Now THIS is interesting.

[Irish Exit]

That's categorically wrong from a scientific standpoint. Science has nothing to say about the ultimate source of creation...for obvious reasons.

LOL. Can't seriously believe that you said that, let alone believe it.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

LOL. Can't seriously believe that you said that, let alone believe it.

Really? What are your qualifications in biology?

 

[Irish Exit]

Really? What are your qualifications in biology?

I am biological. You?

 

[Mott the Hoople]

I am biological. You?

Yes but have you actually studied it?

 

[Irish Exit]

Yes but have you actually studied it?

Sure I dissected a cat and all that, but that has zero to do with your chagrin. The existence of the Big Bang Theory refutes your assertion. Etiology is the backbone of particle physics. To suggest that those scientists are not out to disprove a creator is beyond rational. That you are grounding you argument in biology of all things is a non-starter anyway. Even theoretical physicist have been obsessed with filling in the BBT gap to explain away the laws of thermodynamics not being laws because of their failure to explain the first reaction and first particle, so they have come up with the theories that the universe has no beginning at all.