USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
And I should have thought that Santa was real when I was three, but it wasn't evidence of his existence, nor is somebody's assumption evidence of another's belief.
Are you suggesting that Santa isn't real??
And I should have thought that Santa was real when I was three, but it wasn't evidence of his existence, nor is somebody's assumption evidence of another's belief.
Nelly was born in 1799, which means that she was between 20 when George died- hardly a 3 year old. *shrug*And I should have thought that Santa was real when I was three, but it wasn't evidence of his existence, nor is somebody's assumption evidence of another's belief.
The age wasn't the point. The assumption is. George went into a room and did something she couldn't see, doesn't know about, and he doesn't tell her what it is, and it is "evidence" of his Christianity...Nelly was born in 1799, which means that she was between 20 when George died- hardly a 3 year old. *shrug*
Obviously George did more than that. He was President, after all, for eight years when she was between 10 and 18.The age wasn't the point. The assumption is. George went into a room and did something she couldn't see, doesn't know about, and he doesn't tell her what it is, and it is "evidence" of his Christianity...
Stupid.
Again, George told people that knew him that he went to church to satisfy a wish of his wife's not of his own. And again, it is unimportant to me if George was a Christian or not. I know he believed in God, because he was a freemason, but using, "He went alone into a room, talked nothing of it, and wouldn't let anybody else in." as evidence of his Christianity is silly.Obviously George did more than that. He was President, after all, for eight years when she was between 10 and 18.
There is also, of course, his affiliations with Christian churches of the day...
But don't let the massive amount of evidence contrary to your faith and belief stop you from wishing with all your might that you are correct. *shrug*
Obviously you've created a caricature of her observations.Again, George told people that knew him that he went to church to satisfy a wish of his wife's not of his own. And again, it is unimportant to me if George was a Christian or not. I know he believed in God, because he was a freemason, but using, "He went alone into a room, talked nothing of it, and wouldn't let anybody else in." as evidence of his Christianity is silly.
Not particularly, it describes it accurately. Obviously you have taken the assumption of another as stronger evidence than it is, and the reasoning behind the assumption as something more than it is.Obviously you've created a caricature of her observations.
Again you've created a caricature by focusing in on a portion of one sentence instead of looking at all eight paragraphs provided in the link as a whole with their obvious logical train of thought and conclusion. But I suppose one must justify their beliefs somehow. *shrug*Not particularly, it describes it accurately. Obviously you have taken the assumption of another as stronger evidence than it is, and the reasoning behind the assumption as something more than it is.
Her evidence for his Christianity is how he went somewhere alone daily to do something that he wouldn't talk about and would not let her participate in. It isn't evidence of anything other than her assumption based on what she wanted George to be and her "shock" at people wondering.
And I believe that you are projecting your action onto me.Again you've created a caricature by focusing in on a portion of one sentence instead of looking at all eight paragraphs provided in the link as a whole with their obvious logical train of thought and conclusion. But I suppose one must justify their beliefs somehow. *shrug*
And I believe that you are projecting your action onto me.
I read the letter and at the end, in the paragraph before the signature, of that letter she makes no certain determination and says that he "must have been Christian" because his wife didn't fear for his soul when he died.
I read what she wrote and understand her presumptions, and even she did not make that certain statement as you do.
He may have been Christian, or he may not have been. It really isn't that important, but to say you have a certainty when even his granddaughter makes it clear that there was no certain answer only subjective evidence, well is assumptive and directly does what you attempt to accuse me of here.
Dude, even a person who was that close could not say with a certainty and only gives vague evidence based on what she couldn't know and hadn't seen, yet you attempt to make me believe you have certainty. It's silly.So your standard now raises to past beyond reasonable doubt.
Nothing is certain only beyond reasonable doubt.Dude, even a person who was that close could not say with a certainty....
Which, again, the person close to him had. Clearly. You are getting desperate now. You post this as "proof" that he is a Christian, and even this close relative had doubts.Nothing is certain only beyond reasonable doubt.
You must be getting desperate to argue that these are words of doubt:Which, again, the person close to him had. Clearly. You are getting desperate now. You post this as "proof" that he is a Christian, and even this close relative had doubts.
Is it necessary that any one should certify, "General Washington avowed himself to me a believer in Christianity?" As well may we question his patriotism, his heroic, disinterested devotion to his country. His mottos were, "Deeds, not Words"; and, "For God and my Country."
Sure there is, he took communion weekly at his Espicopalian Church!
You must be getting desperate to argue that these are words of doubt:
LOL. Again. For those who think it is "proof" that he was a Christian....You must be getting desperate to argue that these are words of doubt: