Again. Hannity said the incident represents "The ugly and twisted and dark soul of liberalism," accused the left of "becoming increasingly vicious and violent" and said the "thugs" need to be "restrained" and "arrested." He said, "Law and order has to prevail. If it doesn’t, this violence is going to spread, there will be blood in the streets and at some point, some people may, in fact, die. Now that’s the course we are currently on."

<snip>

http://www.newshounds.us/steven_crowder_doesn_t_deny_pushing_to_the_gr
Click to expand...

The stupidity continues.
 
LOL You are desperate. Are you trying to say that Crowder pushed the guy? Stop being a pussy yourself, make that accusation plain and stop fishing.
 
When you take food from working people's table, shoes from their children's feet and then try to vilify them on faux 'news', of course workers are going to get pissed.

The midterm backlash is going to hurt you worse than the election you just lost. Workers are tired of being shit on by the radical right.
 
Crashk said:
When you take food from working people's table, shoes from their children's feet and then try to vilify them on faux 'news', of course workers are going to get pissed.

The midterm backlash is going to hurt you worse than the election you just lost. Workers are tired of being shit on by the radical right.
Click to expand...
isn't that what you freeloaders do with raising taxes or imposing penalties to pay for your healthcare? you're taking food off my table and shoe's off my kids feet.....
 
"Right douchebag were taking food right out of their children's mouths."

what the fuck does that mean?
 
DamnYankee said:
Folks have donated $600k for a bounty to find the thug, and Crowder has challenged the guy to fight in a legal MMA bout and he won't press charges, winner take it plus his matching amount, or be hunted down and a rat and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Who's the pussy now?
Click to expand...

Link?
 
Crashk said:
"Right douchebag were taking food right out of their children's mouths."

what the fuck does that mean?
Click to expand...
It means that you're a whiny douchebag who's crying because people have the freedom to work without being forced into a union so are trying to justify thugs beating people up, threatening to kill them and destroying property.
 
DamnYankee said:
It means that you're a whiny douchebag who's crying because people have the freedom to work without being forced into a union so are trying to justify thugs beating people up, threatening to kill them and destroying property.
Click to expand...

Prove anyone has ever been forced to join a union.
 
Rune said:
So they force you to work at a union shop? You can't choose to work at a non-union shop?
Click to expand...
Not if you get a job with Ford, GM or Chrysler. Why do you hate free choice?

Just admit that the entire union thing is a scheme to enrich union bosses and to support the Democrat Party candidates, and we can move on.
 
We know you want the 47% or even the 99% to work for slave wages. It's part of your party's ideology. So when hard working union members see a faux 'news' shill there to discredit their right to earn a living you can expect violence.

The backlash is going to be huge. You have 2 yrs to save enough money for some psychiatric help.

Freeloaders are people who will work for less in a union shop and still get the benefits that were fought for over the last 100 yrs. When I was a member of the United Steel Workers we called them scabs.

The reason you are so anti-worker is because the rich international donors to your party want to destroy the Democratic party and 'take our country back' to the 1850's. This will eventually affect you but you are too stupid to see it thru the Faux 'news' propaganda haze.
 
Actually I want 100% to be able to choose to join the union or not. Looks like I won in Wisconsin, and now Michigan. With regards to the 47% freeloaders, I want them all to pay the same tax rate as I do, or else agree to be wards of the state in return for relinquishing their voting rights.
 
DamnYankee said:
Not if you get a job with Ford, GM or Chrysler. Why do you hate free choice?

Just admit that the entire union thing is a scheme to enrich union bosses and to support the Democrat Party candidates, and we can move on.
Click to expand...

Just admit the entire anti-union thing is a scheme to further enrich the very rich and disenfranchise those who nactually produce the wealth and we can move on.
 
DamnYankee said:
Actually I want 100% to be able to choose to join the union or not. Looks like I won in Wisconsin, and now Michigan. With regards to the 47% freeloaders, I want them all to pay the same tax rate as I do, or else agree to be wards of the state in return for relinquishing their voting rights.
Click to expand...

I want Romney to pay the same rate I do. Agreed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top