NYT is finally woke? Dossier unfounded?

S

Stretch

New member
Is the NYT finally woke? Guess this was just a giant game of 'telephone'.
And, Mullet began his witch hunt AFTER knowing this dossier thing was garbage.
What a waste of time and money!!! :mad:

NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …
 
I love it; and I want some scrutiny on who the corrupt criminals were on Mueller's team that were illegally leaking investigatory information to the NYT.

Mueller Report Likely to Renew Scrutiny of Steele Dossier
 
Stretch said:
NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …
Click to expand...
I said so right away. Russian collusion was the stupidest meme ever devised
I'll have to read the article -NYTimes sees the light?
 
How the dossier ended up loaded with dubious or exaggerated details remains uncertain, but the document may be the result of a high-stakes game of telephone, in which rumors and hearsay were passed from source to source.
Click to expand...
makes sense "circular sourcing" is what the FISA warrants used to justify multi-sourcing
 
From the article:

Now the dossier — financed by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, and compiled by the former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele — is likely to face new, possibly harsh scrutiny from multiple inquiries.

Republicans in Congress have vowed to investigate. The Justice Department’s inspector general is considering whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation improperly relied on the dossier in applying to the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for a warrant to eavesdrop on Carter Page, a Trump adviser. The inspector general wants to know what the F.B.I. learned about Mr. Steele’s sources and whether it disclosed any doubts about their veracity to the court.

And Attorney General William Barr has said he will review the F.B.I.’s conduct in the Russia investigation. His remark that there was “spying” on the Trump campaign has already encouraged Republican accusations of misconduct.

Interviews with people familiar with Mr. Steele’s work on the dossier and the F.B.I.’s scramble to vet its claims suggest that misgivings about its reliability arose not long after the document became public — and a preoccupation of Trump opponents — in early 2017. Mr. Steele has made clear to associates that he always considered the dossier to be raw intelligence — not established facts, but a starting point for further investigation.

*****

Another possibility — one that Mr. Steele has not ruled out — could be Russian disinformation. That would mean that in addition to carrying out an effective attack on the Clinton campaign, Russian spymasters hedged their bets and placed a few land mines under Mr. Trump’s presidency as well.

Oleg D. Kalugin, a former K.G.B. general who now lives outside Washington, saw that as plausible. “Russia has huge experience in spreading false information,” he said.
 
Stretch said:
Is the NYT finally woke? Guess this was just a giant game of 'telephone'.
And, Mullet began his witch hunt AFTER knowing this dossier thing was garbage.
What a waste of time and money!!! :mad:

NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …
Click to expand...

You poor little buttmonkey.

There was no witchhunt.
It's not been proven to be 'garbage', nor does your link state that.
The predicate for the investigation is actually in the Mueller Report.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1119663089329344515

Please be less stupid.
 
Republicans WILL get to the bottom of this
and I use the term bottom figuratively

Clinton and her merry band of thugs will pay
shame it took so long because I'm guessing those hideous pant suits don't fit anymore, we will have to live thru fashion show nightmare II

maybe Kamala big butt Harris can loan her a few
 
Getin the ring said:
Republicans WILL get to the bottom of this
and I use the term bottom figuratively
Click to expand...

And, it speaks volumes to have dossier-signer Rosenweasel standing there with Barr, in effect lending his affirmation. (nice visual there Rod)
Me thinks Rosenweasel has obviously been humming, if not fully singing.
He can either save his skin a little or save it a lot......I believe he's opted for "a lot". We'll see. :cool:
 
CharacterAssassin said:
You I'm a poor little buttmonkey.
Click to expand...

Yes, you are.

CharacterAssassin said:
There was no witchhunt.
Click to expand...

Correct; it was a HOAX.

CharacterAssassin said:
It's not been proven to be 'garbage', nor does your link state that.
Click to expand...

It is garbage; hyper partisan garbage. Kind of like what sits between your ears asshole. :laugh:

CharacterAssassin said:
The predicate for the investigation is actually in the Mueller Report.
Click to expand...

A HOAX.

CharacterAssassin said:
Please be less stupid.
Click to expand...

I wish you could; really I do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top