NYT is finally woke? Dossier unfounded?

Stretch said:
Is the NYT finally woke? Guess this was just a giant game of 'telephone'.
And, Mullet began his witch hunt AFTER knowing this dossier thing was garbage.
What a waste of time and money!!! :mad:

NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …
Click to expand...

No doubt you'll be subscribing to the NYT now, won't you?
 
Stretch said:
Is the NYT finally woke? Guess this was just a giant game of 'telephone'.
And, Mullet began his witch hunt AFTER knowing this dossier thing was garbage.
What a waste of time and money!!! :mad:

NYT: "Ha ha, funny story, you'll never believe it. That dossier we spent years defending as legitimate and a worthy basis for FISA wiretaps on citizens is so unfounded it might actually be Russian disinformation, just like the collusion skeptics warned." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/us/politics/steele-dossier-mueller-report.html …
Click to expand...

You really don't need proof that the closest most Trumpkins ever get to the NYT is something their demogogues told them or a rare article they found on line

Authors are conservative contributors to the NYT, unlike most right wing "news outlets" the NYT and WP offers views from both positions. The article is an opinion piece

But the biggest irony is that the Mueller Report basically had little to say about the dossier, Mueller knowing it was a lesser player in anything. If you actually read the FICA applications you wold see the same thing, it isn't even mentioned in the FISA applications till later.

Point being the only parties finding the dossier that relevant is the right wing media largely because it never was the center piece to anything other than their effort to enrich their conspiracies
 
archives said:
You really don't need proof that the closest most Trumpkins ever get to the NYT is something their demogogues told them or a rare article they found on line

Authors are conservative contributors to the NYT, unlike most right wing "news outlets" the NYT and WP offers views from both positions. The article is an opinion piece

But the biggest irony is that the Mueller Report basically had little to say about the dossier, Mueller knowing it was a lesser player in anything. If you actually read the FICA applications you wold see the same thing, it isn't even mentioned in the FISA applications till later.

Point being the only parties finding the dossier that relevant is the right wing media largely because it never was the center piece to anything other than their effort to enrich their conspiracies
Click to expand...

I highly doubt you even looked at who the authors were. As you are wrong. They are also all Pulitzer prize winning journalists. I do have to say though I am surprised the NYT would actually publish this truth. They must be getting nervous.
 
Sailor said:
I highly doubt you even looked at who the authors were. As you are wrong. They are also all Pulitzer prize winning journalists. I do have to say though I am surprised the NYT would actually publish this truth. They must be getting nervous.
Click to expand...

I never commented on the authors' credibility, and the point that seemingly went right over your head is that it was an opinion piece, not a news report

And what in the hell would the NYT be "getting nervous" about?
 
archives said:
I never commented on the authors' credibility, and the point that seemingly went right over your head is that it was an opinion piece, not a news report

And what in the hell would the NYT be "getting nervous" about?
Click to expand...

That spin is not working Archive. See if you can try again.
 
Stretch said:
From the article:

Now the dossier — financed by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, and compiled by the former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele — is likely to face new, possibly harsh scrutiny from multiple inquiries.
Click to expand...
When the snippet begins with a lie, there's no reason to finish reading. You dug up a Right Wing opinion piece in the NYT? What does that prove?
 
archives said:
You really don't need proof that the closest most Trumpkins ever get to the NYT is something their demogogues told them or a rare article they found on line

Authors are conservative contributors to the NYT, unlike most right wing "news outlets" the NYT and WP offers views from both positions. The article is an opinion piece

But the biggest irony is that the Mueller Report basically had little to say about the dossier, Mueller knowing it was a lesser player in anything. If you actually read the FICA applications you wold see the same thing, it isn't even mentioned in the FISA applications till later.

Point being the only parties finding the dossier that relevant is the right wing media largely because it never was the center piece to anything other than their effort to enrich their conspiracies
Click to expand...

You judged the article on the basis of who wrote it, not on it's merits or arguments. That's a fallacy.

Only the parties finding the dossier irrelevant is the left wing media, but that doesn't make it irrelevant. The FBI used a bogus dossier, paid for Trump's opposition, to justify spying on a candidate's campaign just weeks before Election Day. It's right in the application. They quote the document at length.
 
Getin the ring said:
Republicans WILL get to the bottom of this
and I use the term bottom figuratively

Clinton and her merry band of thugs will pay
shame it took so long because I'm guessing those hideous pant suits don't fit anymore, we will have to live thru fashion show nightmare II

maybe Kamala big butt Harris can loan her a few
Click to expand...

I’m more hopeful than optimistic we will see Belly Up To The Barr Fridays but it will be great fun if it happens lol.
 
Heff said:
You judged the article on the basis of who wrote it, not on it's merits or arguments. That's a fallacy.

Only the parties finding the dossier irrelevant is the left wing media, but that doesn't make it irrelevant. The FBI used a bogus dossier, paid for Trump's opposition, to justify spying on a candidate's campaign just weeks before Election Day. It's right in the application. They quote the document at length.
Click to expand...

It gets even messier if it’s established that the FBI was helping to pay for oppo research against a presidential campaign.

Some serious shit can go down over this.
 
bodhisattva said:
I said so right away. Russian collusion was the stupidest meme ever devised
I'll have to read the article -NYTimes sees the light?
Click to expand...

Certainly the most ironic meme ever devised.

Think about it: using Russian misinformation and propaganda to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with the Russians.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Certainly the most ironic meme ever devised.

Think about it: using Russian misinformation and propaganda to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with the Russians.
Click to expand...
lol..Mueller is a mess.
Russian collusion was SERIOUS delusions..and now onto "Obstruction" with no obstructive acts!! :rolleyes:
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
It gets even messier if it’s established that the FBI was helping to pay for oppo research against a presidential campaign.

Some serious shit can go down over this.
Click to expand...

I'll donate a few more shovels for the left. Look at all that's been unearthed already on the left while the target was Trump!. Can you imagine how much better it's going to get
if they want dig even more? Keep diggin' Dems. Here's another shovel. LOL!!! :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top