NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani: “We are forced to raid the rainy day fund, retiree benefit fund, and to increase property taxes…”

Grokmaster said:
WTF are you blatherring about?

The little, chubby rich boy "socialist" is getting ready to steal pensions from New Yorkers....pensions THEY PAID FOR.

Are you drunK?
Click to expand...
I think he's just stupid. Most of the libs on this forum are semi-literate retards who never grew up. It's pretty pathetic with this place has become. But, I think the era of the online political forum, or online forums in general, is coming to an end.
 
archives said:
That’s a joke, their Messiah promised to do everything from ending the Ukrainian War on Day one, 99 deals in 90 days, releasing the Epstein files, amongst dozens of others, and these MAGA fools think Mamdani not keeping promises is a “gotcha”

Amazing MAGA can’t recognize their own hypocrisy
Click to expand...
Poor anchovies, the topic is mamdani and NYC.
 
archives said:
Says a guy who guarantee has never been to NYC and the only thing he knows about it is what he hears on Fox
Click to expand...
Well, I have been on I-390, but no, we didn't go into the city. I saw the buildings and didn't want to. :rofl2:
True story, the tall buildings were intimidating to me.
Oh, what I've heard about it is from people that lived there.
A lot of people, now that I think about it.
One was an engineer that designed skyscrapers.
Another guy used to blast the tunnels for the subways with a stick and dynamite. (He was from Poughkeepsie)
NY Rican girl, used to hang out with her.
 
countryboy said:
I think he's just stupid. Most of the libs on this forum are semi-literate retards who never grew up. It's pretty pathetic with this place has become. But, I think the era of the online political forum, or online forums in general, is coming to an end.
Click to expand...
No, he's about as stupid as Obama. Not.
It's intentional traitorism.
What, you think "Cash4Clunkers" was just stupid? No, it was intentional undermining of America. (by Obama)
Mamdami is intentionally undermining NYC, and Spanberger is intentionally undermining VA, exactly in the same manner Obama did in America.
I hope they get caught dead to rights.
 
Matt Dillon said:
No, he's about as stupid as Obama. Not.
It's intentional traitorism.
What, you think "Cash4Clunkers" was just stupid? No, it was intentional undermining of America. (by Obama)
Mamdami is intentionally undermining NYC, and Spanberger is intentionally undermining VA, exactly in the same manner Obama did in America.
I hope they get caught dead to rights.
Click to expand...

Matt, sit down and learn.

Why the “intentional undermining” claim doesn’t fit the evidence​

  • The program was passed by Congress with bipartisan support (including Republican co‑sponsors in the Senate).
  • Its goals were consistent with mainstream Keynesian stimulus policy, not political subversion.
  • Independent analyses criticize it for poor design, limited long‑term effect, or waste, but none describe it as an effort to harm the country.
In other words, economists debate whether it was effective, not whether it was malicious.


A broader way to understand it​

Cash‑for‑Clunkers sits in a long tradition of U.S. economic‑stimulus programs—some successful, some not. Its mixed results reflect:

  • the difficulty of designing short‑term stimulus
  • the challenge of predicting consumer behavior
  • the tension between environmental and economic goals
These are policy‑design issues, not evidence of intent to weaken the nation.
 
Jake Starkey said:
Matt, sit down and learn.

Why the “intentional undermining” claim doesn’t fit the evidence​

  • The program was passed by Congress with bipartisan support (including Republican co‑sponsors in the Senate).
  • Its goals were consistent with mainstream Keynesian stimulus policy, not political subversion.
  • Independent analyses criticize it for poor design, limited long‑term effect, or waste, but none describe it as an effort to harm the country.
In other words, economists debate whether it was effective, not whether it was malicious.


A broader way to understand it​

Cash‑for‑Clunkers sits in a long tradition of U.S. economic‑stimulus programs—some successful, some not. Its mixed results reflect:

  • the difficulty of designing short‑term stimulus
  • the challenge of predicting consumer behavior
  • the tension between environmental and economic goals
These are policy‑design issues, not evidence of intent to weaken the nation.
Click to expand...
None of that applies here, dumbass. :|
What Obama did was take a majority of post-WW2 vehicles away from Americans and used their own tax money to do it, now the average price of a vehicle is more than a house used to cost, and it killed tons of jobs, too. It was intentionally traitorous.
Obama is not stupid. Malicious and a faggot, yes.
You might could go buy a '79 Pontiac Ventura like Mal's niece stole from him for $600, but the government already bought them all up and scrapped them with $4K a pop of taxpayer money.
 
Last edited:
Matt Dillon said:
No, he's about as stupid as Obama. Not.
It's intentional traitorism.
What, you think "Cash4Clunkers" was just stupid? No, it was intentional undermining of America. (by Obama)
Mamdami is intentionally undermining NYC, and Spanberger is intentionally undermining VA, exactly in the same manner Obama did in America.
I hope they get caught dead to rights.
Click to expand...
I was talking about Anchovies. Not Mamdani. Though, he's never had any real world experience, and is little more than a commie nepo baby.
 
It all applies, you clown. What you are claiming is not so, has been debunked and you look stupid. Stop your drunken blabbing.

Jake Starkey said:
Matt, sit down and learn.

Why the “intentional undermining” claim doesn’t fit the evidence​

  • The program was passed by Congress with bipartisan support (including Republican co‑sponsors in the Senate).
  • Its goals were consistent with mainstream Keynesian stimulus policy, not political subversion.
  • Independent analyses criticize it for poor design, limited long‑term effect, or waste, but none describe it as an effort to harm the country.
In other words, economists debate whether it was effective, not whether it was malicious.


A broader way to understand it​

Cash‑for‑Clunkers sits in a long tradition of U.S. economic‑stimulus programs—some successful, some not. Its mixed results reflect:

  • the difficulty of designing short‑term stimulus
  • the challenge of predicting consumer behavior
  • the tension between environmental and economic goals
These are policy‑design issues, not evidence of intent to weaken the nation.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Matt Damon
None of that applies here, dumbass. :|
What Obama did was take a majority of post-WW2 vehicles away from Americans and used their own tax money to do it, now the average price of a vehicle is more than a house used to cost, and it killed tons of jobs, too. It was intentionally traitorous.
Obama is not stupid. Malicious and a faggot, yes.
You might could go buy a '79 Pontiac Ventura like Mal's niece stole from him for $600, but the government already bought them all up and scrapped them with $4K a pop of taxpayer money.
 
Jake Starkey said:
It all applies, you clown. What you are claiming is not so, has been debunked and you look stupid. Stop your drunken blabbing.


Matt Damon
None of that applies here, dumbass. :|
What Obama did was take a majority of post-WW2 vehicles away from Americans and used their own tax money to do it, now the average price of a vehicle is more than a house used to cost, and it killed tons of jobs, too. It was intentionally traitorous.
Obama is not stupid. Malicious and a faggot, yes.
You might could go buy a '79 Pontiac Ventura like Mal's niece stole from him for $600, but the government already bought them all up and scrapped them with $4K a pop of taxpayer money.
Click to expand...
Stuff your AI bullshit right up your ass sideways, mufugger.
Such crap. Fuck Off with that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top