NY state ignores 2nd Amendment, darla approves. NY state deletes 1st Amendment, darla

SmarterthanYou said:
since liberals like to equate freedom to being free from responsibility, anon speech should be right up there alley.
Click to expand...

That's one point of view. On the other hand maybe you don't really know liberals and what they equate with freedom.

the only reason it's not now is I've managed to put it in a bad light.
Click to expand...

I don't see it as a bad light, at all. Why shouldn't people own their speech? We have enough liars and troublemakers and bullshitters and cowards. Look what happened with AIDS when people kept it "private". The information would leak out and the person was discriminated against until others had the balls to speak out. The same with homosexuality. Once people realized the number and character of homosexual individuals the filthy, perverted view people had changed.

Single mothers. Abortion. The list goes on.

Too much privacy/anonymity not only stops progress but it gives a venue for people to disrupt and/or control society. No better example of its malevolency is the government.

The bright side is it's changing. Just like the caller's phone number shows up on the phone maybe we'll see the person's IP number show up on emails and have an option available to place emails without an IP number automatically in spam. Just think how many sales gimmicks would disappear.

"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should." :)
 
apple0154 said:
That's one point of view. On the other hand maybe you don't really know liberals and what they equate with freedom.



I don't see it as a bad light, at all. Why shouldn't people own their speech? We have enough liars and troublemakers and bullshitters and cowards. Look what happened with AIDS when people kept it "private". The information would leak out and the person was discriminated against until others had the balls to speak out. The same with homosexuality. Once people realized the number and character of homosexual individuals the filthy, perverted view people had changed.

Single mothers. Abortion. The list goes on.

Too much privacy/anonymity not only stops progress but it gives a venue for people to disrupt and/or control society. No better example of its malevolency is the government.

The bright side is it's changing. Just like the caller's phone number shows up on the phone maybe we'll see the person's IP number show up on emails and have an option available to place emails without an IP number automatically in spam. Just think how many sales gimmicks would disappear.

"And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should." :)
Click to expand...


Anal sex between 2 men is viewed in a new way.....you bet......

the filthy, perverted view people had of homosexual individuals has really changed.....................lol

So now Apple can feel accepted in the normal society......
 
Yurt said:
it doesn't? what authority do you have to cite this?

ACLU v. Miller....scotus disagrees with you.
Click to expand...

Well the SCOTUS is wrong. that is the only possible explanation for the discrepancy.

Those dumpasses think money can talk.
 
Occupant said:
Well the SCOTUS is wrong. that is the only possible explanation for the discrepancy.

Those dumpasses think money can talk.
Click to expand...

fair enough. they have been wrong before and overturned their own rulings. in this case, they haven't, i'm interested in why you believe they are wrong.

and where did they say money can talk? what case is that? please cite case name and jump cite, thank you.
 
Yurt said:
fair enough. they have been wrong before and overturned their own rulings. in this case, they haven't, i'm interested in why you believe they are wrong.

and where did they say money can talk? what case is that? please cite case name and jump cite, thank you.
Click to expand...

Money as freedom of speech in political contributions.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
since liberals like to equate freedom to being free from responsibility, anon speech should be right up there alley. the only reason it's not now is I've managed to put it in a bad light.
Click to expand...

That's conservatives who like to do that. Like when we state clearly that any employer who doesn't pay minimum wage will be fined, an employer violates that policy, and then conservatives whine and moan and think that we should allow this employer to abandon his responsibility. Conservatives have NO faith in personal responsibility, all they want is freedom of slavery and freedom of theft, that's all that matters to them.
 
Occupant said:
Money as freedom of speech in political contributions.
Click to expand...

"Money is speech". That is very recent case law, although it's never really been part of the American tradition, and is merely a new invention on the part of a fascist supreme court which hates freedom and wants to enslave us, like all rightists.
 
KissingCommies said:
That's conservatives who like to do that. Like when we state clearly that any employer who doesn't pay minimum wage will be fined, an employer violates that policy, and then conservatives whine and moan and think that we should allow this employer to abandon his responsibility. Conservatives have NO faith in personal responsibility, all they want is freedom of slavery and freedom of theft, that's all that matters to them.
Click to expand...
conservatives don't want to be free from responsibility, they want to push responsibility on everyone for everything.
 
bravo said:
Anal sex between 2 men is viewed in a new way.....you bet......

the filthy, perverted view people had of homosexual individuals has really changed.....................lol

So now Apple can feel accepted in the normal society......
Click to expand...

Awww, you're so cute when you try to be funny. As \\\lll/// would say, "Poor Blabbo."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top